Many educators are reluctant to use scripted instruction, reporting that scripts are mechanical in nature and only appropriate for low-level skills. This study sought to investigate the impact of a supplemental program’s script on the rate of on-task and off-task instructional opportunities offered by the instructor for students to practice the specific skills targeted in lesson exercises. Using a multiple-baseline across-participants design, four paraeducators delivered daily instruction, first in a nonscripted version of an explicit supplemental program and then in the scripted version of the same program, to 12 first-grade students identified at risk for reading failure. Upon introduction of the script, the rate of on-task instructional opportunities for student practice was substantially higher, and the rate of off-task instructional opportunities diminished. Both paraeducators and student participants preferred the scripted instruction.
Adams, G.L., & Englemann, S. ( 1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR . Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
2.
Beck, I.L., Farr, R.C., Strickland, D.S., Ada, A.F., Brechtel, M., & McKeown, M. et al. (2007). Harcourt trophies: A Harcourt reading/language arts program. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt.
3.
Bessellieu, F.B., Kozloff, M.A., & Rice, J.S. ( 2001). Teachers’ perceptions of Direct Instruction teaching . Direct Instruction News, 4, 14-18.
4.
Brophy, J. ( 1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069-1077.
5.
Carnine, D. ( 1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199-206.
6.
Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. (Eds.). (2004). Direct Instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/ Merrill/Prentice Hall.
7.
Causton-Theoharis, J., Giangreco, M.F., Doyle, M.B., & Vadasy, P.F. ( 2007). Paraprofessionals: The "sous chefs" of literacy instruction . Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 56-62.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1987). Academy for effective instruction: Working with mildly handicapped students . Res-ton, VA: Author.
10.
Coyne, M.D., Kame‘enui, E. J., & Carnine, D.W. (2007). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
11.
DeVries, R. ( 2006). Sociomoral atmosphere in Direct Instruction, eclectic, and constructivist kindergartens: A study of teachers’ enacted interpersonal understanding. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4, 449-471.
12.
Ellis, E.S., Worthington, L.A., & Larkin, M.J. ( 2002). Executive summary of the research synthesis on effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators. Available at http://idea.uorego.edu/-ncite/documents/techrep/tech06.html
Englert, C.S. ( 1984). Effective Direct Instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38-47.
16.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Ferguson, C. ( 1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children , 58, 436-450.
17.
Furtak, E.M., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Shemwell, J.T., Ayala, C.C., Brandon, P.R., & Shavelson, R.J. , et al. (2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 360-389.
18.
Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., & Garet, L. ( 2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 915-945.
19.
Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., Broer, S.M., & Doyle, M.B. ( 2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68, 45-63.
20.
Gibbs, S., Campbell, M., Helf, S., & Cooke, N. ( 2007). Early reading tutor. Columbus, OH : SRA/McGraw-Hill.
21.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
22.
Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R.V. ( 1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic achievement . In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
23.
Helf, S., Cooke, N.L., & Flowers, C.P. ( 2009). Effects of two grouping conditions on measures of reading achievement and efficiency for students at-risk for reading failure. Preventing School Failure, 53(2), 113-126.
24.
Hempenstall, K. ( 2004). The importance of effective instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to Direct Instruction (pp. 28-65). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
25.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
26.
Johnson, K.R., & Layng, T.J. ( 1994). The morningside model of generative instruction. In R. Gardner, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, & J. Eshelman, et al. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173-197). Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
27.
Kohl, H. ( 2009, January 8). The educational panopticon. Teachers College Record. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from http://www.tcrecord.org
28.
Kohler, D.W., Crilley, K., & Shearer, D.D. ( 2001). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes . Journal of Educational Research, 90, 240-250.
29.
Kohler, D.W., Ezell, H.K., & Paluselli, M. ( 1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. Journal of Special Education, 33, 154-165.
30.
Kovaleski, J.F., Gickling, E.E., Morrow, H., & Swank, P.R. ( 1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170-183.
31.
Kretlow, A.G., Wood, C.L., & Cooke, N.L. ( 2009). Using in-service and coaching to increase kindergarten teachers’ accurate delivery of group instructional units. Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466909341333.
32.
Lane, K.L., Fletcher, T., Carter, E.W., Dejud, C., & DeLorenzo, J. ( 2007). Paraprofessional-led phonological awareness training with youngsters at risk for reading and behavioral concerns. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 266-276.
33.
Maheady, L., Harper, G.F., Mallette, B., & Karnes, M. ( 2004). Preparing preservice teachers to implement class wide peer tutoring. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 52-62.
34.
Morgan, R.L., Menlove, R., Salzberg, C.L., & Hudson, P. ( 1994). Effects of peer coaching on the acquisition of Direct Instruction skills by low-performing teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 59-76.
35.
Przychodzin-Havis, A.M., Marchand-Martella, N.E., Martella, R.C., Miller, D.A., Warner, L., & Leonard, B., et al. (2005). An analysis of Corrective Reading research . Journal of Direct Instruction, 5, 37-65.
36.
Sawyer, K. ( 2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 12-20.
37.
Schieffer, C., Marchand-Martella, N., Martella, R., & Simonsen, F. (n.d.). The research base for Reading Mastery. Retrieved December 18, 2008, from https://www.sraonline.com/download/DI/Research/Reading/RM_Results_Brochure_low.pdf
38.
Simmons, D.C., Kame’enui, E.J., Harn, B., Coyne, M.D., Stoolmiller, M., & Santoro, L.E., et al. (2007). Attributes of effective and efficient kindergarten reading intervention: An examination of instructional time and design specificity . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 331-347.
39.
Stebbins, L.B., St Pierre, . R.G., Proper, E.C., Anderson, R.B., & Cerva, T. ( 1997). Education as experimentation: A planned variation model , Vol. IV-A. An evaluation of Follow Through. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates .
40.
Sterling, R., Barbetta, P.M., Heward, W.L., & Heron, T.E. ( 1997). A comparison of active student response and on-task instruction on the acquisition and maintenance of health facts by fourth grade special education students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 151-165.
41.
Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. ( 2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 109-119.
42.
U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Reading first: Guide to U. S. Department of Education programs. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/index.html
43.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf
44.
Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. ( 2006). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 365-378.
45.
Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Tudor, S. ( 2007). Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 508-525.
46.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. ( 2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66, 163-171.
47.
Watkins, C.L., & Slocum, T.A. ( 2004). The components of Direct Instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to Direct Instruction (pp. 28-65). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
48.
Wilkinson, L.A. ( 2006). Monitoring treatment integrity: An alternative to the "consult and hope" strategy in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology International, 27, 426-437.
49.
Yoon, K.S., Duncan, T., Lee, S.W.-Y., Scarloss, B., Shapley, K. ( 2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007 -No. 033).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
