The purpose of this study was to explore research and publishing preparation, experiences, and expectations of music education faculty members employed at higher education institutions. We developed the Publishing Preparation and Expectations Survey (PPES) to examine music education faculty members’ current areas of research, peer-reviewed journals they read and published in, and their experiences with peer reviewers. Utilizing the Directory of Music Faculties from the College Music Society, we distributed the PPES to 1,081 music education faculty members across 487 higher education institutions in the United States, resulting in 179 responses. The participants self-reported as predominantly White (n = 157, 87.7%), female (n = 101, 56.4%), and possessing a PhD (n = 145, 81.0%). Additionally, 83 participants (46.4%) initially submitted a research article for publication in a peer-reviewed music education journal during their doctoral programs. Participants anticipated publishing an average of 11.44 articles (SD = 8.89) for promotion to associate professor and had an average of 9.81 (SD = 11.02) peer-reviewed research articles previously published. Finally, participants shared their experiences with peer reviewers using descriptors such as “discouraging,” “harsh,” and “cruel.”
BrewerW. D.RickelsD. A. (2012). Demographics and faculty time allocation of music education professors in the United States. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 22(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083711424504
4.
BrewerW. D.RickelsD. A. (2014). A content analysis of social media interactions in the Facebook Band Directors Group. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 201, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717692380
5.
BrittinR. V.StandleyJ. M. (1997). Researchers in music education/therapy: Analysis of publications, citations, and retrievability of work. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345471
6.
CamaM. G.JorgeM. L.PenaF. J. (2016). Gender differences between faculty members in higher education: A literature review of selected higher education journals. Educational Research Review, 18, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.001
7.
CataldiE. F.BradburnE. M.FahimiM. (2005). 2004 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF:04): Background characteristics, work activities, and compensation of instructional faculty and staff: Fall 2003 (NCES 2006-176). U.S. Department of Education.
8.
ChaD.Amrein-BeardsleyA. (2024). A survey research study of music education faculty: Demographics as related to indicators of job satisfaction and stress. International Journal of Music Education, 42(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614231164652
9.
ChandlerK. W.RussellJ. A. (2012). A comparison of contracted and ideal music education faculty workload. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 193, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.193.0077
10.
ColbeckC. L. (1997, March24–28). The main reciprocal for teaching load: Faculty use of research time [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, United States.
11.
ColbeckC. L. (2002, April1–5). Balancing teaching with other responsibilities: Integrating roles or feeding alligators [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, United States.
ConwayC. M. (2008). Experienced music teacher perceptions of professional development throughout their careers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 176, 7–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319429
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
15.
De RondM.MillerA. N. (2005). Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850
16.
GilbertR. (2004). A framework for evaluating the doctoral curriculum. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188258
17.
GrashelJ. (1998). Women as researchers: Publications in the “Journal of Research in Music Education,” 1953–94. The Bulletin of Historical Research on Music Education, 20(10), 17–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40214977
18.
HeddenS. K. (1993). Music education research: A dozen conventions and a dozenJRME columns. The Bulletin of Historical Research in Music Education, 15(1), 17–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40214823
HerbertD. G. (2008). Forms of graduate music education: A response to Kenneth Phillips. Research & Issues in Music Education, 6(1), Article 3. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/rime/vol6/iss1/3
21.
HewittM. P.ThompsonL. K. (2006). A survey of music teacher educators’ professional backgrounds, responsibilities and demographics. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 170, 47–61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319348
22.
HumphreysJ. T. (1999). The Bulletin of Historical Research in Music Education: Its authors, reviewers, and editorial committee members for the first twenty years. The Bulletin of Historical Research in Music Education, 20(3), 171–180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40214998
JorgensenE. R.YobI. M. (2023). Editorial reflections on philosophizing in music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 31(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.2979/pme.2023.a909305
25.
KonerK. (2024). A content analysis of graduate degrees in music education in NASM accredited institutions. Visions of Research in Music Education, 46, 1–25.
26.
KonerK.ErosJ. (2019). Professional development for the experienced music educator: A review of recent literature. Update: Applications of Research for Music Education, 37(3), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318812426
27.
LambovskaM.TodorovaD. (2021). ‘Publish and flourish’ instead of ‘publish or perish’: A motivation model for top-quality publications. Journal of Language and Education, 7(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11522
28.
LeBlancA.McCraryJ. (1990). Motivation and perceived rewards for research by music faculty. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344830
29.
MadsenC. K. (2003). Instruction and supervision of graduate students in music education. Research Studies in Music Education, 21(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X030210010601
30.
MantieR. (2022). Struggling with good intentions: Music education research in a “post” world. Research Studies in Music Education, 44(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X211056466
31.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
32.
MillerA. N.TaylorS. G.BedeianA. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751
33.
NilesM. T.SchimanskiL. A.McKiernanE. C.AlperinJ. P. (2020). Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations. PLoS One, 15(3), Article e0228914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914
34.
NyuntG.O’MearaK.BachL.LaFaveA. (2024). Tenure undone: Faculty experiences of organizational justice when tenure seems or becomes unattainable. Equity & Excellence in Education, 57(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2021.2010013
PalkkiJ.AlbertD. J.HillS. C.ShawR. D. (2016). 20 years of the MENC biennial conference: A content analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415621896
37.
PellegrinoK.ConwayC. M.MillicanJ. S. (2018). Tenure and promotion experiences of music teacher educators: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717730085
PorterS. R.UmbachP. (2000, May21–24). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling [Paper presentation]. Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
40.
ReynoldsG. A.HamannD. L. (2010). Music education faculty research publication productivity covering the years 1989–2003. Contributions to Music Education, 37(1), 9–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24127265
41.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
42.
SchmidtC. P.ZdzinskiS. F. (1993). Cited quantitative research articles in music education research journals, 1975–1990: A content analysis of selected studies. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345475
43.
SharobeamM. H.HowardK. (2002). Teaching demands versus research productivity: Faculty workload in predominantly undergraduate institutions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(7), 436–441.
44.
SimsW. L.CassidyJ. W. (2016). The role of the dissertation in music education doctoral programs. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(3), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837155782
45.
SimsW. L.CassidyJ. W. (2019). Impostor phenomenon responses of early career music education faculty. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418812464
46.
SimsW. L.LordoJ.PhelpsC. W. (2016). Analysis of publication decisions for Journal of Research in Music Education manuscripts (2009–2014). Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415627991
47.
StanleyA. M.SnellA.EdgarS. (2014). Collaboration as effective music professional development: Success stories from the field. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713502731
48.
TeachoutD. J. (2004). Incentives and barriers for potential music teacher education doctoral students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(3), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345857
49.
TeachoutD. J. (2008). Incentives and barriers for completing music teacher education doctoral programs. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 178, 7–20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319335
50.
TrowerC. A. (2012). Success on the tenure track: Five keys to faculty job satisfaction. Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
VasilM.McCallJ. M. (2018). The perspectives of two first-generation college students pursuing doctoral degrees in music education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717717464
52.
YarbroughC. (1984). A content analysis of the Journal of Research in Music Education, 1953-1983. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(4), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344920
53.
YarbroughC. (1996). “The future of scholarly inquiry in music education”: 1996 senior researcher award acceptance address. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345593
54.
YuanR. (2017). ‘This game is not easy to play’: A narrative inquiry into a novice EFL teacher educator’s research and publishing experiences. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1182936
55.
YuanR. (2021). “Living in parallel worlds”: Investigating teacher educators’ academic publishing experiences in two Chinese universities. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(6), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1681260
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
