The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a beginning jazz improvisation learning environment for middle school instrumentalists, including whether one of two instructional sequences of harmonic form improvisation tasks better supported four outcomes: achievement, self-assessment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Over 12 weeks, fifth- to eighth-grade instrumentalists (n = 43) studied jazz improvisation in a learning environment with four critical features: (a) forming cooperative jazz combos, (b) making jazz thinking visible, (c) encouraging specific feedback, and (d) implementing harmonic form sequencing. Quantitative data for all outcomes were collected pre-, mid-, and postinstruction. Primary findings showed: (a) a significant effect on all outcomes over time, not only for the 12-week duration of the instructional period but even in the first 6 weeks; (b) a significant interaction between assessed task (i.e., a modal- or blues-based improvisation) and achievement; (c) evidence of transfer of learning when, midinstruction, participants significantly improved at both tasks after only studying one; and (d) no significant effect according to instructional sequence of harmonic form (i.e., modal/blues vs. blues/modal).
AebersoldJ. (1992). A new approach to jazz improvisation (6th rev. ed.). Jamey Aebersold Jazz, Inc.
2.
AlexanderM. L. (2012). Fearless improvisation: A pilot study to analyze string students’ confidence, anxiety, and attitude toward learning improvisation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123312457884
3.
AndermanE. M. (2020). Achievement motivation theory: Balancing precision and utility. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101864
4.
AzzaraC. D. (1993). Audiation-based improvisation techniques and elementary instrumental students’ music achievement. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345508
5.
AzzaraC. D. (1999). An aural approach to improvisation. Music Educators Journal, 86(3), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399555
6.
AzzaraC. D. (2002). Improvisation. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. P. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the music educators national conference (pp. 171–187). Oxford University Press.
7.
BakerD. (1988). David Baker’s jazz improvisation: A comprehensive method of study for all players (2nd ed.). Alfred.
8.
BakerD. (1989). David Baker’s jazz pedagogy: A comprehensive method of jazz education for teacher and student (2nd ed.). Alfred.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
11.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
12.
BashL. (1983). The effectiveness of three instructional methods on the acquisition of jazz improvisation skills. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(7), 2079.
13.
BellandB. R.KimC. M.HannafinM. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
14.
BlumenfeldP. C.KemplerT. M.KrajcikJ. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). Cambridge University Press.
15.
BowmanW. D. (1988). Doctoral research in jazz improvisation pedagogy: An overview. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 96, 47–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318210
16.
BritnerS. L.PajaresF. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
17.
BurnsedC. V. (1978). The development and evaluation of an introductory jazz improvisation sequence for intermediate band students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(8), 4578A.
18.
CiorbaC.R. (2006). The creation of a model to predict jazz improvisation achievement (Publication No. 3243107) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
19.
CiorbaC. R. (2009). Predicting jazz improvisation achievement through the creation of a path-analytical model. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 180, 43–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319319
20.
CiorbaC. R.RussellB. E. (2014). A proposed model of jazz theory knowledge acquisition. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(3), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414542979
21.
CokerJ. (1964). Improvising jazz. Prentice-Hall.
22.
CokerJ. (1978). Listening to jazz. Prentice-Hall.
23.
CollinsA. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47–60). Cambridge University Press.
24.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.NewmanS. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Erlbaum.
25.
CoyD. A. (1989). A multisensory approach to teaching jazz improvisation to middle school band students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(11), 3508.
26.
DavisonP.D. (2006). The role of self-efficacy and modeling in improvisation: The effects of aural and aural/notated modeling conditions on intermediate instrumental music students’ improvisation achievement (Publication No. 3254179) [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
27.
DunlapL.ZismanM. (Eds.). (2003). The real easy book. Sher Music Co.
28.
EdelsonD. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<355::AID-TEA1010>3.0.CO;2-M
29.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Education Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
30.
GordonE. (1992). Advanced measures of music audiation. GIA Publications, Inc.
31.
HruskaB. J. (2011). Using mastery goals in music to increase student motivation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 30(1), 3–9. http://doi.org/10.1177/8755123311418477
32.
KanterD. E. (2010). Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project-based science curricula for meaningful understanding. Science Education, 94(3), 525–551. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20381
33.
KratusJ. (1995). A developmental approach to teaching music improvisation. International Journal of Music Education, 26(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/025576149502600103
34.
LepperM. R.CorpusJ. H.IyengarS. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
35.
LevineM. (1995). The jazz theory book. Sher Music.
36.
Linnenbrink-GarciaL.MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R. (2011). Motivation and achievement. In ColwellR.WebsterP. R. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning, Volume 1: Strategies (pp. 216–264). Oxford University Press.
37.
MaduraP. (1996). Relationships among vocal jazz improvisation achievement, jazz theory knowledge, imitative ability, musical experience, creativity, and gender. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(3), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345598
38.
MayL. F. (2003). Factors and abilities influencing achievement in instrumental jazz improvisation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345377
39.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. P. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the music educators national conference (pp. 327–347). Oxford University Press.
40.
MikszaP.WatsonK.CalhounI. (2018). The effect of mental practice on melodic jazz improvisation achievement. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 28(1), 40–49. http://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000206
41.
PajaresF.JohnsonM. J.UsherE. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171749
42.
PajaresF.SchunkD. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In RidingR.RaynerS. (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). Abex Publishing.
RyanA. M.PatrickH. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437
45.
SadlerP. M.CoyleH. P.SchwartzM. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_3
46.
SchattM. D. (2011). Achievement motivation and the adolescent musician: A synthesis of the literature. Research & Issues in Music Education, 9(1), Article 5. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/rime/vol9/iss1/5
47.
SmithB. P. (2011). Motivation to learn music: A discussion of some key elements. In ColwellR.WebsterP. R. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning: Volume 1: Strategies (pp. 265–300). Oxford University Press.
48.
ThibeaultM. D. (2022). Aebersold’s mediated play-a-long pedagogy and the invention of the beginning jazz improvisation student. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294211031894
49.
TuckerO. (2020). Mastery goals and intrinsic motivation in instrumental ensembles. Music Educators Journal, 106(4), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432120901767
50.
UrdanT.KaplanA. (2020). The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101862
51.
UsherE. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 275–314. http://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208324517
52.
UsherE. L.PajaresF. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 125–141. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002
53.
WatsonK. E. (2010). The effects of aural versus notated instructional materials on achievement and self-efficacy in jazz improvisation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(3), 240–259. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410377115
54.
WatsonK. E. (2014). The jazz combo: A model of collaborative learning. The Canadian Music Educator, 56(1), 44–46.
55.
WatsonK. E. (2015). Relationships among selected practice behaviours and achievement in jazz improvisation. Music Education Research, 17(1), 57–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2014.986080
56.
WatsonK. E. (2017). A comparative analysis of method books for class jazz instruction. Update: Application of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 5–11. http://doi.org/10.1177/8755123317692640
57.
WestC. (2015). What research reveals about school jazz education. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 34–40. http://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314547825
58.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. http://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
