This multiple case study examined undergraduate music majors’ perceptions of their experiences while enrolled in a basic conducting course. During the semester, three sophomore music majors with an emphasis in band, choir, or orchestra each participated in three interviews, completed weekly reflection logs, and attended an end-of-the-semester videotaped conducting review. Analysis of the data revealed that participants focused on issues related to conducting gesture, often expressed uncertainty about their leadership and conducting abilities, believed that score study increased their confidence and conducting effectiveness, and that only after conducting an ensemble did they begin to gain awareness of the complexities of conducting. Furthermore, participants expressed the desire for more individualized feedback and conducting opportunities. These results suggest that undergraduates enrolled in conductor preparation programs might benefit from pedagogical activities that (a) connect their nonverbal conducting behavior to score study practices and (b) help students gain greater confidence when leading an ensemble.
ArmstrongS.ArmstrongS. (1996). The conductor as transformational leader. Music Educators Journal, 82(6), 22–25.
2.
BattistiF. L. (1997). Conducting isn’t easy. The Instrumentalist, 3, 43–50.
3.
BattistiF. L.GarofaloR. (1990). Guide to score study for the wind band conductor. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Meredith Music.
4.
BoardmanS. M. (2000). A survey of the undergraduate instrumental conducting course in region seven of the national association of schools of music (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
5.
ByoJ. L.AustinK. R. (1994). Comparison of expert and novice conductors: An approach to the analysis of nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Band Research, 30(1), 11–34.
6.
ByoJ. L.PriceH. E. (2002). Rehearsing and conducting. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 335–351). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
CalderheadJ. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 211–217.
8.
CorporonE. (1997). The quantum conductor. In MilesR. (Ed.), Teaching music through performance in band (pp. 11–26). Chicago, IL: GIA.
9.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–131.
10.
CruickshankD.JenkinsD.MetcalfK. (2003). The act of teaching. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
11.
DeVenneyD. (2010). The promising conductor: A practical guide for beginning choral conductors. Dayton, OH: Roger Dean Publishing.
12.
DurrantC. (1996). Towards a model of effective choral conducting: Implications for music education, musical communication and curriculum development (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Surrey, UK.
13.
DurrantC. (2005). Shaping identity through choral activity: Singers’ and conductors’ perceptions. Research Studies in Music Education, 24(1), 88–98.
14.
DurrantC.VarvarigouM. (2008). Real time and virtual: Tracking the professional development of choral conductors. Reflecting Education, 4(1), 72–80.
15.
EllisB. L. (1994). Selected band conductors’ preparation to conduct selected band compositions. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55–09A, 2626. (UMI No. 9503132)
16.
FredricksonW. E.JohnsonC. M.RobinsonC. R. (1998). The effect of pre-conducting and conducting behaviors on the evaluation of conductor competence. Journal of Band Research, 33(2), 1–13.
17.
GarnettL. (2009). Choral conducting and the construction of meaning. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
18.
HarrisF.Jr. (2001). Conducting with feeling. Galesville, MD: Meredith Music.
19.
JuchniewiczJ. (2010). The influence of social intelligence on effective music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(3), 276–293.
20.
KaiserK. (1999). Pre-internship fears of student teaching. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 17(2), 27–32.
21.
LabutaJ. A. (2004). Basic conducting techniques (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
22.
LaneJ. S. (2002). A descriptive analysis of undergraduate instrumental music education majors’ score study behaviors. Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
23.
LaneJ. (2006). Undergraduate instrumental music education majors’ approach to score study in various musical contexts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(3), 215–230.
24.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
ManfredoJ. (2008). Factors influencing curricular content for undergraduate instrumental conducting courses. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 175, 45–62.
27.
MathersA. (2008). How theories of expressive movement and non-verbal communication can enhance expressive conducting at all levels of entering behavior (Unpublished PhD thesis). Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
28.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
MorrisonS. J.PriceH. E.GeigerC. G.CornacchioR. A. (2009). The effect of conductor expressivity on ensemble performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57(1), 37–49.
30.
O’DonoghueT. O.PunchK. (2003). Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
31.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
PriceH. E.WinterS. (1991). Effect of strict and expressive conducting on performances and opinions of eighth-grade band students. Journal of Band Research, 27(1), 30–43.
33.
RominesF. D. (2003). A survey of undergraduate instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Band Research, 38(2), 80–90.
34.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
RunnelsB. D. (1992). Practices in the teaching of instrumental conducting at the undergraduate level among colleges and universities in the upper Midwest (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, MI.
36.
SilveyB. A. (2011). Undergraduate music majors’ perceptions of instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 27–38.
37.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
SteeleN. (2010). Special topics: Three characteristics of effective teachers. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28(2), 71–78.
39.
TeachoutD. J. (1997). Preservice and experienced teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 41–50.
40.
VanWeeldenK. (2002). Relationships between perceptions of conducting effectiveness and ensemble performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 165–176.
41.
WaymireM. D. (2011). Behavioral analysis of directors of high-performing versus low-performing high school bands. Dissertation Abstracts International, 73(02), 0522. (UMI No. 3479034)
42.
WhitakerJ. A. (2011). High school band students’ and directors’ perceptions of verbal and nonverbal teaching behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(3), 290–309.
43.
YarbroughC. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(2), 134–146.
44.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
