According to self-determination theory (SDT), the learning experiences of music students can be explained partly by the autonomy-supportive style adopted by their music teachers. To provide the first in-depth understanding of how music performance teachers support the autonomy of their students and how this support is related to students’ well-being, we adopted SDT and the PERMA model of well-being. We provide answers to three fundamental questions about teacher-student relationships in music: (1) Do music performance teachers support the autonomy of their students in higher music education? (2) How do students perceive this support? and (3) How does autonomy support affect music students’ well-being? Music performance teachers (n = 35) and students (n = 190) were recruited from higher music education institutions in the United Kingdom. Analyses included mean comparisons of teachers’ and students’ answers to survey questions, correlational analyses of teacher-student dyads’ responses on measures, and qualitative analyses of open-ended questions. Results showed that teachers and students mostly agreed that teachers provide autonomy support to their students. Teachers’ transmission of passion for music and autonomy-supportive behaviors were related to students’ well-being, whereas controlling behaviors hindered well-being. Qualitative results showed that although students put well-being at the core of their concerns, music teachers seemed unaware or ill-prepared to face those concerns.
AscensoS.WilliamonA.PerkinsR. (2017). Understanding the wellbeing of professional musicians through the lens of positive psychology. Psychology of Music, 45, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616646864
2.
BarlowD. H. (2000). Unraveling the mysteries of anxiety and its disorders from the perspective of emotion theory. American Psychologist, 55, 1247–1263.
3.
BelmontM.SkinnerE. A.WellbornJ.ConnellJ. P. (1992). Teacher as social context (TASC): Two measures of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support. Technical Report, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
4.
BlackA. E.DeciE. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.
5.
Bonneville-RoussyA.EvansP.Verner-FilionJ.VallerandR. J.BouffardT. (2017). Motivation and coping with the stress of assessment: Gender differences in outcomes for university students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.08.003
6.
Bonneville-RoussyA.LavigneG. L. G. L.VallerandR. J. (2011). When passion leads to excellence: The case of musicians. Psychology of Music, 39, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735609352441
Bonneville-RoussyA.VallerandR. J.BouffardT. (2013). The roles of autonomy support and harmonious and obsessive passions in educational persistence. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.015
9.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R.ChurchillL. E.SherwoodA.WeislerR. H.FoaE. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): New self-rating scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379–386.
10.
CreechA.HallamS. (2010). Learning a musical instrument: The influence of interpersonal interaction on outcomes for school-aged pupils. Psychology of Music, 38, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610370222
11.
DavidsonJ. W.MooreD. G.SlobodaJ. A.HoweM. J. A. (1998). Characteristics of music teachers and the progress of young instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 141–160.
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
13.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
14.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L. (2006). The nature of expertise: Narrative descriptions of 19 common elements observed in the lessons of three renowned artist-teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 170, 7–19.
EvansP.Bonneville-RoussyA. (2016). Self-determined motivation for practice in university music students. Psychology of Music, 44, 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615610926
17.
EvansP.McPhersonG. E.DavidsonJ. W. (2013). The role of psychological needs in ceasing music and music learning activities. Psychology of Music, 41, 600–619.
18.
FreerE.EvansP. (2018). Psychological needs satisfaction and value in students’ intentions to study music in high school. Psychology of Music, 46, 881–895https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617731613
19.
GauntH. (2008). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36, 215–245.
20.
GauntH. (2010). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal students. Psychology of Music, 38, 178–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735609339467
21.
GauntH. (2011). Understanding the one-to-one relationship in instrumental/vocal tuition in higher education: Comparing student and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Music Education, 28, 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051711000052
22.
JørgensenH. (2000). Student learning in higher instrumental education: Who is responsible?British Journal of Music Education, 17, 67–77.
23.
KennyD.DriscollT.AckermannB. (2014). Psychological well-being in professional orchestral musicians in Australia: A descriptive population study. Psychology of Music, 42, 210–232.
24.
KoopmanC.SmitN.de VugtA.DeneerP.den OudenJ. (2007). Focus on practice-relationships between lessons on the primary instrument and individual practice in conservatoire education. Music Education Research, 9, 373–397.
25.
LaneK. L.GivnerC. C.PiersonM. R. (2004). Teacher expectations of student behavior: Social skills necessary for succes in elementary school classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 104–110.
26.
MageauG. A.VallerandR. J.CharestJ.SalvyS.-J.LacailleN.BouffardT.KoestnerR. (2009). On the development of harmonious and obsessive passion: The role of autonomy support, activity specialization, and identification with the activity. Journal of Personality, 77, 601–646.
27.
McLachlanS.HaggerM. S. (2010). Effects of an autonomy-supportive intervention on tutor behaviors in a higher education context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1204–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.01.006
28.
McPhersonG. E.GabrielssonA. (2002). From sound to sign. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 99–116). Oxford University Press.
29.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3, 169–186.
30.
PapageorgiI.CreechA.HaddonE.MortonF.De BezenacC.HimonidesE.PotterJ.DuffyC.WhytonT.WelchG. (2010). Perceptions and predictions of expertise in advanced musical learners. Psychology of Music, 38, 31–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735609336044
31.
PatstonT. (2014). Teaching stage fright? Implications for music educators. British Journal of Music Education, 31, 85–98.
32.
PelletierL. G.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.BrièreN. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406
33.
ReeveJ. (1998). Autonomy support as an interpersonal motivating style: Is it teachable?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 312–330.
34.
ReeveJ. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484
35.
ReeveJ. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175.
36.
ReeveJ. (2015). Giving and summoning autonomy support in hierarchical relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12189
37.
ReeveJ.BoltE.CaiY. (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537
38.
ReeveJ.JangH. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
39.
RenwickJ. M.McPhersonG. E. (2002). Interest and choice: Student-selected repertoire and its effect on practising behaviour. British Journal of Music Education, 19, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051702000256
40.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
41.
SeligmanM. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being. New York: Simon and Schuster.
42.
SimonesL. L. (2017). Beyond expectations in music performance modules in higher education: Rethinking instrumental and vocal music pedagogy for the twenty-first century. Music Education Research, 19, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2015.1122750
43.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A.MooreD. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02591.x
44.
SpielbergerC. D. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI (form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
45.
SyrjalaM.SaarelaH.LehtonenK. (2005). The relationship between master music teachers and master students: Counseling concerns. Gifted Education International, 19, 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940501900311
46.
VaismoradiM.TurunenH.BondasT. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.
47.
VallerandR. J. (2008). On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 1–13.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
