We assessed the effects of singing in two venues on acoustic and perceptualmeasures of performances by an SATB choir (N = 28) as it sang in three spacing conditions, on two different riser unit heights, with data acquired from four microphone locations in each hall. Among primary acoustic results, long-term average spectra measures yielded a systematic pattern of significant contrasts between close and spread spacing conditions, with decreasing high-frequency energy as space between singers increased, regardless of venue, riser unit, or microphone location. Unlike previous findings with 12-in. (0.30-m) riser step heights, a doubled 16-in. (0.41-m) height did not enhance this pattern. Primary perceptual results were as follows: (a) All choristers (100%) thought spread singer spacing facilitated best hearing of their own voices in relation to the rest of the ensemble. (b) Nearly all singers (96%) reported their most comfortable vocal production in spread spacing. (c) All choristers thought the doubled riser step heights influenced choral sound, but 78% described vocal production as most comfortable with spread spacing on the regular riser unit. We discuss results in terms of implications for choral pedagogy and directions for future research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
0.00 MB
0.38 MB