Acoustic and perceptual measures of SATB choir performances on two types of portable choral riser units in three singer-spacing conditions

Abstract

Under controlled conditions, we assessed acoustically (long-term average spectra) and perceptually (singer survey, listener survey) six performances of an soprano, alto, tenor, and bass (SATB) choir (N = 27) as it sang the same musical excerpt on two portable riser units (standard riser step height, taller riser step height) with varied dimensions of largely horizontal space (close spacing, lateral spacing, circumambient spacing) between singers. Given previous research that suggested horizontally spread spacing between choristers contributes to chorister perceptions of more efficient vocal production and audience preferences for choral sound, we wondered: (1) if spectra analyses might point to a possible acoustical explanation for auditor preferences; and (2) if increasing the height of riser steps to add more vertical space between rows of singers would affect choir sound.

Statistical analyses of spectra data acquired from an audience position microphone found significant differences (p < .001) in mean signal amplitudes among the various performances. The taller riser unit appeared to enhance modestly the contributions of horizontally spread lateral and circumambient singer spacing. These effects were most robust (c.2–4dB) in diffusion of higher frequency partials in the 2.4–3.7kHz range in and around the ‘singer’s formant’ frequency region on both riser units, and in 4.7–7.1kHz partials on the tall riser unit.

All choristers (100%) thought horizontal singer spacing influenced choir sound; 92.59% of singers described this perceived influence as ‘moderate’ or ‘much.’ Most choristers (96.29%) thought riser step height influenced choral sound, with 62.95% of singers perceiving this influence as ‘moderate’ or ‘much.’ Singers thought spread spacing contributed to most comfortable vocal production, better hearing of self and ensemble, and best overall choir sound.

Listener (N = 21) survey results indicated significant preference for the overall sound of the spread singer conditions in close versus spread comparisons.

Keywords

choir risers choral sound long-term average spectra (LTAS)singer spacing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aspaas

McCrea

C. R.

Morris

R. J.

Fowler

(2004). Select acoustic and perceptual measures of choral formation. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 2(1), 11–26.

Daugherty

J. F.

(1996, April). Differences in choral sound as perceived by auditors and choristers relative to physical positioning and spacing of singers in a high school choir: A pilot study. Poster presented at the national convention of The National Association for Music Education- MENC, Kansas City, MO.

Daugherty

J. F.

(1999). Spacing, formation, and choral sound: Preferences and perceptions of auditors and choristers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(3), 224–238.

Daugherty

J. F.

(2003). Choir spacing and formation: Choral sound preferences in random, synergistic, and gender specific placements. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 1(1), 48–59.

Daugherty

J. F.

(2005, October). The effects of choir spacing and choir formation on the tuning accuracy and intonation tendencies of a mixed choir. Paper presented at the Acoustical Society of America National Conference, Minneapolis, MN.

The Ellsworth County Independent Reporter. (1934, June 13). Mixed choir interesting. Retrieved from: http://www.ellsworthinderep.com/web/isite.dll?1244585300023

Fletcher

Munson

W. A.

(1933). Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5, 82–108.

Ford

J. K.

(2003). Preference for strong or weak singer’s formant resonance in choral tone quality. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 1(1), 29–47.

Howard

D. M.

Angus

(2006). Acoustics and psychoacoustics (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Focal Press.

10.

Kegerreis

(1970). History of the high school a cappella choir. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18(4), 319–329.

11.

Music Educators National Conference (MENC). (1934). Paysen’s collapsible chorus stands (advertisement). Music Educators Journal, 21(3), 63. Virginia: MENC.

12.

Music Educators National Conference (MENC). (1936). Paysen’s collapsible chorus stands: Start the year right! Paysen’s collapsible choir-stands (advertisement). Music Educators Journal, 23(1), 68. Virginia: MENC.

13.

Music Educators National Conference (MENC). (1942). Paysen’s collapsible chorus stands: Paysen’s risers make good choirs better (advertisement). Music Educators Journal, 28(4), 71. Virginia: MENC.

14.

Music Educators National Conference (MENC). (1943). Paysen’s collapsible chorus stands: Paysen’s choir risers (advertisement). Music Educators Journal, 29(6), 52. Virginia: MENC.

15.

Morris

Mustafa

McCrea

C. R.

Fowler

Aspaas

(2007). Acoustic analysis of the interaction of choral arrangements, musical selection, and microphone location. Journal of Voice, 21(5), 568–575.

16.

Morris

Ternström

LoVetri

Berkun

(2010). Long-term average spectra from a youth choir singing in three vocal registers and two dynamic levels. Journal of Voice. doi:10.10162010.07.003

17.

Paysen

(1931). US Patent No. 1,818,428. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office. Retrieved from: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1818428.html

18.

SICO Europe Ltd. (2010). Three and four step harmony choral risers. Advertising brochure. Retrieved from: http://www.sico-europe.com/choral_riser.php

19.

Ternström

(1989). Acoustical aspects of choir singing. (PhD dissertation). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

20.

Ternström

(1994). Hearing myself with others: Sound levels in choral performance measured with separations of one’s own voice from the rest of the choir. Journal of Voice, 8, 293–302.

21.

Ternström

(1999). Preferred self-to-other ratios in choir singing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3563–3574.

22.

Tonkinson

(1994). The Lombard effect in choral singing. Journal of Voice, 8(1), 24–29.

23.

Wenger Corporation. (2010). 2010 – 2011 Wenger equipment catalog. Owatonna, MN: Wenger.