In the difficult process of ending civil wars, granting amnesty during conflict is seen as a useful option, with an underpinning assumption that trading justice for peace is effective. However, is the case? This article tries to bring some clarity to when and how amnesty given during conflict has an impact. Amnesty should have different effects on diverse conflict endings: negotiated settlement, rebel victory, government victory, or conflict reduction. The article also disaggregates amnesties to test direct impacts as an incentive or through reducing the commitment problem, and indirect effects that give military advantage to the government. Using a cross-national data set of amnesties in dyadic conflicts from 1975 to 2011, the research finds that amnesty’s strongest effect is, surprisingly, not as an incentive but rather to reduce commitment problems. It can lead to negotiated settlements but also to government military advantage. The results have implications for negotiations and conflict resolution.
Anonymous. 1996. “Human Rights in Peace Negotiations.” Human Rights Quarterly18 (2): 249–58.
2.
BalcellsLaiaKalyvasStathis N.. 2014. “Does Warfare Matter? Severity, Duration, and Outcomes of Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (8): 1390–418.
3.
BercovitchJacobDeRouenKarl. 2005. “Managing Ethnic Civil Wars: Assessing the Determinants of Successful Mediation.” Civil Wars7 (1): 98–116.
4.
BiddleStephenFriedmanJeffrey A.ShapiroJacob N.. 2012. “Testing the Surge: Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007?” International Security37 (1): 7–40.
5.
BinningsbøHelga MalminLoyleCyanne E.GatesScottElsterJon. 2012. “Armed Conflict and Post-conflict Justice, 1946-2006: A Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research49 (5): 731–40.
6.
CarterDavid B.SignorinoCurtis S.. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis18 (3): 271–92.
7.
ClaytonGovinda. 2013. “Relative Rebel Strength and the Onset and Outcome of Civil War Mediation.” Journal of Peace Research50 (5): 609–22.
8.
ClaytonGovindaGleditschKristian Skrede. 2014. “Will We See Helping Hands? Predicting Civil War Mediation and Likely Success.” Conflict Management and Peace Science31 (3): 265–84.
9.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563–95.
10.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnkeSöderbomMåns. 2004. “On the Duration of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 253–73.
11.
CoppedgeMichealGerringJohnLindbergStaffan I.. 2017. “V-Dem Dataset v7.1.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Accessed October 5, 2019. http://www.v-dem.net.
12.
CunninghamDavid E.GleditschKristian SkredeSalehyanIdean. 2009. “It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 570–97.
13.
CunninghamKathleen Gallagher. 2011. “Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede: How Do States Respond to Internally Divided Separatists.” American Political Science Review105 (2): 275–97.
14.
DancyGeoff. 2018. “Deals with the Devil? Conflict Amnesties, Civil War, and Sustainable Peace.” International Organization72 (2): 387–421.
15.
DancyGeoffLessaFrancescaMarchesiBridgetPayneLeigh A.PereiraGabrielSikkinkKathryn. 2014. “The Transitional Justice Research Collaborative: Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide With New Data.”Accessed June 1, 2017. www.transitionaljusticedata.com.
16.
DeMerittJacqueline H. R.2016. “Transitional Justice: Prospects for Postwar Peace and Human Rights.” In What Do We Know about Civil Wars? edited by David MasonT.MitchellSara McLaughlin, 179–97. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
DoyleMichael W.SambanisNicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
EckKristineHultmanLisa. 2007. “One-sided Violence against Civilians in War.” Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 233–46.
19.
Escribà-FolchAbelWrightJoseph. 2015. “Human Rights Prosecutions and Autocratic Survival.” International Organization69 (2): 343–73.
20.
FearonJames D.1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization49 (3): 379–414.
21.
FearonJames D.2004. “Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others?” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 275–301.
22.
FearonJames D.2013. Fighting Rather than Bargaining. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
23.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
24.
FindleyMichaelRudloffPeter. 2012. “Combatant Fragmentation and the Dynamics of Civil Wars.” British Journal of Political Science42 (4): 879–901.
25.
FortnaVirginia Page. 2004. Peace Time: Cease-fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
FortnaVirginia Page. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
FreemanMark. 2009. Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GartnerScott SigmundBercovitchJacob. 2006. “Overcoming Obstacles to Peace: The Contribution of Mediation to Short-lived Conflict Settlements.” International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 819–40.
29.
HagelsteinRoman. 2008. “Explaining the Violence Pattern of the Algerian Civil War.” Households in Conflict Network Working Papers43:1–28.
30.
HarbomLottaMelanderErikWallensteenPeter. 2008. “Dyadic Dimensions of Armed Conflict, 1946—2007.” Journal of Peace Research45 (5): 697–710.
31.
HartzellCaroline A.HoddieMatthew. 2003. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 318–32.
32.
HultmanLisaKathmanJacobShannonMegan. 2014. “Beyond Keeping Peace: United Nations Effectiveness in the Midst of Fighting.” American Political Science Review108 (4): 737–53.
HuntingtonSamuel P.1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
35.
JohnstonPatrick B.2012. “Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns.” International Security36 (4): 47–79.
36.
KalyvasStathis N.2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
KalyvasStathis N.BalcellsLaia. 2010. “International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict.” American Political Science Review104 (3): 415–29.
38.
KirschnerShanna A.2010. “Knowing Your Enemy: Information and Commitment Problems in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution54 (5): 745–70.
39.
KreutzJoakim. 2010. “How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research47 (2): 243–50.
40.
LoyleCyanne E.BinningsbøHelga Malmin. 2018. “Justice during Armed Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (2): 442–66.
41.
LujalaPaivi. 2010. “The Spoils of Nature: Armed Civil Conflict and Rebel Access to Natural Resources.” Journal of Peace Research47 (1): 15–28.
MallinderLouise. 2008. Amnesty, Human Rights and Political Transitions: Bridging the Peace and Justice Divide. Oxford, UK: Hart.
44.
MallinderLouise. 2009. Global Comparison of Amnesty Laws. Siracusa, Italy: The International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Sciences. Accessed April 23, 2013. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1586831.
45.
MallinderLouiseHaddenTom. 2013. The Belfast Guidelines on Amnesty and Accountability. Belfast, UK: Transitional Justice Institute.
46.
MasonT. DavidFettPatrick J.. 1996. “How Civil Wars End: A Rational Choice Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (4): 546–68.
47.
MasonT. DavidWeingartenJoseph P.JrFettPatrick J.. 1999. “Win, Lose or Draw: Predicting the Outcome of Civil Wars.” Political Research Quarterly52 (2): 239–68.
48.
MelinMolly M.SvenssonIsak. 2009. “Incentives for Talking: Accepting Mediation in International and Civil Wars.” International Interactions35 (3): 249–71.
49.
MendezJuan. 2012. “Foreword.” In Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability, edited by LessaFrancescaPayneLeigh A., xvii–xxix. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
NilssonDesiree. 2008. “Partial Peace: Rebel Groups inside and outside of Civil War Settlements.” Journal of Peace Research45 (4): 479–95.
52.
NilssonDesiree. 2010. “Turning Weakness into Strength: Military Capabilities, Multiple Rebel Groups and Negotiated Settlements.” Conflict Management and Peace Science27 (3): 253–71.
53.
OlsenTricia D.PayneLeigh A.ReiterAndrew G.. 2010. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.
54.
OrentlicherDiane F.1991. “Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime.” Yale Law Journal100 (8): 2537–615.
55.
OrentlicherDiane F.1996. “Swapping Amnesty for Peace and the Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes.” ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law3:713.
56.
PattersonEric D.2012. Ending Wars Well. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
PeouSorpong. 2002. “Implementing Cambodia’s Peace Agreement.” In Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements, edited by StedmanStephen JohnRothchildDonaldCousensElizabeth M., 499–530. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
59.
PerryChrisSmithAdam C.. 2013. Trends in Uniformed Contributions to UN Peacekeeping: A New Dataset. New York: International Peace Institute. Accessed July 22, 2015. www.ipinst.org.
60.
PowellRobert. 2002. “Bargaining Theory and International Conflict.” Annual Review of Political Science5 (1): 1–30.
61.
PutnamTonya. 2002. “Human Rights and Sustainable Peace.” In Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements, edited by StedmanStephen JohnRothchildDonaldCousensElizabeth M., 237–72. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
62.
ReiterAndrew G.2014. “Examining the Use of Amnesties and Pardons as a Response to Internal Armed Conflict.” Israel Law Review47 (1): 144–47.
63.
ReiterAndrew G.OlsenTricia D.PayneLeigh A.. 2012. “Transitional Justice and Civil War: Exploring New Pathways, Challenging Old Guideposts.” Transitional Justice Review1 (1): 137–69.
64.
Roht-ArriazaNaomi. 1990. “State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law.” California Law Review78 (2): 449–514.
65.
Roht-ArriazaNaomi. 2006. “The New Landscape of Transitional Justice.” In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-first Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice, edited by Roht-ArriazaNaomiMariezcurrenaJavier, 1–16. New York: Cambridge University Press.
66.
RossM. L.2004. “What Do We Know about Natural Resources and Civil War?” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 337–56.
67.
RyckmanKirssa Cline. 2020. “Lasting Peace or Temporary Calm? Rebel Group Decapitation and Civil War Outcomes.” Conflict Management and Peace Science37 (2): 172–92.
68.
ScharfMichael P.1996. “Swapping Amnesty for Peace: Was There a Duty to Prosecute International Crimes in Haiti.” Texas International Law Journal31 (1): 1–41.
69.
SchomerusMareikeOgwaroBetty Acan. 2010. “Searching for Solutions in Juba: An Overview (2010).” In Accord 11: Initiatives to End the Violence in Northern Uganda, edited by DrewElizabeth, 10–13. London, UK: Conciliation Resources.
70.
Schulhofer-WohlJonah. 2007. “Algeria (1992-Present).” In Civil Wars of the World: Major Conflicts since World War II, edited by DeRouenKarl R.HeoUk, 103–24. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
71.
SikkinkKathryn. 2012. “The Age of Accountability: The Global Rise of Individual Criminal Accountability.” In Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability, edited by LessaFrancescaPayneLeigh A., 19–41. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SimmonsBeth A.DannerAllison. 2010. “Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court.” International Organization64 (2): 225–56.
73.
SkaarElin. 2012. “Reconciliation in a Transitional Justice Perspective.” Transitional Justice Review1 (1): 54–103.
74.
SnyderJackVinjamuriLeslie. 2003. “Trials and Errors: Principles and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security28 (3): 5–44.
75.
SriramChandra Lekha. 2004. Confronting Past Human Rights Violations: Justice vs. Peace in Times of Transition. New York: Frank Cass.
76.
SutterDaniel. 1995. “Settling Old Scores: Potholes along the Transition from Authoritarian Rule.” Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (1): 110–28.
TlemcaniRachid. 2008. Algeria under Bouteflika. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
79.
United Nations. n.d. “Peace Agreements Database.” Accessed May 1, 2015. peacemaker.un.org.
80.
United Nations Secretary-General. 1999. Seventh Report of the Secretary-general on the United Nations Observer Mission in Sierra Leone, Vol. S/1999/836. New York: United Nations.
81.
VinjamuriLeslieSnyderJack. 2004. “Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crimes Tribunals and Transitional Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science7:345–62.
82.
WalterBarbara F.1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization51 (3): 335–64.
83.
WalterBarbara F.2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
84.
WalterBarbara F.2006. “Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists But Not Others.” American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 313–30.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
