Are civilian attitudes a useful predictor of patterns of violence in civil wars? A prominent debate has emerged among scholars and practitioners about the importance of winning civilian ‘hearts and minds’ for influencing their wartime behavior. We argue that such efforts may have a dark side: insurgents can use pro-counterinsurgent attitudes as cues to select their targets and tactics. We conduct an original survey experiment in 204 Afghan villages and establish a positive association between pro-International Security Assistance Force attitudes and future Taliban attacks. We extend our analysis to 14,606 non-surveyed villages and demonstrate that our measure of civilian attitudes improves out-of-sample predictive performance by 20–30% over a standard forecasting model. The results are especially strong for Taliban attacks with improvised explosive devices. These improvements in predictive power remain even after adjusting for possible confounders, including past violence, military bases, and development aid.
BeathAndrewChristiaFotiniEnikolopovRuben (2011) Winning hearts and minds? Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan. MIT Political Science working paper no. 2011-14 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1809677).
2.
BeckNathanielKingGaryZengLangche (2000) Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: A conjecture. American Political Science Review94(1): 21–35.
3.
BermanEliShapiroJacobFelterJoseph (2011) Can hearts and minds be bought? The economics of counterinsurgency in Iraq. Journal of Political Economy119(4): 766–819.
BlairGraemeImaiKosukeLyallJason (2014) Comparing and combining list and endorsement experiments: Evidence from Afghanistan. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 1043–1063.
6.
BlattmanChristopherAnnanJeannie (2016) Can employment reduce lawlessness and rebellion? A field experiment with high-risk men in a fragile state. American Political Science Review110(1): 1–17.
7.
BohorquezJuanGourleySeanDixonAlexanderSpagatMichael (2009) Common ecology quantifies human insurgency. Nature462(17 December): 911–914.
8.
BraithwaiteAlexJohnsonShane (2012) Space-time modelling of insurgency and counterinsurgency in Iraq. Journal of Quantitative Criminology28(1): 31–48.
9.
BrandtBen (2011) The Taliban’s conduct of intelligence and counterintelligence. CTC-Sentinel4(6): 19–23.
10.
BullockWillImaiKosukeShapiroJacob (2011) Statistical analysis of endorsement experiments: Measuring support for militant groups in Pakistan. Political Analysis19(4): 363–384.
11.
ChiversChristopher J (2011) In eastern Afghanistan, at war with the Taliban’s shadowy rule. New York Times6 February, A1.
12.
ChristiaFotini (2012) Alliance Formation in Civil Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CrostBenjaminFelterJosephJohnstonPatrick (2014) Aid under fire: Development projects and civil conflict. American Economic Review104(6): 1833–1856.
14.
Department of the Army (2007) U.S. Army Field Manual No. 3-24. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Department of the Army (2014) Field Manual 3-24: Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
16.
DrakeCharles M (1998) The role of ideology in terrorists’ target selection. Terrorism and Political Violence10(2): 53–85.
17.
FearonJamesLaitinDavid (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
18.
FlynnMichaelPottingerMattBatchelorPaul (2010) Fixing Intel: A Blueprint for Making Intelligence Relevant in Afghanistan. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security.
19.
GiustozziAntonio (2013) Military adapation by the Taliban, 2001–2011. In: FarrellTheoOsingaFransRussellJames A (eds) Military Adaptation in Afghanistan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 242–262.
20.
GoldstoneJackBatesRobertEpsteinDavidGurrTed RobertLustikMichaelMarshallMontyUlfelderJayWoodwardMark (2010) A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science54(1): 190–208.
21.
GopalAnand (2014) No Good Men Among the Living: America, the Taliban, and the War Through Afghan Eyes. New York: Macmillan.
22.
Gutiérrez-SaninFranciscoWoodElisabeth (2014) Ideology in civil war: Instrumental adoption and beyond. Journal of Peace Research51(2): 213–226.
23.
HastieTrevorTibshiraniRobertFriedmanJerome (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. 2nd edition. New York: Springer.
24.
HillDanielJrJonesZachary (2014) An empirical evaluation of explanations for state repression. American Political Science Review108(3): 661–687.
25.
HoDanielImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis15(3): 199–236.
JohnsonThomas (2013) Taliban adaptations and innovations. Small Wars and Insurgencies24(1): 3–27.
28.
JohnsonThomasDuPeeMatthew (2012) Analyzing the new Taliban code of conduct (Layeha): An assessment of changing perspectives and strategies of the Afghan Taliban. Central Asian Survey31(1): 77–91.
29.
JohnsonNeilCarranSpencerBotnerJoelFontaineKyleLaxagueNathanNuetzelPhlipTurnleyJessicaTivnanBrian (2011) Pattern in escalations in insurgent and terrorist activity. Science333(6038): 81–84.
30.
KalyvasStathis (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KalyvasStathis (2008) Ethnic defection in civil wars. Comparative Political Studies41(8): 1043–1068.
32.
KalyvasStathis (2012) Micro-level studies of violence in civil war: Refining and extending the control–collaboration model. Terrorism and Political Violence24(4): 658–668.
33.
KingGaryZengLangche (2001) Improving forecasts of state failure. World Politics53(4): 623–658.
34.
LeitesNathanWolfCharles (1970) Rebellion and Authority: An Analytic Essay on Insurgent Conflicts. Chicago, IL: Markham.
35.
LyallJason (2010) Are co-ethnics more effective counterinsurgents? Evidence from the second Chechen war. American Political Science Review104(1): 1–20.
LyallJasonWilsonIsaiah (2009) Rage against the machines: Explaining outcomes in counterinsurgency war. International Organization63(1): 67–106.
38.
LyallJasonBlairGraemeImaiKosuke (2013) Explaining support for combatants in wartime: A survey experiment in Afghanistan. American Political Science Review107(4): 679–705.
39.
LyallJasonShiraitoYukiImaiKosuke (2015) Coethnic bias and wartime informing. Journal of Politics77(3): 833–848.
40.
MampillyZachariah (2011) Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
MetternichNilsDorffCassyGallopMaxWeschleSimonWardMichael (2013) Antigovernment networks in civil conflicts: How network structures affect conflictual behavior. American Journal of Political Science57(4): 892–911.
42.
MontgomeryJacobHollenbachFlorianWardMichael (2012) Improving predictions using ensemble Bayesian model averaging. Political Analysis20(3): 271–291.
Zammit-MangionAndrewDewarMichaelKadirkamanathanVisakanSanguinettiGuido (2012) Point process modeling of the Afghan War Diary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109(31): 12414–12419.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
