Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-8
Civil War Settlements,Perceived Agreement Fairness,and Trust in Political Authorities: Investigating the Influence of Power Sharing on Public Opinion in Divided Societies
Little is known about civil war settlements' effects on public opinion in countries emerging from conflict, cases in which beliefs in agreement fairness and trust in political authorities may influence acceptance of the peace process. We posit that settlements designed to redistribute power and resources will be perceived as fairer and produce larger improvements in trust in the national government for individuals from marginalized groups than for those from dominant groups. Employing original survey data collected in the Philippines, we test these propositions with reference to the country’s 2014 peace agreement. We find that marginalized Muslim groups perceive a fairer peace agreement and report improved trust in comparison to the dominant Christian community. Using a survey experiment to analyze the influence of power-redistributing settlement measures, we find that trust in the government is not significantly affected by information regarding power sharing, a result that holds for members of both communities.
AbanesMenandro S.ScheepersPeer L.H.SterkensCarl. 2014. “Ethno-Religious Groups, Identification, Trust and Social Distance in Ethno-Religiously Stratified Philippines.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility37 (September): 61-75.
2.
AlbinCecilia. 2019. “Negotiating Complex Conflicts.” Global Policy10 (2): 55-60.
3.
AmaralJoana. 2018. “Do Peace Negotiations Shape Settlement Referendums? The Annan Plan and the Good Friday Agreement Experiences Compared.” Cooperation and Conflict53 (3): 356-374.
BellChristineBadanjakSanja. 2019. “Introducing PA-X: A New Peace Agreement Database and Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research56 (3): 452-466.
7.
BoteroSandra. 2020. “Trust in Colombia’s Justicia Especial Para La Paz: Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Politics in Latin America12 (3): 300-322.
8.
BuhaugHalvardCedermanLars-ErikRødJan Ketil. 2008. “Disaggregating Ethno- Nationalist Civil Wars: A Dyadic Test of Exclusion Theory.” International Organization62 (3): 531-551.
CareySabine C.GonzálezBélenGlässelChristian. 2022. “Divergent Perceptions of Peace in Post-Conflict Societies: Insights from Sri Lanka.” Journal of Conflict Resolution66 (9): 1589-1618.
11.
CedermanLars-ErikGleditschKristian SkredeBuhaugHalvard. 2013. Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CórdovaAbbyLaytonMatthew L.. 2016. “When Is ‘Delivering the Goods’ Not Good Enough? How Economic Disparities in Latin American Neighborhoods Shape Citizen Trust in Local Government.” World Politics68 (1): 74-110.
13.
DruckmanDanielAlbinCecilia. 2011. “Distributive Justice and the Durability of Peace Agreements.” Review of International Studies37 (3): 1137-1168.
HartzellCaroline, 2023, "Replication Data for: Civil War Settlements, Perceived Agreement Fairness, and Trust in Political Authorities", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0ZXMYU, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:pSc1s+2kSiDy9rzc+MhXxA== [fileUNF]
17.
HartzellCaroline A.HoddieMatthew. 2003. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 318-332.
18.
HartzellCaroline A.HoddieMatthew. 2020. Power Sharing and Democracy in Post-Civil War States: The Art of the Possible. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HaasNicholasKhadkaPrabin B.. 2020. “If They Endorse It, I Can’t Trust It: How Outgroup Leader Endorsements Undercut Public Support for Civil War Peace Settlements.” American Journal of Political Science64 (4): 982-1000.
20.
HaassFelixOttmannMartin. 2017. “Profits from Peace: The Political Economy of Power- Sharing and Corruption.” World Development99: 60-74.
21.
HaassFelixHartzellCaroline A.OttmannMartin. 2022. “Citizens in Peace Processes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution66 (9): 1547-1561.
22.
HetheringtonMarc J.1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review92 (4): 791-808.
23.
HutchisonMarc L.JohnsonKristin. 2011. “Capacity to Trust? Institutional Capacity, Conflict, and Political Trust in Africa, 2000-2005.” Journal of Peace Research48 (6): 737-752.
JoshiMadhavQuinnJ. Michael. 2015. “Is the Sum Greater than the Parts? The Terms of Intrastate Peace Agreements and the Commitment Problem Revisited.”Negotiation Journal31 (1): 7-30.
27.
KingElisabethSamiiCyrus. 2020. Diversity, Violence, and Recognition: How Recognizing Ethnic Identity Promotes Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
KreutzJoakimNussioEnzo. 2019. “Destroying Trust in Government: Effects of a Broken Pact among Colombian Ex-Combatants.” International Studies Quarterly63 (4): 1175-1188.
29.
LoizidesNeophytosPsaltisCharisMorgan-JonesEdwardSudulichLauraPoppRalucaBaykizTekin. 2022. “Citizens and Peace Mediations in Divided Societies: Identifying Zones of Agreement through a Conjoint Survey Experiment.” Journal of Conflict Resolution66 (9): 1619-1649.
30.
LombardLouisaPiccoEnrica. 2021. “Distributive Justice and War: Displacement and Its Afterlives in the Central African Republic.” Journal of Refugee Studies34 (1): 806-829.
31.
LustickIan. 1979. “Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism versus Control.” World Politics31 (3): 325-344.
32.
Mac GintyRoger. 2017. “Everyday Social Practices and Boundary-Making in Deeply Divided Societies.” Civil Wars19 (1): 4-25.
33.
MatanockAila M.Garbiras-DíazNatalia. 2018. “Considering Concessions: A Survey Experiment on the Colombian Peace Process.” Conflict Management and Peace Science35 (6): 637-655.
34.
MillerA. H.ListhaugO.. 1990. “Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States.” British Journal of Political Science20 (3): 357-386.
35.
MontielCristina JaymeMacapagalMaria Elizabeth J.. 2006. “Effects of Social Position on Societal Attributions of an Asymmetric Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research43 (2): 219-227.
36.
Morgan-JonesEdwardSudulichLauraCochraneFeargalLoizidesNeophytos. 2020. “Citizen Preferences About Border Arrangements in Divided Societies: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in Northern Ireland.” Research & Politics7 (3): 1-8.
37.
ØstbyGudrun. 2008. “Polarization, Horizontal Inequalities and Violent Civil Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research45 (2): 143-162.
SchnaudtChristianHahnCarolineHeppnerElias. 2021. “Distributive and Procedural Justice and Political Trust in Europe.” Frontiers in Political Science3: 1-18.
42.
StokesDonald E.1962. “Popular Evaluation of Government: An Empirical Assessment.” In Ethics and Bigness: Scientific, Academic, Religious, Political, and Military, edited by ClevelandHarlandLasswellHarold D., 61-72. New York: Harper & Brothers.
43.
TellezJuan Fernando. 2019. “Peace agreement design and public support for peace: Evidence from Colombia.” Journal of Peace Research56 (6): 827-844.
44.
WalterBarbara F.2017. “The New New Civil Wars.” Annual Review of Political Science20 (1): 469-486.
45.
WelshNancy A.2004. “Fairness: Perceptions of Fairness in Negotiation.” Marquette Law Review87 (4): 753-767.
46.
WernerSuzanneYuenAmy. 2005. “Making and Keeping Peace.” International Organization59 (2): 262-293.
47.
ZmerliSonjaCastilloJuan Carlos. 2015. “Income Inequality, Distributive Fairness and Political Trust in Latin America.” Social Science Research52: 179-192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
