This article examines the effect of UN actions on the duration of international crises. Four different types of action – assurance, diplomatic engagement, military involvement, and intimidation – and three different outcomes – compromise, victory, and stalemate – are considered. After building on the existing literature to develop expectations of how a third party like the UN shapes crisis trajectories, hypotheses are tested using the International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data and a new events dataset on UN activity. Results from competing-risks models reveal that UN military involvement does well to decrease the risk of one side achieving victory, and diplomatic engagement increases the ability of the belligerents to reach a compromise in the long run. Moreover, diplomatic engagement accompanied by military involvement substantially hastens the pace of stalemate outcomes. Both tactics, however, have some trade-offs. Military involvement can decrease the sense of urgency for compromise; diplomatic engagement can be used for insincere motives and increase the risk of one-sided victory over time. UN actions of assurance and simple intimidation have considerable shortcomings as crisis management vehicles.
Balch-LindsayDylanEnterlineAndrew JJoyceKyle A (2008) Third-party intervention and the civil war process. Journal of Peace Research45(3): 345–363.
2.
BeardsleyKyle (2008) Agreement without peace? International mediation and time inconsistency problems. American Journal of Political Science52(4): 723–740.
3.
BeardsleyKyle (2009) Intervention without leverage: The political determinants of weak mediation. International Interactions35(3): 272–297.
4.
BeardsleyKyle (2010) Pain, pressure, and political cover: Explaining mediation incidence. Journal of Peace Research47(4): 395–406.
5.
BeardsleyKyle (2011) The Mediation Dilemma. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.
BeardsleyKyleSchmidtHolger (forthcoming) Following the flag or following the charter? Examining the determinants of UN involvement in international crises, 1945–2002. International Studies Quarterly. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00696.x.
7.
BeardsleyKyleQuinnDavidBiswasBidishaWilkenfeldJonathan (2006) Mediation style and crisis outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(1): 58–86.
8.
BettsRichard K (1994) The delusion of impartial intervention. Foreign Affairs73(6): 20–33.
9.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet MReiterDanZornChristopher (2003) Nonproportional hazards and event history analysis in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution47(1): 33–53.
10.
BrecherMichaelWilkenfeldJonathan (2000) A Study of Crisis. 2nd edn. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11.
CarterDavid BSignorinoCurtis S (2010) Back to the future: Modeling time dependency in binary data. Political Analysis18(3): 271–292.
12.
ChiozzaGiacomoGoemansHein E (2004) International conflict and the tenure of leaders: Is war still ex post inefficient?American Journal of Political Science48(3): 604–619.
13.
CollierPaulChauvetLisaHegreHåvard (2008) The security challenge in conflict-prone countries. Copenhagen Consensus 2008April.
14.
DebsAlexandreGoemansHein E (2010) Regime type, the fate of leaders, and war. American Political Science Review104(3): 430–445.
15.
DeRouenKarl (2003) The role of the UN in international crisis termination, 1945–1994. Defence and Peace Economics14(4): 251–260.
16.
DiehlPaul FReifschneiderJenniferHenselPaul R (1996) United Nations intervention and recurring conflict. International Organization50(4): 683–700.
17.
DoyleMichael WSambanisNicholas (2000) International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. American Political Science Review94(4): 779–801.
18.
DoyleMichael WSambanisNicholas (2006) Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
FavrettoKatja (2009) Should peacemakers take sides? Major power mediation, coercion, and bias. American Political Science Review103(2): 248–263.
20.
FilsonDarrenWernerSuzanne (2002) A bargaining model of war and peace: Anticipating the onset, duration, and outcome of war. American Journal of Political Science46(4): 819–837.
21.
FortnaVirginia Page (2003) Inside and out: Peacekeeping and the duration of peace after civil and interstate wars. International Studies Review5: 97–114.
22.
FortnaVirginia Page (2004a) Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war. International Studies Quarterly48(2): 269–292.
23.
FortnaVirginia Page (2004b) Interstate peacekeeping: Causal mechanisms and empirical effects. World Politics56: 481–519.
24.
GilliganMichael JSergentiErnest (2006) Evaluating UN peacekeeping with matching methods to improve causal inference. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Politics, New York University.
25.
GoemansHein E (2000) War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
GoemansHein E (2009) Risky but rational: War as an institutionally induced gamble. Journal of Politics71(1): 35–54.
27.
GreigJ Michael (2001) Moments of opportunity: Recognizing conditions of ripeness for international mediation between enduring rivals. Journal of Conflict Resolution45(6): 691–718.
28.
GreigJ MichaelDiehlPaul F (2005) The peacekeeping–peacemaking dilemma. International Studies Quarterly49(4): 621–645.
29.
HewittJoseph (2003) Dyadic processes and international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution47: 669–692.
30.
IacusStefano MKingGaryPorroGiuseppe (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis20(1): 1–24.
31.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 347–361.
32.
KupermanAlan J (2008) The moral hazard of humanitarian intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly52(1): 49–80.
33.
KyddAndrew (2003) Which side are you on? Bias, credibility, and mediation. American Journal of Political Science47(4): 597–611.
34.
KyddAndrew H (2005) Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
KyddAndrew H (2006) When can mediators build trust?American Political Science Review100(3): 449–462.
36.
KyddAndrew HWalterBarbara (2002) Sabotaging the peace: The politics of extremist violence. International Organization56: 263–296.
37.
LakeDavid ARothchildDonald (1996) Containing fear: The origins and management of ethnic conflict. International Security21: 41–75.
38.
LoNigelHashimotoBarryReiterDan (2008) Ensuring peace: Foreign-imposed regime change and postwar peace duration, 1914–2001. International Organization62: 717–736.
39.
LuttwakEdward N (1999) Give war a chance. Foreign Affairs78(4): 36–44.
40.
MattesMichaelaSavunBurcu (2009) Fostering peace after civil war: Commitment problems and agreement design. International Studies Quarterly53(3): 737–759.
41.
PowellRobert (2004) The inefficient use of power: Costly conflict with complete information. American Political Science Review98(2): 231–241.
42.
PowellRobert (2006) War as a commitment problem. International Organization60: 169–203.
43.
RauchhausRobert (2006) Asymmetric information, mediation and conflict management. World Politics58(2): 207–241.
44.
RauchhausRobert (2009) Principal–agent problems in humanitarian intervention: Moral hazard, adverse selection, and the commitment dilemma. International Studies Quarterly53(4): 871–884.
45.
ReganPatrick MStamAllan C (2000) In the nick of time: Conflict management, mediation timing, and the duration of interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly44: 239–260.
46.
ReiterDan (2009) How Wars End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
RichmondOliver (1998) Devious objectives and the disputants’ view of international mediation: A theoretical framework. Journal of Peace Research35(6): 707–722.
48.
SchultzKenneth A (2010) The enforcement problem in coercive bargaining: Interstate conflict over rebel support in civil wars. International Organization64(2): 281–312.
49.
SlantchevBranislav L (2003) The principle of convergence in wartime negotiations. American Political Science Review97(4): 621–632.
50.
SlantchevBranislav L (2004) How initiators end their wars: The duration of warfare and the terms of peace. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 813–829.
51.
SmithAlastairStamAllan (2003) Mediation and peacekeeping in a random walk model of civil and interstate war. International Studies Review5(4): 115–135.
52.
SnyderGlenn H (1984) The security dilemma in alliance politics. World Politics36(4): 461–495.
53.
StedmanStephen John (1997) Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security22(2): 5–53.
54.
SvenssonIsak (2007) Mediation with muscles or minds? Exploring power mediators and pure mediators in civil wars. International Negotiation12(2): 229–248.
55.
TararAhmer (2006) Diversionary incentives and the bargaining approach to war. International Studies Quarterly50(1): 169–188.
56.
TararAhmerLeventogluBahar (2009) Public commitment in crisis bargaining. International Studies Quarterly53(3): 817–839.
57.
ToftMonica D (2009) Securing the Peace: The Durable Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
TragerRobert FVavreckLynn (2011) The political costs of crisis bargaining: Rhetoric and the role of party. American Journal of Political Science55(3): 526–545.
59.
WalterBarbara F (2002) Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
WernerSuzanneYuenAmy (2005) Making and keeping peace. International Organization59(2): 261–292.
61.
WilkenfeldJonathanYoungKathleen JQuinnDavid MAsalVictor (2005) Mediating International Crises. New York: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
