While there has been extensive interest in the role of democracy in reducing interstate violence, the role of democracy in reaching higher levels of peace has received much less attention. Since many countries have less than amicable relations, it is necessary to consider how the quality of peace can be improved. The quality of peace becomes particularly relevant when assessing relations of countries with a bellicose past. In order to capture improvement in relations, this article relies upon a framework that captures the various levels of peace that countries experience. The study maintains that democracy contributes to former belligerents reaching the highest levels of peace but that it is not helpful at the lower levels especially if only one side is a democracy. The article tests arguments on a dataset that captures the transitions from one level of peace to another for all former belligerents since 1816 and relies upon event history analysis. The results for peace are not the opposite of what is found for war. The findings demonstrate that democracy plays a substantial role in peaceful transitions at all levels. However, while joint democracy is important for reaching the highest levels of peace, democracy can hamper the progress of relations at the lowest levels of peace.
AckermannAlice (1994) Reconciliation as a peace-building process in a post-war Europe: The Franco-German case. Peace and Change19
(3): 229–250.
2.
AdlerEmanuelBarnettMichael (1998) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AzarEdward (1986) Protracted international conflicts: Ten propositions. In: AzarEdwardBurtonJohn (eds) International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. London: Wheatsheaf, 28–39.
4.
Bar-Siman-TovYaacov (2004) Dialectics between stable peace and reconciliation. In: Bar-Siman-TovYaacov (ed.) From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press, 61–80.
5.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathanTuckerRichard (1998) Taking time seriously: Time-series–cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42
(4): 1260–1288.
6.
BennettScott (1996) Security, bargaining, and the end of interstate rivalry. International Studies Quarterly40(2): 157–183.
7.
BennettScottStamAllan (2000) EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26
(2): 179–204 (http://eugenesoftware.org).
8.
BlaineyGeoffrey (1988) The Causes of War, 3rd edn. New York: Free Press.
9.
BouldingKenneth (1978) Stable Peace. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
10.
Box-SteffensmseierJanetJonesBradford (2004) Timing and Political Change: Event History Modeling in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BremerStuart (1992) Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36
(2): 309–341.
12.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastairSiversonRandolphMorrowJames (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
ClevesMario (1999) Analysis of multiple failure-time data with Stata. Stata Technical Bulletin9: 38–49.
14.
ClodfelterMichael (2002) Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1500–2000. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
15.
ColaresiMichael (2004) When doves cry: Unreciprocated cooperation and leadership tenure. American Journal of Political Science48
(3): 555–570.
CrescenziMarkEnterlineAndrew (2001) Time remembered: A dynamic model of interstate interaction. International Studies Quarterly45
(3): 409–43.
18.
DahlRobert (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
DeutschKarlBurrellSidneyKannRobertLeeMauriceJrMartin LichtermanLindgrenRaymondLoewenheimFrancisWagenenRichard Van (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
DiehlPaulGoertzGary (2000) War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21.
DixonWilliam (1993) Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution37
(1): 42–68.
22.
Miriam FendiusElman, ed. (1997) Paths to Peace: Is Democracy the Answer?Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
23.
EricsonMagnus (2000) Birds of a feather? On the intersections of stable peace and democratic peace research programs. In: KacowiczArieBar-Siman-TovYaacovElgstromOleJerneckMagnus (eds) Stable Peace among Nations. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 130–139.
24.
FearonJames (1994) Domestic political audiences and escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88
(3): 577–592.
25.
FortnaPage (2004) Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
GaltungJohan (1985) Twenty-five years of peace research: Ten challenges and some responses. Journal of Peace Research22
(2): 141–158.
GhosnFatenPalmerGlennBremerStuart (2004) The MID 3 data set 1993–2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science21
(2): 133–154.
29.
GoertzGary (2006) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
GoertzGaryJonesBradfordDiehlPaul (2005) Maintenance processes in international rivalries. Journal of Conflict Resolution49
(5): 742–769.
31.
GoldsteinJoshuaFreemanJohn (1990) Three-Way Street. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
JervisRobert (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
JonesDanielBremerStuartSingerDavid (1996) Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science15
(2): 163–212.
34.
KacowiczArieBar-Siman-TovYaacov (2000) Stable peace: A conceptual framework. In: KacowiczArieBar-Siman-TovYaacovElgstromOleJerneckMagnus (eds) Stable Peace among Nations. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 11–35.
35.
KantImmanuel (1795/1996) Towards perpetual peace. In: GregorMary (ed.) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 317–351.
36.
KelmanHerbert (1999) Transforming the relationship between former enemies: A social-psychological analysis. In: RothsteinRobert (ed.) After the Peace: Resistance and Reconciliation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 193–205.
37.
KleinJamesGoertzP; GaryDiehlPaul (2008) The peace scale: Conceptualizing and operationalizing non-rivalry and peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science25
(1): 67–80.
38.
LebowRichard (1981) Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
LongWilliamBreckePeter (2003) War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
MaozZeev (1984) Peace by empire?Conflict outcomes and international stability, 1816–1976. Journal of Peace Research21
(3): 227–241.
MillerBenjamin (2001) Hot wars, cold peace. In: MaozZeevGatAzar (eds) War in a Changing World. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 93–142.
44.
MorrowJamesSiversonRandolphTabaresTressa (1998) The political determinants of international trade: The major powers, 1907–1990. American Political Science Review92
(3): 649–661.
45.
OrmeJohn (2004) The Paradox of Peace: Leaders, Decisions, and Conflict Resolution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
OwenJohn (1997) Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47.
OwenJohn (2000) Pieces of maximal peace: Common identities, common enemies. In: KacowiczArieBar-Siman-TovYaacovElgstromOleJerneckMagnus (eds) Stable Peace among Nations. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 74–91.
48.
ParryClive (1969–1983) The Consolidated Treaty Series. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.
49.
PollinsBrian (1989) Does trade still follow the flag?A model of international diplomacy and commerce. American Political Science Review83
(2): 465–480.
50.
Press-BarnathanGalia (2006) The neglected dimension of commercial liberalism: Economic cooperation and transition to peace. Journal of Peace Research43
(3): 261–278.
51.
PutnamRobert (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization42
(3): 427–460.
52.
RipsmanNorrin (2005) Two stages of transition from a region of war to a region of peace: Realist transition and liberal endurance. International Studies Quarterly49
(4): 669–694.
53.
RockStephen (1989) Why Peace Breaks Out. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
54.
RohnPeter (1983) World Treaty Index. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio Information Services.
55.
RussettBruce (1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Ewing, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
SarkeesMeredith (2000) The Correlates of War data on war: An update to 1997. Conflict Management and Peace Science18
(1): 123–144.
57.
SchmitterPhillipe (2004) The ambiguous virtues of accountability. Journal of Democracy15
(4): 47–60.
58.
SchultzKenneth (2001) Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SenesePaulQuackenbushStephen (2003) Sowing the seeds of conflict: The effect of dispute settlements on durations of peace. Journal of Politics65
(3): 696–717.
60.
SignorinoCurtisRitterJeffrey (1999) Tau-b or not Tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43
(1): 115–144.
61.
SingerDavidSmallMelvin (1973) The diplomatic importance of states, 1816–1970: An extension and refinement of the indicator. World Politics25
(4): 577–599.
62.
SingerDavidBremerStuartStuckeyJohn (1972) Capability distribution, uncertainty and major power war, 1820–1965. In: RussettBruce (ed.) Peace, War and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 19–48.
63.
SmallMelvinSingerDavid (1982) Resort to Arms: International and Civil War. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64.
SpectorBertram (1998) Deciding to negotiate with villains. Negotiation Journal14
(1): 43–59.
65.
StamAllan (1996) Win, Lose, or Draw: Domestic Politics and the Crucible of War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
66.
StedmanStephen (1997) Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security22
(2): 5–53.
67.
ThompsonWilliam (2001) Identifying rivals and rivalries in world politics. International Studies Quarterly45
(4): 557–586.
68.
VasquezJohn (1996) Understanding peace: Insights from International Relations theory and research. In: GregorThomas (ed.) A Natural History of Peace. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 273–295.
69.
WernerSuzanne (1999) The precarious nature of the peace: Resolving the issues, enforcing the settlement, and renegotiating the terms. American Journal of Political Science43
(3): 912–934.
70.
ZakariaFareed (1997) The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs76
(6): 22–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
