This article studies how receiving negative peer feedback, in the form of downvotes, affects user-generated content creation on Reddit. The authors focus on the following outcomes: (1) propensity to post (incidence), (2) where users post, and (3) the strength of opinion (intensity), measured by the extremity of users’ texts. The latter two outcomes are important given ongoing concerns about how social media platforms may contribute to echo chamber formation and polarization. The authors find that negative feedback, relative to no feedback, increases users’ subsequent posting activity, and they do not find evidence that receiving negative feedback drives users away, alleviating concerns about echo chamber formation. In addition, negative peer feedback moderates extreme sentiments—when initial views are extreme, users temper the intensity of their subsequent posts. These effects of negative feedback are consistent with users attempting to maintain their reputation.
AignerDennis J. (1973), “Regression with a Binary Independent Variable Subject to Errors of Observation,” Journal of Econometrics, 1 (1), 49–59.
2.
AndersonEric T.SimesterDuncan I. (2003), “Effects of $9 Price Endings on Retail Sales: Evidence from Field Experiments,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1 (1), 93–110.
3.
AskerDavidDinasElias (2019), “Thinking Fast and Furious: Emotional Intensity and Opinion Polarization in Online media,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 83 (3), 487–509.
4.
BergerJonahSorensenAlan T.RasmussenScott J. (2010), “Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales,” Marketing Science, 29 (5), 815–27.
5.
BizerGeorge Y.SchindlerRobert M. (2005), “Direct Evidence of Ending-Digit Drop-Off in Price Information Processing,” Psychology & Marketing, 22 (10), 771–83.
6.
BurtchGordonHeQinglaiHongYiliLeeDokyun (2022), “How Do Peer Awards Motivate Creative Content? Experimental Evidence from Reddit,” Management Science, 68 (5), 3488–3506.
7.
ChengJustinDanescu-Niculescu-MizilCristianLeskovecJure (2014), “How Community Feedback Shapes User Behavior,” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8, 41–50.
8.
CinelliMatteoDe Francisci MoralesGianmarcoGaleazziAlessandroQuattrociocchiWalterStarniniMichele (2021), “The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (9), e2023301118.
DandekarPranavGoelAshishLeeDavid T. (2013), “Biased Assimilation, Homophily, and the Dynamics of Polarization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (15), 5791–96.
11.
DeciEdward L.CascioWayne F. (1972), “Changes in Intrinsic Motivation as a Function of Negative Feedback and Threats,” paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Meeting, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED063558.
12.
DennyPaul (2013), “The Effect of Virtual Achievements on Student Engagement,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 763–72.
13.
DholakiaUtpal M.BagozziRichard P.PearoLisa Klein (2004), “A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network-and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (3), 241–63.
14.
DoHai HaPrasadPenatiyana W.C.MaagAngelikaAlsadoonAbeer (2019), “Deep Learning for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Review,” Expert Systems with Applications, 118, 272–99.
15.
EcklesDeanKizilcecRené F.BakshyEytan (2016), “Estimating Peer Effects in Networks with Peer Encouragement Designs,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (27), 7316–22.
16.
FongJessicaHunterMegan (2022), “Can Facing the Truth Improve Outcomes? Effects of Information in Consumer Finance,” Marketing Science, 41 (1), 33–50.
17.
FreedmanJonathan L.SearsDavid O. (1965), “Selective Exposure,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 57–97.
18.
FreyDieter (1986), “Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41–80.
19.
GallusJana (2017), “Fostering Public Good Contributions with Symbolic Awards: A Largescale Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia,” Management Science, 63 (12), 3999–4015.
20.
GoffmanErving (1949), “Presentation of Self in Everyday Life,” American Journal of Sociology, 55 (1), 6–7.
GuessAndrew M.MalhotraNeilPanJenniferBarberáPabloAllcottHuntBrownTaylorCrespo-TenorioAdrianaDimmeryDrewFreelonDeenGentzkowMatthewGonzález-BailónSandraKennedyEdwardKimYoung MieLazerDavidMoehlerDevraNyhanBrendanRiveraCarlos VelascoSettleJaimeThomasDaniel Robert, et al. (2023), “How do Social Media Feed Algorithms Affect Attitudes and Behavior in an Election Campaign?” Science, 381 (6656), 398–404.
23.
HuangJustin T.ChoiJangwonWanYuqin (2024), “Politically Biased Moderation Drives Echo Chamber Formation: An Analysis of User-Driven Content Removals on Reddit,” SSRN, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4990476.
24.
HuangJustin T.KaulRupaliNarayananSridhar (2022), “The Causal Effect of Attention and Recognition on the Nature of User-Generated Content: Experimental Results from an Image-Sharing Social Network,” SSRN, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4185208.
JinGinger ZheLesliePhillip (2009), “Reputational Incentives for Restaurant Hygiene,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1 (1), 237–67.
28.
JinJiahuaLiYijunZhongXiaojiaZhaiLi (2015), “Why Users Contribute Knowledge to Online Communities: An Empirical Study of an Online Social Q&A Community,” Information & Management, 52 (7), 840–49.
29.
KandelDenise B. (1978), “Similarity in Real-Life Adolescent Friendship Pairs,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (3), 306–12.
30.
LaceteraNicolaPopeDevin G.SydnorJustin R. (2012), “Heuristic Thinking and Limited Attention in the Car Market,” American Economic Review, 102 (5), 2206–36.
31.
LeeDokyunHosanagarKartikNairHarikesh S. (2018), “Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social media: Evidence from Facebook,” Management Science, 64 (11), 5105–31.
32.
LevyRo’ee (2021), “Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment,” American Economic Review, 111 (3), 831–70.
33.
ListJohn A.MuirIanPopeDevinSunGregory (2023), “Left-Digit Bias at Lyft,” Review of Economic Studies, 90 (6), 3186–3237.
34.
LuShijieXieYingChenXingyu (2022), “Immediate and Enduring Effects of Digital Badges on Online Content Consumption and Generation,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40 (1), 146–63.
35.
McInnesLelandHealyJohnAstelsSteve (2017), “hdbscan: Hierarchical Density Based Clustering,” Journal of Open Source Software, 2 (11), 205.
36.
McInnesLelandHealyJohnMelvilleJames (2018), “UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426.
37.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M. (2001), “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks,” Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–44.
38.
MoeWendy W.SchweidelDavid A. (2012), “Online Product Opinions: Incidence, Evaluation, and Evolution,” Marketing Science, 31 (3), 372–86.
39.
MoehringAlex (2023), “Personalized Rankings and User Engagement: An Empirical Evaluation of the Reddit News Feed,” OSF preprints, Center for Open Science, 8yuwe.
40.
MummalaneniSimhaYoganarasimhanHemaPathakVarad V. (2022), “Producer and Consumer Engagement on Social Media Platforms,” SSRN, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4173537.
NazirAmbreenRaoYuanWuLianweiSunLing (2020), “Issues and Challenges of Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 13 (2), 845–63.
43.
NizalovaOlena Y.MurtazashviliIrina (2016), “Exogenous Treatment and Endogenous Factors: Vanishing of Omitted variable Bias on the Interaction Term,” Journal of Econometric Methods, 5 (1), 71–77.
44.
NussbaumA. DavidDweckCarol S. (2008), “Defensiveness Versus Remediation: Self-Theories and Modes of Self-Esteem Maintenance,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (5), 599–612.
45.
PageLawrenceBrinSergeyMotwaniRajeevWinogradTerry (1999), “The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web,” technical report, Stanford InfoLab.
46.
PariserEli (2011), The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin UK.
47.
PengJingAgarwalAshishHosanagarKartikIyengarRaghuram (2018), “Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (4), 571–85.
SchauHope JensenGillyMary C. (2003), “We Are What We Post? Self-Presentation in Personal Web Space,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (3), 385–404.
50.
SchoutenKimFrasincarFlaviusDekkerRommert (2016), “An Information Gain-Driven Feature Study for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis,” International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, 9612, 48–59.
51.
ShenWenqiLiuYanWangYun (2025), “Penalty or Reward? The Effect of Social Disincentives on Online Users’ Contributions,” Management Science, 71 (8), 6770–92.
52.
ShriverScott K.NairHarikesh S.HofstetterReto (2013), “Social Ties and User-Generated Content: Evidence from an Online Social Network,” Management Science, 59 (6), 1425–43.
53.
StroudNatalie Jomini (2008), “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure,” Political Behavior, 30 (3), 341–66.
54.
Strulov-ShlainAvner (2022), “More Than a Penny’s Worth: Left-Digit Bias and Firm Pricing,” Review of Economic Studies, 90 (5), 2612–45.
55.
SunsteinCass R. (2009), Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford University Press.
56.
TadelisSteven (2016), “Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets,” Annual Review of Economics, 8 (1), 321–40.
57.
ThomasManojMorwitzVicki (2005), “Penny Wise and Pound Foolish: The Left-Digit Effect in Price Cognition,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (1), 54–64.
58.
ToubiaOlivierStephenAndrew T. (2013), “Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?” Marketing Science, 32 (3), 368–92.
59.
Van DoornJennyLemonKatherine N.MittalVikasNassStephanPickDoreénPirnerPeterVerhoefPeter C. (2010), “Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (3), 253–66.
60.
WangYaoMajeedAbdul (2023), “How Do Users’ Feedback Influence Creators’ Contributions: An Empirical Study of an Online Music Community,” Behaviour & Information Technology, 42 (9), 1357–73.
61.
YoganarasimhanHemaIakovetskaiaIrina (2024), “From Feeds to Inboxes: A Comparative Study of Polarization in Facebook and Email News Sharing,” Management Science, 70 (9), 6461–72.
ZhangXiaoquanZhuFeng (2006), “Intrinsic Motivation of Open Content Contributors: The Case of Wikipedia,” Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, https://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/49038.
64.
ZhuKaiKhern-am nuaiWarutYuYinan (2025), “Negative Peer Feedback and User Content Generation: Evidence from a Restaurant Review Platform,” Production and Operations Management, 34 (12), 3814–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
