This research documents how introducing redemption tasks requiring a token (i.e., trivial) amount of effort—for instance, by asking the consumer to enter a promo code or solve a CAPTCHA to receive a discount—increases price promotion effectiveness compared with equivalent straight discounts (i.e., applied automatically). Eight studies (including two field experiments) and three additional Web Appendix studies provide robust evidence for the beneficial effect of token-effort requirements on redemption rates. This effect occurs because the easy-to-attain redemption task induces a high perceived return on effort. Thus, this effect only occurs when the redemption task requires token-type effort but not when it is effortful. This research offers costless and easy-to-implement managerial recommendations for boosting the promotional effectiveness of price promotions.
AllardThomasHardistyDavid J.GriffinDale (2019), “When ‘More’ Seems Like Less: Differential Price Framing Increases the Choice Share of Higher-Priced Options,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (5), 826–41.
2.
AxsomDannyCooperJoel (1985), “Cognitive Dissonance and Psychotherapy: The Role of Effort Justification in Inducing Weight Loss,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21 (2), 149–60.
3.
BabinBarry J.DardenWilliam R.GriffinMitch (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644–56.
4.
BellDavid R.ChiangJeongwenPadmanabhanV. (1999), “The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization,” Marketing Science, 18 (4), 504–26.
5.
BenozioAviDiesendruckGil (2015), “From Effort to Value: Preschool Children’s Alternative to Effort Justification,” Psychological Science, 26 (9), 1423–29.
6.
BiswasAbhijitBhowmickSandeepGuhaAbhijitGrewalDhruv (2013), “Consumer Evaluations of Sale Prices: Role of the Subtraction Principle,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (4), 49–66.
7.
BlattbergRobert C.NeslinScott A. (1990), Sales Promotions: Concepts, Methods and Strategies. Prentice Hall.
8.
BurtonScotLichtensteinDonald R.NetemeyerRichard G.GarretsonJudith A. (1998), “A Scale for Measuring Attitude Toward Private Label Products and an Examination of Its Psychological and Behavioral Correlates,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 293–306.
9.
CaiFengyanBagchiRajeshGauriDinesh K. (2016), “Boomerang Effects of Low Price Discounts: How Low Price Discounts Affect Purchase Propensity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (5), 804–16.
10.
CamererColin F.HogarthRobin M. (1999), “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19 (1), 7–42.
11.
ChandonPierreWansinkBrianLaurentGilles (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (4), 65–81.
12.
ChandranSucharitaMorwitzVicki G. (2006), “The Price of ‘Free’-dom: Consumer Sensitivity to Promotions with Negative Contextual Influences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (3), 384–92.
13.
ChenHaipeng (Allan)MarmorsteinHowardTsirosMichaelRaoAkshay R. (2012), “When More Is Less: The Impact of Base Value Neglect on Consumer Preferences for Bonus Packs Over Price Discounts,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 64–77.
14.
ChengYiminMukhopadhyayAnirbanSchriftRom Y. (2017), “Do Costly Options Lead to Better Outcomes? How the Protestant Work Ethic Influences the Cost–Benefit Heuristic in Goal Pursuit,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (4), 636–49.
15.
ClarkRonald A.ZbojaJames J.GoldsmithRonald E. (2013), “Antecedents of Coupon Proneness: A Key Mediator of Coupon Redemption,” Journal of Promotion Management, 19 (2), 188–210.
16.
CutrightKeisha M.SamperAdriana (2014), “Doing It the Hard Way: How Low Control Drives Preferences for High-Effort Products and Services,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3), 730–45.
17.
DallasSteven K.MorwitzVicki G. (2018), “‘There Ain’t No Such Thing as a Free Lunch’: Consumers’ Reactions to Pseudo-Free Offers,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (6), 900–915.
18.
DarkePeter R.DahlDarren W. (2003), “Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 328–38.
DolanRobert J. (1987), “Quantity Discounts: Managerial Issues and Research Opportunities,” Marketing Science, 6 (1), 1–22.
21.
FestingerLeon (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
22.
FiskeSusan T.TaylorShelley E. (1984), Social Cognition. McGraw-Hill.
23.
GalakJeffNelsonLeif D. (2011), “The Virtues of Opaque Prose: How Lay Beliefs About Fluency Influence Perceptions of Quality,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47 (1), 250–53.
24.
GarbarinoEllen C.EdellJulie A. (1997), “Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (2), 147–58.
GrewalDhruvKrishnanRamBakerJulieBorinNorm (1998), “The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 74 (3), 331–52.
27.
GrewalDhruvMarmorsteinHowardSharmaArun (1996), “Communicating Price Information Through Semantic Cues: The Moderating Effects of Situation and Discount Size,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (2), 148–55.
28.
GrewalDhruvMonroeKent B.KrishnanRamayya (1998), “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 46–59.
GuhaAbhijitBiswasAbhijitGrewalDhruvVermaSwatiBanerjeeSomakNordfältJens (2018), “Reframing the Discount as a Comparison Against the Sale Price: Does It Make the Discount More Attractive?” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (3), 339–51.
31.
GuptaSunilCooperLee G. (1992), “The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 401–11.
32.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed.Guilford Press.
33.
HeilmanCarrie M.NakamotoKentRaoAmbar G. (2002), “Pleasant Surprises: Consumer Response to Unexpected In-Store Coupons,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (2), 242–52.
34.
HockStefan J.BagchiRajeshAndersonThomas M. (2020), “Promotional Games Increase Consumer Conversion Rates and Spending,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (1), 79–99.
35.
HullClark Leonard (1943), Principles of Behavior. Appleton-Century.
36.
InmanJ. JeffreyPeterAnil C.RaghubirPriya (1997), “Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (1), 68–79.
37.
InzlichtMichaelShenhavAmitaiOlivolaChristopher Y. (2018), “The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22 (4), 337–49.
38.
JainShailendra PratapSlotegraafRebecca J.LindseyCharles D. (2007), “Towards Dimensionalizing Warranty Information: The Role of Consumer Costs of Warranty Redemption,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (1), 70–80.
39.
JiaHeHuangYunhuiZhangQiangShiZhengyuZhangKe (2024), “Final Price Neglect in Multi-Product Promotions: How Non-Integrated Price Reductions Promote Higher-Priced Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 50 (6), 1097–116.
40.
JoharGita Venkataramani (1995), “Consumer Involvement and Deception from Implied Advertising Claims,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (3), 267–79.
41.
KahnemanDaniel (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
42.
KardesFrank R.PosavacSteven S.SilveraDavidCronleyMaria L.SanbonmatsuDavid M.SchertzerSusanMillerFeliciaHerrPaul M.ChandrashekaranMurali (2006), “Debiasing Omission Neglect,” Journal of Business Research, 59 (6), 786–92.
43.
KardesFrank R.SanbonmatsuDavid M. (2003), “Omission Neglect: The Importance of Missing Information,” Skeptical Inquirer, 27 (2), 42–6.
44.
KelleyEugene J. (1958), “The Importance of Convenience in Consumer Purchasing,” Journal of Marketing, 23 (1), 32–38.
45.
KingDavid B.O’RourkeNormDeLongisAnita (2014), “Social Media Recruitment and Online Data Collection: A Beginner’s Guide and Best Practices for Accessing Low-Prevalence and Hard-to-Reach Populations,” Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 55 (4), 240–49.
46.
KirmaniAmnaRaoAkshay R. (2000), “No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (2), 66–79.
47.
KoolWouterMcGuireJoseph T.RosenZev B.BotvinickMatthew M. (2010), “Decision Making and the Avoidance of Cognitive Demand,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139 (4), 665–82.
48.
KramerThomasIrmakCaglarBlockLauren G.IlyukVeronika (2012), “The Effect of a No-Pain, No-Gain Lay Theory on Product Efficacy Perceptions,” Marketing Letters, 23 (3), 517–29.
49.
KrugerJustinWirtzDerrickVan BovenLeafAltermattT. William (2004), “The Effort Heuristic,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (1), 91–98.
50.
KurzbanRobert (2016), “The Sense of Effort,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 67–70.
51.
LichtensteinDonald R.NetemeyerRichard G.BurtonScot (1990), “Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (3), 54–67.
52.
NarasimhanChakravarthi (1984), “A Price Discrimination Theory of Coupons,” Marketing Science, 3 (2), 128–47.
53.
NortonMichael I.MochonDanielArielyDan (2012), “The IKEA Effect: When Labor Leads to Love,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (3), 453–60.
54.
PalmeiraMauricio M. (2011), “The Zero-Comparison Effect,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (1), 16–26.
55.
PalmeiraMauricio M.SrivastavaJoydeep (2013), “Free Offer ≠ Cheap Product: A Selective Accessibility Account on the Valuation of Free Offers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (4), 644–56.
RoggeveenAnne L.TsirosMichaelGrewalDhruv (2012), “Understanding the Co-Creation Effect: When Does Collaborating with Customers Provide a Lift to Service Recovery?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 771–90.
58.
SchindlerRobert M. (1998), “Consequences of Perceiving Oneself as Responsible for Obtaining a Discount: Evidence for Smart-Shopper Feelings,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7 (4), 371–92.
59.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 845–51.
60.
ThalerRichard (1983), “Transaction Utility Theory,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, BagozziRichard P.TyboutAlice M., eds. Association for Consumer Research, 229–32.
YinYunluHuangZhongqiang (Tak) (2022), “Social-Jetlagged Consumers and Decreased Conspicuous Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 49 (4), 616–33.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
