Despite growing concerns regarding the increasing consumerism related to promotions, this research documents a positive effect of price promotions on consumers’ donation behavior. Specifically, the authors propose that price promotions increase consumers’ perceived resources, which in turn increase consumers’ donation behavior. A series of seven studies, combining field and experimental data, provide converging support for this proposition and its underlying mechanism of perceived resources. Furthermore, the authors show that the positive effect of price promotions on consumers’ donation behavior is attenuated when consumers focus on the amount of money spent (rather than saved), when consumers feel they have overspent their budget, and when the monetary savings cannot be realized immediately. Finally, the authors show that this effect is stronger when donation solicitation occurs immediately after the price promotion (vs. after a delay). This research documents a novel behavioral consequence of price promotions and uncovers a mechanism by which price promotions can lead to positive social consequences and contribute to a better world.
AilawadiKusum L.GedenkKarenLutzkyChristianNeslinScott A. (2007), “Decomposition of the Sales Impact of Promotion-Induced Stockpiling,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (3), 450–67.
2.
AllardThomasHardistyDavid J.GriffinDale (2019), “When ‘More’ Seems Like Less: Differential Price Framing Increases the Choice Share of Higher-Priced Options,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (5), 826–41.
3.
AndreoniJamesNikiforakisNikosStoopJan (2017), “Are the Rich More Selfish Than the Poor, or Do They Just Have More Money? A Natural Field Experiment,” National Bureau of Economic Research, https://www.nber.org/papers/w23229.
4.
ArkesHal R.JoynerCynthia A.PezzoMark V.NashJane GradwohlSiegel-JacobsKarenStoneEric (1994), “The Psychology of Windfall Gains,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59 (3), 331–47.
5.
AshworthLaurenceDarkePeter R.SchallerMark (2005), “No One Wants to Look Cheap: Trade-Offs Between Social Disincentives and the Economic and Psychological Incentives to Redeem Coupons,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (4), 295–306.
6.
AshworthLaurenceMcShaneLindsay (2012), “Why Do We Care What Others Pay? The Effect of Other Consumers’ Prices on Inferences of Seller (Dis)Respect and Perceptions of Deservingness Violation,” Journal of Retailing, 88 (1), 145–55.
7.
BasilDebra Z.RidgwayNancy M.BasilMichael D. (2008), “Guilt and Giving: A Process Model of Empathy and Efficacy,” Psychology & Marketing, 25 (1), 1–23.
8.
BellDavid R.ChiangJeongwenPadmanabhanV. (1999), “The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization,” Marketing Science, 18 (4), 504–26.
9.
BermanJonathan Z.BhattacharjeeAmitSmallDeborah A.ZaubermanGal (2020), “Passing the Buck to the Wealthier: Reference-Dependent Standards of Generosity,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 157, 46–56.
10.
BlairEdward A.LandonE. LairdJr. (1981), “The Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing, 45 (2), 61–9.
11.
BlattbergRobert C.NeslinScott A. (1990), Sales Promotions: Concepts, Methods and Strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
CaiFengyanBagchiRajeshGauriDinesh K. (2016), “Boomerang Effects of Low Price Discounts: How Low Price Discounts Affect Purchase Propensity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (5), 804–16.
13.
CaiFengyanWyerRobert S.Jr (2015), “The Impact of Mortality Salience on the Relative Effectiveness of Donation Appeals,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 101–12.
14.
CavanaughLisa A.BettmanJames R.LuceMary Frances (2015), “Feeling Love and Doing More for Distant Others: Specific Positive Emotions Differentially Affect Prosocial Consumption,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (5), 657–73.
15.
ChandonPierreWansinkBrianLaurentGilles (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (4), 65–81.
16.
CoxeStefanyWestStephen G.AikenLeona S. (2009), “The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and Its Alternatives,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 91 (2), 121–36.
17.
DarkePeter R.ChungCindy M.Y. (2005), “Effects of Pricing and Promotion on Consumer Perceptions: It Depends on How You Frame It,” Journal of Retailing, 81 (1), 35–47.
18.
DeanDwane Hal (2003), “Consumer Perception of Corporate Donations Effects of Company Reputation for Social Responsibility and Type of Donation,” Journal of Advertising, 32 (4), 91–102.
19.
DickertStephanSagaraNamikaSlovicPaul (2011), “Affective Motivations to Help Others: A Two-Stage Model of Donation Decisions,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24 (4), 361–76.
20.
DovidioJohn F.PiliavinJane AllynSchroederDavid A.PennerLouis A. (2006), The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
DuclosRodBaraschAlixandra (2014), “Prosocial Behavior in Intergroup Relations: How Donor Self-Construal and Recipient Group-Membership Shape Generosity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (1), 93–108.
FajardoTatiana M.TownsendClaudiaBolanderWilly (2018), “Toward an Optimal Donation Solicitation: Evidence from the Field of the Differential Influence of Donor-Related and Organization-Related Information on Donation Choice and Amount,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (2), 142–52.
24.
ForehMark R.GrierSonya (2003), “When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 349–56.
GourvilleJohn T.SomanDilip (1998), “Payment Depreciation: The Behavioral Effects of Temporally Separating Payments from Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (2), 160–74.
27.
GrewalDhruvMonroeKent B.KrishnanR. (1998), “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 46–59.
28.
HavensJohn J.O’HerlihyMary A.SchervishPaul G. (2007), “Charitable Giving: How Much, by Whom, to What, and How?” in The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, PowellWalter W.SteinbergRichard, eds. London: Yale University Press, 542–67.
29.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications.
30.
HeathChipSollJack B. (1996), “Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (1), 40–52.
31.
HeilmanCarrie M.NakamotoKentRaoAmbar G. (2002), “Pleasant Surprises: Consumer Response to Unexpected In-Store Coupons,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (2), 242–52.
32.
IsenAlice M.LevinPaula F. (1972), “Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21 (3), 384–88.
KivetzRanSimonsonItamar (2002), “Self-Control for the Righteous: Toward a Theory of Precommitment to Indulgence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 199–217.
KorndörferMartinEgloffBorisSchmukleStefan C. (2015), “A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior,” PLoS One, 10 (7), e0133193.
37.
KrishnaAradhnaBrieschRichardLehmannDonald R.YuanHong (2002), “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Price Presentation on Perceived Savings,” Journal of Retailing, 78 (2), 101–18.
38.
KuporDaniellaTormalaZakary (2018), “When Moderation Fosters Persuasion: The Persuasive Power of Deviatory Reviews,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (3), 490–510.
LeeLeonardTsaiClaire I. (2014), “How Price Promotions Influence Postpurchase Consumption Experience over Time,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 943–59.
41.
LeeSaeromWinterichKaren PageRossWilliam T.Jr (2014), “I’m Moral, but I Won’t Help You: The Distinct Roles of Empathy and Justice in Donations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3), 678–96.
42.
LevontinLiatEin-GarDanitLeeAngela Y. (2015), “Acts of Emptying Promote Self-Focus: A Perceived Resource Deficiency Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (2), 257–67.
43.
LichtensteinDonald R.NetemeyerRichard G.BurtonScot (1990), “Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (3), 54–67.
44.
LyubomirskySonjaKingLauraDienerEd (2016), “The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success?” Psychological Bulletin, 131 (6), 803–55.
45.
MelaCarl F.GuptaSunilLehmannDonald R. (1997), “The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (2), 248–61.
46.
MukhopadhyayAnirbanJoharGita Venkataramani (2007), “Tempted or Not? The Effect of Recent Purchase History on Responses to Affective Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 445–53.
47.
PiffPaul K.KrausMichael W.CôtéStéphaneChengBonnie HaydenKeltnerDacher (2010), “Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (5), 771–84.
48.
RaghubirPriyaCorfmanKim (1999), “When Do Price Promotions Affect Pretrial Brand Evaluations?” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 211–22.
49.
ReedAmericusIIAquinoKarlLevyEric (2007), “Moral Identity and Judgments of Charitable Behaviors,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (1), 178–93.
50.
RouxCarolineGoldsmithKellyBonezziAndrea (2015), “On the Psychology of Scarcity: When Reminders of Resource Scarcity Promote Selfish (and Generous) Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (4), 615–31.
51.
SchindlerRobert M. (1998), “Consequences of Perceiving Oneself as Responsible for Obtaining a Discount: Evidence for Smart-Shopper Feelings,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7 (4), 371–92.
52.
ShadyFranklinLeeLeonard (2020), “Price Promotions Cause Impatience,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (1), 118–33.
53.
ShivBabaCarmonZivArielyDan (2005), “Placebo Effects of Marketing Actions: Consumers Get What They Pay For,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (4), 383–93.
54.
SoberElliottWilsonDavid Sloan (1999), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
StilleyKaren M.InmanJ. JeffreyWakefieldKirk L. (2010), “Spending on the Fly: Mental Budgets, Promotions, and Spending Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (3), 34–47.
56.
StrahilevitzMichalMyersJohn G. (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434–46.
VaradarajanP. RajanMenonAnil (1988), “Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 58–74.
60.
WhiteKatherinePelozaJohn (2009), “Self-Benefit Versus Other-Benefit Marketing Appeals: Their Effectiveness in Generating Charitable Support,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (4), 109–24.
61.
WiepkingPamalaBekkersRené (2012), “Who Gives? A Literature Review of Predictors of Charitable Giving II: Gender, Family Composition and Income,” Voluntary Sector Review, 3 (2), 217–45.
62.
WiepkingPamalaBreezeBeth (2012), “Feeling Poor, Acting Stingy: The Effect of Money Perceptions on Charitable Giving,” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17 (1), 13–24.
63.
WinterichKaren PageMittalVikasAquinoKarl (2013), “When Does Recognition Increase Charitable Behavior? Toward a Moral Identity-Based Model,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (3), 121–34.
64.
WinterichKaren PageMittalVikasRossWilliam T.Jr (2009), “Donation Behavior Toward In-Groups and Out-Groups: The Role of Gender and Moral Identity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (2), 199–214.
65.
YooBoongheeDonthuNaveenLeeSungho (2000), “An Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements and Brand Equity,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 195–211.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
