Influencer marketing, in which companies sponsor social media personalities to promote their brands, has exploded in popularity in recent years. One common criterion for selecting an influencer partner is popularity. While some firms collaborate with “mega” influencers with millions of followers, other firms partner with “micro” influencers with only several thousand followers, but who also cost less to sponsor. To quantify this trade-off between popularity and cost, the authors develop a framework for estimating the follower elasticity of impressions (FEI), which measures a video's percentage gain in impressions (i.e., views) corresponding to a percentage increase in the number of followers of its creator. Computing FEI involves estimating the causal effect of an influencer's popularity on the view counts of their videos, which is achieved through a combination of (1) a unique data set collected from TikTok, (2) a representation learning model for quantifying video content, and (3) a machine learning–based causal inference method. The authors find that FEI is always positive, averaging .10, but often nonlinearly related to follower size. They examine the factors that predict variation in these FEI curves and show how firms can use these results to better determine influencer partnerships.
AngristJoshua D.ImbensGuido W.RubinDonald B. (1996), “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91 (434), 444–55.
3.
AtheySusanTibshiraniJulieWagerStefan (2019), “Generalized Random Forests,” The Annals of Statistics, 47 (2), 1148–78.
CannonHugh M.LeckenbyJohn D.AbernethyAvery (2002), “Beyond Effective Frequency: Evaluating Media Schedules Using Frequency Value Planning,” Journal of Advertising Research, 42 (6), 33–46.
CentolaDamon (2010), “The Spread of Behavior in An Online Social Network Experiment,” Science, 329 (5996), 1194–97.
11.
DanaherPeter J.DaggerTracey S. (2013), “Comparing the Relative Effectiveness of Advertising Channels: A Case Study of a Multimedia Blitz Campaign,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (4), 517–34.
12.
DekimpeMarnik G.HanssensDominique M. (2007), “Advertising Response Models,” in The SAGE Handbook of Advertising, TellisGerard J.AmblerTim, eds. Sage Publications, 247–63.
13.
DewRyanAnsariAsimToubiaOlivier (2022), “Letting Logos Speak: Leveraging Multiview Representation Learning for Data-Driven Branding and Logo Design,” Marketing Science, 41 (2), 401–25.
DolanRebeccaConduitJodieFrethey-BenthamCatherineFahyJohnGoodmanSteve (2019), “Social Media Engagement Behavior: A Framework for Engaging Customers Through Social Media Content,” European Journal of Marketing, 53 (10), 2213–43.
16.
ErhanDumitruCourvilleAaronBengioYoshuaVincentPascal (2010), “Why Does Unsupervised Pre-Training Help Deep Learning?,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 201–08.
17.
FarrellJustine RappCampbellColinSandsSean (2022), “What Drives Consumers to Engage with Influencers?: Segmenting Consumer Response to Influencers: Insights for Managing Social-Media Relationships,” Journal of Advertising Research, 62 (1), 35–48.
18.
FarrellMax H.LiangTengyuanMisraSanjog (2021), “Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inference,” Econometrica, 89 (1), 181–213.
19.
FlodgrenGerdParmelliElenaDoumitGabyGattellariMelinaGrimshawJeremyO’BrienMary AnnEcclesMartin P. (2007), “Local Opinion Leaders: Effects on Professional Practice and Health Care Outcomes,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1 (1).
20.
GeyserWerner (2023a), “How Much Do YouTube Ads Cost? [Updated 2024 Guide],” Influencer Marketing Hub (November 15), https://influencermarketinghub.com/how-much-do-YouTube-ads-cost.
GoldenbergJacobHanSangmanLehmannDonald R.HongJae Weon (2009), “The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (2), 1–13.
23.
GordonBrett R.ZettelmeyerFlorianBhargavaNehaChapskyDan (2019), “A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook,” Marketing Science, 38 (2), 193–225.
24.
GranovetterMark S. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–80.
25.
GuoTongSriramS.ManchandaPuneet (2021), “The Effect of Information Disclosure on Industry Payments to Physicians,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (1), 115–40.
26.
HanssensDominique M (2018), “The Value of Empirical Generalizations in Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 6–8.
27.
HartfordJasonLewisGregLeyton-BrownKevinTaddyMatt (2017), “Deep IV: A Flexible Approach for Counterfactual Prediction,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 1414–23.
28.
HausmanJerry A. (1996), “Valuation of New Goods Under Perfect and Imperfect Competition,” in The Economics of New Goods, Timothy F. Bresnahan and Robert J. Gordon, eds. University of Chicago Press, 207–48.
HsuWei-NingZhangYuGlassJames (2017), “Learning Latent Representations for Speech Generation and Transformation,” Interspeech, 1273–7.
31.
HughesChristianSwaminathanVanithaBrooksGillian (2019), “Driving Brand Engagement through Online Social Influencers: An Empirical Investigation of Sponsored Blogging Campaigns,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (5), 78–96.
JohanssonJohny K. (1979), “Advertising and the S-Curve: A New Approach,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (3), 346–54.
34.
JonesJohn Philip (1995), “Single-Source Research Begins to Fulfill Its Promise,” Journal of Advertising Research, 35 (3), 9–17.
35.
KatonaZsoltZubcsekPeter PalSarvaryMiklos (2011), “Network Effects and Personal Influences: The Diffusion of an Online Social Network,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 425–43.
36.
KeatingNancy L.AyanianJohn Z.ClearyPaul D.MarsdenPeter V. (2007), “Factors Affecting Influential Discussions among Physicians: A Social Network Analysis of a Primary Care Practice,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22 (6), 794–98.
KuoDavidGiffordDavid R.SteinMichael D. (1998), “Curbside Consultation Practices and Attitudes Among Primary Care Physicians and Medical Subspecialists,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 280 (10), 905–09.
LeeDokyunHosanagarKartikNairHarikesh S. (2018), “Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook,” Management Science, 64 (11), 5105–31.
41.
LeungFine F.GuFlora F.LiYiweiZhangJonathan Z.PalmatierRobert W (2022), “Influencer Marketing Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (6), 93–115.
42.
LeungFine F.GuFlora F.PalmatierRobert W. (2022), “Online Influencer Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–26.
43.
LiXiShiMengzeWangXin Shane (2019), “Video Mining: Measuring Visual Information Using Automatic Methods,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36 (2), 216–31.
44.
Liu-ThompkinsYuping (2012), “Seeding Viral Content: The Role of Message and Network Factors,” Journal of Advertising Research, 52 (4), 465–78.
45.
LodishLeonard M.AbrahamMagidKalmensonStuartLivelsbergerJeanneLubetkinBethRichardsonBruceStevensMary Ellen (1995), “How TV Advertising Works: A Meta-analysis of 389 Real World Split Cable TV Advertising Experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (2), 125–39.
NeweyWhitney K.PowellJames L. (2003), “Instrumental Variable Estimation of Nonparametric Models,” Econometrica, 71 (5), 1565–78.
48.
ParkJiwoonLeeJi MinXiongVikki YiqiSeptiantoFelixSeoYuri (2021), “David and Goliath: When and Why Micro-Influencers Are More Persuasive than Mega-Influencers,” Journal of Advertising, 50 (5), 584–602.
49.
PearlJudea (2009), Causality. Cambridge University Press.
RaoAmbar G.MillerPeter B. (1975), “Advertising-Sales Response Functions,” Journal of Advertising Research, 15 (2), 7–15.
52.
RezendeDanilo JimenezMohamedShakirWierstraDaan (2014), “Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative Models,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1278–86.
53.
SethuramanRajTellisGerard J.BrieschRichard A. (2011), “How Well Does Advertising Work? Generalizations from Meta-Analysis of Brand Advertising Elasticities,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 457–71.
54.
ShapiroBradley T.HitschGünter J.TuchmanAnna E. (2021), “TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results from 288 Brands,” Econometrica, 89 (4), 1855–79.
55.
SimonJulian L.ArndtJohan (1980), “The Shape of the Advertising Response Function,” Journal of Advertising Research, 20 (4), 11–28.
56.
SusarlaAnjanaOhJeong-HaTanYong (2012), “Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube,” Information Systems Research, 23 (1), 23–41.
ToubiaOlivierStephenAndrew T. (2013), “Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?” Marketing Science, 32 (3), 368–92.
61.
TudónJosé (2022), “Distilling Network Effects from Steam,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 20 (3), 293–312.
62.
VakratsasDemetriosFeinbergFred M.BassFrank M.KalyanaramGurumurthy (2004), “The Shape of Advertising Response Functions Revisited: A Model of Dynamic Probabilistic Thresholds,” Marketing Science, 23 (1), 109–19.
63.
ValsesiaFrancescaProserpioDavideNunesJoseph C. (2020), “The Positive Effect of Not Following Others on Social Media,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (6), 1152–68.
64.
WiesSimoneBleierAlexanderEdelingAlexander (2023), “Finding Goldilocks Influencers: How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement,” Journal of Marketing, 87 (3), 383–405.
YaoRongLiuChongdangZhangLinxuanPengPeng (2019), “Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Using Variational Auto-Encoder Based Feature Extraction,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM). IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHM.2019.8819434.
67.
YoganarasimhanHema (2012), “Impact of Social Network Structure on Content Propagation: A Study Using YouTube Data,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10, 111–50.
68.
ZhangMengxiaLuoLan (2023), “Can Consumer-posted Photos Serve as a Leading Indicator of Restaurant Survival? Evidence from Yelp,” Management Science, 69 (1), 25–50.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
