This research documents systematic gender performance differences (GPD) at a top business school using a unique administrative data set and survey of students. The findings show that women’s grades are 11% of a standard deviation lower in quantitative courses than those of men with similar academic aptitude and demographics, and men’s grades are 23% of a standard deviation lower in nonquantitative courses than those of comparable women. The authors discuss and test for different reasons to explain this finding. They show that a female instructor significantly cuts down GPD for quantitative courses by raising the relative grades of female students. In addition, female instructors increase women’s interest and performance expectations in these courses and are perceived as role models by their female students. These results provide support for a gender stereotype process for GPD and show that faculty can serve as powerful exemplars to challenge gender stereotypes and increase student achievement. The authors discuss several important implications of these findings for business schools and for society.
AntecolHeatherErenOzkanOzbeklikSerkan (2014), “The Effect of Teacher Gender on Student Achievement in Primary School,” Journal of Labor Economics, 33 (1), 63–89.
2.
BanduraAlbert (1977), “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191–215.
3.
BertrandMarianneGoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F. (2010), “Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 (3), 228–55.
4.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M. (2017), “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations,” Journal of Economic Literature, 55 (3), 789–865.
5.
BordaloPedroCoffmanKatherineGennaioliNicolaShleiferAndrei (2019), “Beliefs About Gender,” American Economic Review, 109 (3), 739–73.
6.
BoucheyHeather A.HarterSusan (2005), “Reflected Appraisals, Academic Self-Perceptions, and Math/Science Performance During Early Adolescence,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (4), 673–86.
7.
BusseyKayBanduraAlbert (1999), “Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation,” Psychological Review, 106 (4), 676–713.
8.
CadinuMaraMaassAnneRosabiancaAlessandraKiesnerJeff (2005), “Why Do Women Underperform Under Stereotype Threat? Evidence for the Role of Negative Thinking,” Psychological Science, 16 (7), 572–78.
CarrellScott E.PageMarianne E.WestJames E. (2010), “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (3), 1101–44.
11.
CeciStephen J.GintherDonna K.KahnShulamitWilliamsWendy M. (2014), “Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15 (3), 75–141.
12.
DahlDarren W.SenguptaJaideepVohsKathleen D. (2009), “Sex in Advertising: Gender Differences and the Role of Relationship Commitment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (2) 215–31.
FennemaElizabethShermanJulia (1977), “Sexual Stereotyping and Mathematics Learning,” The Arithmetic Teacher, 24 (5), 369–72.
15.
FisherRobert J.DubeLaurette (2005), “Gender Differences in Responses to Emotional Advertising: A Social Desirability Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 850–58.
16.
FryerRoland G.JrLevittSteven D. (2010), “An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in Mathematics,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 (2), 210–40.
17.
GaoHuachaoMittalVikasZhangYinlong (2019), “The Differential Effect of Local–Global Identity Among Males and Females: The Case of Price Sensitivity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (1), 173–91.
18.
GilmartinShannonDensonNidaLiErikaBryantAlyssaAschbacherPamela (2007), “Gender Ratios in High School Science Departments: The Effect of Percent Female Faculty on Multiple Dimensions of Students’ Science Identities,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (7), 980–1009.
19.
GongJieLuYiSongHong (2018), “The Effect of Teacher Gender on Students’ Academic and Noncognitive Outcomes,” Journal of Labor Economics, 36 (3), 743–78.
20.
GovidRahulGargNitikaMittalVikas (2020), “Weather, Affect, and Preference for Hedonic Products: The Moderating Role of Gender,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (4), 717–38.
21.
GriffithAmanda L. (2014), “Faculty Gender in the College Classroom: Does It Matter for Achievement and Major Choice?” Southern Economic Journal, 81 (1), 211–31.
22.
GrohmannBianca (2009), “Gender Dimensions of Brand Personality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (1), 105–19.
23.
HoffmanFlorianOreopoulosPhilip (2009), “A Professor Like Me: The Influence of Professor Gender on College Achievement,” NBER Working Paper 13182, National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
HsiehChang-TaiHurstErikJonesCharles I.KlenowPeter J. (2019), “The Allocation of Talent and US Economic Growth,” Econometrica, 87 (5), 1439–74.
25.
HuberthMadelineChenPatriciaTritzJaredMcKayTimothy (2015), “Computer-Tailored Student Support in Introductory Physics,” PLoS One, 10 (9), e0137001.
26.
HydeJanet ShibleyFennemaElizabethRyanMarilynFrostLaurie A.HoppCarolyn (1990), “Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14 (3), 299–324.
27.
JohnsonIryna Y. (2014), “Female Faculty Role Models and Student Outcomes: A Caveat About Aggregation,” Research in Higher Education, 55 (7), 686–709.
28.
KahnShulamitGintherDonna (2017), “Women and STEM,” NBER Working Paper 23525, National Bureau of Economic Research.
29.
KoesterBenjaminGromGalinaMcKayTimothy (2016), “Patterns of Gendered Performance Difference in Introductory Stem Courses,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07565.
KostLauren E.PollockSteven J.FinkelsteinNoah D. (2009), “Characterizing the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics,” Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 5 (1), 010101.
32.
KriegJohn M. (2005), “Student Gender and Teacher Gender: What Is the Impact on High Stakes Test Scores,” Current Issues in Education, 8, 1–16.
33.
LavyVictorSandEdith (2015), “On the Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases,” NBER Working Paper 20909, National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
LeinhardtGaeaSeewaldAndrea M.EngelMary (1979), “Learning What’s Taught: Sex Differences in Instruction,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 432–39.
35.
LimJaegeumMeerJonathan (2017), “The Impact of Teacher-Student Gender Matches: Random Assignment Evidence from South Korea,” Journal of Human Resources, 52 (4), 979–97.
36.
LippaRichard (1998), “Gender-Related Individual Differences and the Structure of Vocational Interests: The Importance of the People-Things Dimension,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (4), 996–1009.
37.
LippaRichard A. (2010), “Gender Differences in Personality and Interests: When, Where, and Why?” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4 (11), 1098–1110.
38.
LorenzoMercedesCrouchCatherine H.MazurEric (2006), “Reducing the Gender Gap in the Physics Classroom,” American Journal of Physics, 74 (2), 118–22.
39.
MachinStephenMcNallySandra (2005), “Gender and Student Achievement in English Schools,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21 (3), 357–72.
40.
MachinStephenPekkarinenTuomas (2008), “Global Sex Differences in Test Score Variability,” Science, 322 (5906), 1331–32.
Meyers-LevyJoanLokenBarbara (2015), “Revisiting Gender Differences: What We Know and What Lies Ahead,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 129–49.
43.
MiyakeAkiraKost-SmithLaurenFinkelsteinNoahPollockStevenCohenGeoffreyItoTiffany (2010), “Reducing the Gender Achievement Gap in College Science: A Classroom Study of Values Affirmation,” Science, 330 (6008), 1234–37.
44.
OstBen (2010), “The Role of Peers and Grades in Determining Major Persistence in the Sciences,” Economics of Education Review, 29 (6), 923–34.
45.
OysermanDaphnaFrybergStephanie A.YoderNicholas (2007), “Identity-Based Motivation and Health,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (6), 1011.
46.
PuhaniPatrick A. (2018), “Do Boys Benefit from Male Teachers in Elementary School? Evidence from Administrative Panel Data,” Labour Economics, 51, 340–54.
47.
RodriguezNixaliz (2002), “Gender Differences in Disciplinary Approaches,” ERIC WP ED468259.
48.
SaxLinda J. (2001), “Undergraduate Science Majors: Gender Differences in Who Goes to Graduate School,” Review of Higher Education, 24 (2), 153–72.
49.
ShihMargaretPittinskyTodd L.AmbadyNalini (1999), “Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance,” Psychological Science, 10 (1), 80–83.
50.
SolankiSabrina M.XuDi (2018), “Looking Beyond Academic Performance: The Influence of Instructor Gender on Student Motivation in Stem Fields,” American Educational Research Journal, 55 (4), 801–35.
51.
SpencerSteven J.SteeleClaude M.QuinnDiane M. (1999), “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35 (1), 4–28.
52.
StakeJayne E.KatzJonathan F. (1982), “Teacher-Pupil Relationships in the Elementary School Classroom: Teacher-Gender and Pupil-Gender Differences,” American Educational Research Journal, 19 (3), 465–71.
53.
SteeleClaude M. (1997), “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance,” American Psychologist, 52 (6), 613–29.
54.
SteeleClaude M.AronsonJoshua (1995), “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (5), 797–811.
55.
SuRongRoundsJamesArmstrongPatrick Ian (2009), “Men and Things, Women and People: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Interests,” Psychological Bulletin, 135 (6), 859.
U.S. Department of Education (2018), Digest of Education Statistics 2017, NCES2018-070.
58.
WintersMarcusHaightRobertSwaimThomasPickeringKatarzyna (2013), “The Effect of Same-Gender Teacher Assignment on Student Achievement in the Elementary and Secondary Grades: Evidence from Panel Data,” Economics of Education Review, 34, 69–75.
59.
XuDiLiQiujie (2018), “Gender Achievement Gaps Among Chinese Middle School Students and the Role of Teachers’ Gender,” Economics of Education Review, 67, 82–93.
60.
ZafarBasit (2013), “College Major Choice and the Gender Gap,” Journal of Human Resources, 48 (3), 545–95.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
