The authors propose a new Bayesian synthetic control framework to overcome limitations of extant synthetic control methods (SCMs). The proposed Bayesian synthetic control methods (BSCMs) do not impose any restrictive constraints on the parameter space a priori. Moreover, they provide statistical inference in a straightforward manner as well as a natural mechanism to deal with the “large p, small n” and sparsity problems through Markov chain Monte Carlo procedures. Using simulations, the authors find that for a variety of data-generating processes, the proposed BSCMs almost always provide better predictive accuracy and parameter precision than extant SCMs. They demonstrate an application of the proposed BSCMs to a real-world context of a tax imposed on soda sales in Washington state in 2010. As in the simulations, the proposed models outperform extant models, as measured by predictive accuracy in the posttreatment periods. The authors find that the tax led to an increase of 5.7% in retail price and a decrease of 5.5%∼5.8% in sales. They also find that retailers in Washington overshifted the tax to consumers, leading to a pass-through rate of approximately 121%.
AbadieAlbertoGardeazabalJavier (2003, March), “The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country,” American Economic Review, 93 (1), 113–32.
2.
AbadieAlbertoDiamondAlexisHainmuellerJens (2010), “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (490), 493–505.
3.
AbadieAlbertoDiamondAlexisHainmuellerJens (2011), “Synth: An R Package for Synthetic Control Methods in Comparative Case Studies. Journal of Statistical Software, 42 (13), 1–17.
4.
AbadieAlbertoDiamondAlexisHainmuellerJens (2015), “Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method,” American Journal of Political Science, 59 (2), 495–510.
5.
AtheySusanImbensGuido W. (2017), “The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), 3–32.
6.
Ben-MichaelEliFellerAviRothsteinJesse (2018), “The Augmented Synthetic Control Method,” arXiv:1811.04170 [econ, stat]. arXiv: 1811.04170.
7.
BollingerBryanSextonSteven (2018), “Local Excise Taxes, Sticky Prices, and Spillovers: Evidence from Berkeley’s Soda Tax,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3087966, Social Science Research Network.
8.
BrodersenKay H.GallusserFabianKoehlerJimRemyNicolasScottSteven L. (2015), “Inferring Causal Impact Using Bayesian Structural Time-Series Models,” Annals of Applied Statistics, 9 (1), 247–74.
9.
CardDavidKruegerAlan B. (1994), “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,” American Economic Review, 84 (4), 772–93.
10.
CarpenterBobGelmanAndrewHoffmanMatthew D.LeeDanielGoodrichBenBetancourtMichael, et al. (2017), “Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language,” Journal of Statistical Software, 76 (1), 1–32.
11.
CarvalhoCarlos M.MasiniRicardoMedeirosMarcelo C. (2018, December), “ArCo: An Artificial Counterfactual Approach for High-dimensional Panel Time-series Data,” Journal of Econometrics, 207 (2), 352–80.
12.
CarvalhoCarlos M.PolsonNicholas G.ScottJames G. (2010), “The Horseshoe Estimator for Sparse Signals,” Biometrika, 97 (2), 465–80.
13.
ChatterjeeA.LahiriS.N. (2011), “Bootstrapping Lasso Estimators,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106 (494), 608–25.
14.
ChatterjeeA.LahiriS. N. (2013), “Rates of Convergence of the Adaptive LASSO Estimators to the Oracle Distribution and Higher Order Refinements by the Bootstrap,” Annals of Statistics, 41 (3), 1232–59.
15.
ChesnesMatthewDaiWeijia DaisyJinG. Zhe (2017), “Banning Foreign Pharmacies from Sponsored Search: The Online Consumer Response,” Marketing Science, 36 (6), 879–907.
16.
ChungYeojinRabe-HeskethSophiaDorieVincentGelmanAndrewLiuJingchen (2013), “A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models,” Psychometrika, 78 (4), 685–709.
17.
DoudchenkoNickImbensGuido W. (2016), “Balancing, Regression, Difference-In-Differences and Synthetic Control Methods: A Synthesis,” Working Paper 22791, National Bureau of Economic Research, http://www.nber.org/papers/w22791.
18.
FermanBrunoPintoCristine (2016), “Revisiting the Synthetic Control Estimator,” working paper.
19.
FirpoSergioPossebomVitor (2018), “Synthetic Control Method: Inference, Sensitivity Analysis and Confidence Sets,” Journal of Causal Inference, 6 (2), 1–26.
20.
FonsecaYuri R.MasiniRicardo P.MedeirosMarcelo C.VasconcelosGabriel F.R. (2018), “ArCo: An R Package to Estimate Artificial Counterfactuals,” R Journal, 10 (1), 91–108.
21.
GardeazabalJavierVegaAinhoa B. (2017), “An Empirical Comparison Between the Synthetic Control Method and HSIAO et al.’s Panel Data Approach to Program Evaluation,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32 (5), 983–1002.
22.
GelmanAndrewJakulinAleksPittauMaria G.SuYu-Sung (2008), “A Weakly Informative Default Prior Distribution for Logistic and Other Regression Models,” Annals of Applied Statistics, 2 (4), 1360–83.
23.
GelmanAndrewCarlinJohn B.SternHal S.DunsonDavid B.VehtariAkiRubinDonald B. (2013), Bayesian Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
24.
GeorgeEdward I.McCullochRobert E. (1993), “Variable Selection Via Gibbs Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88 (423), 881–89.
25.
HahnJinyongShiRuoyao (2017), “Synthetic Control and Inference,” Econometrics, 5 (4), 52.
26.
HastieTrevorTibshiraniRobertWainwrightMartin (2015), Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations. 1st ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
27.
HsiangT.C. (1975), “A Bayesian View on Ridge Regression,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 24 (4), 267–68.
28.
HsiaoChengChingH. SteveWanShui Ki (2012), “A Panel Data Approach for Program Evaluation: Measuring the Benefits of Political and Economic Integration of Hong Kong with Mainland China,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27 (5), 705–40.
29.
IshwaranHemantRaoJ. Sunil (2005), “Spike and Slab Variable Selection: Frequentist and Bayesian Strategies,” Annals of Statistics, 33 (2), 730–73.
30.
KaulAshokKlöÿnerStefanPfeiferGregorSchielerManuel (2015), “Synthetic Control Methods: Never Use All Pre-Intervention Outcomes Together With Covariates,” working paper.
31.
KnightKeithFuWenjiang (2000), “Asymptotics for Lasso-Type Estimators,” Annals of Statistics, 28 (5), 1356–78.
32.
KruschkeJohn K. (2014), Doing Bayesian Data Analysis, Second Edition: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan, 2nd ed. Boston: Academic Press.
33.
KyungMinjungGillJeffGhoshMalayCasellaGeorge (2010), “Penalized Regression, Standard Errors, and Bayesian Lassos,” Bayesian Analysis, 5 (2), 369–411.
34.
LiKathleen T. (2019), “Statistical Inference for Average Treatment Effects Estimated by Synthetic Control Methods,” Journal of the American Statistical Association(published online December 9), DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1686986.
MallickHimelYiNengjun (2013), “Bayesian Methods for High Dimensional Linear Models,” Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics, 1, 005.
37.
MaxwellScott E.KelleyKenRauschJoseph R. (2008), “Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter Estimation,” Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 537–63.
38.
McElreathRichard (2015), Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
39.
MitchellT.J.BeauchampJ.J. (1988), “Bayesian Variable Selection in Linear Regression,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 (404), 1023–32.
40.
ParkTrevorCasellaGeorge (2008), “The Bayesian Lasso,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103 (482), 681–86.
41.
PiironenJuhoVehtariAki (2017), “Sparsity Information and Regularization in the Horseshoe and Other Shrinkage Priors,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, 11 (2), 5018–51.
42.
PowellD. (2018), “Imperfect Synthetic Controls: Did the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Save Lives?” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3192710, Social Science Research Network.
43.
RobertoChristina A.LawmanHannah G.LeVasseurMichael T.MitraNanditaPeterhansAnaHerringBradley, et al. (2019), “Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting,” JAMA, 321 (18), 1799–810.
44.
RojasChristianWangEmily Y. (2017), “Do Taxes for Soda and Sugary Drinks Work? Scanner Data Evidence from Berkeley and Washington,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3041989, Social Science Research Network.
45.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B. (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70 (1), 41–55.
46.
SeilerStephanTuchmanAnnaYaoSong (2019), “The Impact of Soda Taxes: Pass-Through, Tax Avoidance, and Nutritional Effects,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3302335, Social Science Research Network.
47.
SilverLynn D.NgShu WenRyan-IbarraSuzanneTaillieLindsey S.InduniMartaMilesDonna R. (2017), “Changes in Prices, Sales, Consumer Spending, and Beverage Consumption One Year After a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A Before-and-After Study,” PLoS Medicine, 14 (4), e1002283.
48.
TirunillaiSeshadriTellisGerard J. (2017), “Does Offline TV Advertising Affect Online Chatter? Quasi-Experimental Analysis Using Synthetic Control,” Marketing Science, 36 (6), 862–78.
49.
Van ErpSaraOberskiDaniel L.MulderJoris (2019), “Shrinkage Priors for Bayesian Penalized Regression,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 89 (April), 31–50.
50.
VehtariAkiGelmanAndrewGabryJonah (2017), “Practical Bayesian Model Evaluation Using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation and WAIC,” Statistics and Computing, 27 (5), 1413–32.
51.
XuY. (2017), “Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models,” Political Analysis, 25 (1), 57–76.
52.
ZouHuiHastieTrevor (2005), “Regularization and Variable Selection via the Elastic Net,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67 (2), 301–20.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
