The authors investigate the role of political ideology in consumer reactions to consumption regulations. First, they demonstrate via a natural experiment that conservatives (but not liberals) increase usage of mobile phones in cars after a law was enacted prohibiting that activity (Study 1). Then, through three lab experiments the authors illustrate that after consumers are exposed to consumption regulations from the government (e.g., laws that restrict consumption, warning labels designed by the Food and Drug Administration), conservatives (vs. liberals) are more likely to (1) use phones when restricted (Study 2), (2) purchase unhealthy foods (Study 3), and (3) view smoking e-cigarettes more favorably (Study 4). No such effects are observed when a nongovernment source is used, or when the message from the government is framed as a notification (vs. warning). These findings point to the important roles of political ideology and the message source in increasing reactance to consumption regulations, thereby mitigating the effectiveness of public policy initiatives undertaken by the government.
AltemeyerBob (1981), Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
3.
BobbioNorberto (1996), Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BrehmJack W. (1966), A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
5.
BrehmJack W. (1989), “Psychological Reactance: Theory and Applications,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 16, SrullThomas K., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research; 72–75.
6.
BrehmSharon S.BrehmJack W. (1981), Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press.
7.
BurgoonMichaelAlvaroEusebio M.BroneckKatherineMillerClaudeJosephR. GrandpreHallJohn R.FrankCynthia A. (2002), “Using Interactive Media Tools to Test Substance Abuse Prevention Messages,” in Mass Media and Drug Prevention: Classic and Contemporary Theories and Research, CrannoWilliam D.BurgoonMichaelOskamStuart, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 67–87.
8.
BushmanBrad J.StackAngela D. (1996), “Forbidden Fruit Versus Tainted Fruit: Effects of Warning Labels on Attraction to Television Violence,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2 (3), 207–26.
9.
CampbellTroy H.KayAaron C. (2014), “Solution Aversion: On the Relation Between Ideology and Motivated Disbelief,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (5), 809–24.
10.
CarneyDana R.JostJohn T.GoslingSamuel D.PotterJeff (2008), “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind,” Political Psychology, 29 (6), 807–40.
CleeMona A.WicklundRobert A. (1980), “Consumer Behavior and Psychological Reactance,” Journal of Consumer Research, 6 (4), 389–405.
14.
CohenGeoffrey L. (2003), “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (5), 808–22.
15.
CrawfordJarret T.BrandtMark J.InbarYoelChambersJohn R.MotylMatt (2017), “Social and Economic Ideologies Differentially Predict Prejudice Across the Political Spectrum, Bot Social Issues are Most Divisive,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112 (3), 383–412.
16.
CullenKaren A.AmbroseBridget K.GentzkeAndrea S.ApelbergBenjamin J.JamalAhmedKingBrian A. (2018), “Use of Electronic Cigarettes and Any Tobacco Product Among Middle and High School Students—United States 2011–2018,” MMR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67, 1276−77.
17.
DurrheimKevin (1997), “Theoretical Conundrum: The Politics and Science of Theorizing Authoritarian Cognition,” Political Psychology, 18 (3), 625–47.
18.
Erceg-HurnD. M. (2008), “Drugs, Money, and Graphic Ads: A Critical Review of the Montana Meth Project,” Prevention Science, 9 (4), 256–63.
19.
FibertZigiResslerWilliam Harris (1998), “Intolerance of Ambiguity and Political Orientation Among Israeli University Students,” Journal of Social Psychology, 138 (1), 33–40.
20.
FitzsimonsGavan J.LehmannDonald R. (2004), “Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses,” Marketing Science, 23 (1), 82–94.
21.
GrahamJesseNosekBrian A.HaidtJonathanIyerRaviKolevaSpassenaDittoPeter H. (2011), “Mapping the Moral Domain,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (2), 366–85.
22.
GrahamJesseHaidtJonathanNosekBrian A. (2009), “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (5), 1029–46.
23.
GrandpreJosephAlvaroEusebio M.BurgoonMichaelMillerClaude H.HallJohn R. (2003), “Adolescent Reactance and Anti-Smoking Campaigns: A Theoretical Approach,” Health Communication, 15 (3), 349–66.
24.
GraupmannVerenaJonasEvaMeierEsterHawelkaStefanAichhornMarkus (2012), “Reactance, the Self, and its Group: When Threats to Freedom Come from the Ingroup versus the Outgroup,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 42 (2), 164–73.
25.
GrinsteinAmirKronrodAnn (2016), “Does Sparing the Rod Spoil the Child? How Praising, Scolding, and an Assertive Tone Can Encourage Desired Behaviors,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (3), 433–41.
26.
GrometDena M.KunreutherHowardLarrickRichard P. (2013) “Political Ideology Affects Energy-Efficiency Attitudes and Choices,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (23), 9314–19.
27.
GrynbaumMichael M. (2012), “Health Panel Approves Restriction on Sale of Large Sugary Drinks,” The New York Times, September 14, 2012, A24.
28.
HalesCraig M.CarrollMargaret D.FyarCheryl D.OgdenCynthia L. (2017), “Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015–2016,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
29.
HayesAndrew F. (2013), An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
30.
HongSugn-MookFaeddaSalvatora (1996), “Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56 (1), 173–82.
31.
HornikRobertJacobsohnLelaOrwinRobertPiesseAndreaKaltonGraham (2008), “Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on Youths,” American Journal of Public Health, 98 (12), 2229–36.
InvernizziFedericaFalomir-PichastorJuan ManuelMunoz-RojasDanielMugnyGabriel (2003), “Social Influence in Personally Relevant Contexts: The Respect Attributed to the Source as a Factor of Increasing Smokers’ Intention to Quit Smoking,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33 (9), 1818–36.
34.
IyerRaviKolevaSpassenaGrahamJessDittoPeterHaidtJonathan (2012), “Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians,” PloS One, 7 (8), e42366.
35.
JohnsonPalmer O.NeymanJerzy (1936), “Tests of Certain Linear Hypotheses and Their Application to Some Educational Problems,” Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
36.
JostJohn T. (2006), “The End of the End of Ideology,” American Psychologist, 61 (7), 651–70.
37.
JostJohn T. (2017), “The Marketplace of Ideology: ‘Elective Affinities’ in Political Psychology and Their Implications for Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (4), 502–20.
38.
JostJohn T.NosekBrian A.GoslingSamuel D. (2008) “Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology,”Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (2), 126–36.
39.
JostJohn T.GlaserJackKruglanskiArie W.SullowayFrank J. (2003), “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition,” Psychological Bulletin, 129 (3), 339–75.
40.
JungKijuGarbarinoEllenBrileyDonnel A.WynhausenJesse (2017), “Blue and Red Voices: Effects of Political Ideology on Consumers’ Complaining and Disputing Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 477–99.
41.
KahanDan (2010), “Fixing the Communication Failure,” Nature, 463 (7279), 296–97.
42.
KangYong-SoonHerrPaul M. (2006), “Beauty and the Beholder: Toward an Integrative Model of Communication Source Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 123–30.
KerlingerFred N. (1984), Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45.
KidwellBlairFarmerAdamHardestyDavid M. (2013), “Getting Liberals and Conservatives to Go Green: Political Ideology and Congruent Appeals,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 350–67.
46.
KronrodAnnGrinsteinAmirWathieuLuc (2012), “Go Green! Should Environmental Messages Be So Assertive?” Journal of Marketing, 76 (1), 95–102.
47.
LaurinKristinKayAaron C.FitzsimonsGavan J. (2012), “Reactance Versus Rationalization: Divergent Responses to Policies That Constrain Freedom,” Psychological Science, 23 (2), 205–9.
48.
LevavJonathanZhuRui Juliet (2009) “Seeking Freedom Through Variety,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (4), 600–10.
49.
MiyazakiAnthony D.RodriguezAlexandra AguirreLangenderferJeff (2009) “Price, Scarcity, and Consumer Willingness to Purchase Pirated Media Products,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28 (1), 71–84.
50.
MurdockMitchel R.RajagopalPriyali (2017), “The Sting of Social: How Emphasizing Social Consequences in Warning Messages Influences Perceptions of Risk,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (2), 83–98.
51.
NailPaul R.McGregorIanDrinkwaterApril E.SteeleGarret M.ThompsonAnthony W. (2009), “Threat Causes Liberals to Think Like Conservatives,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 901–907.
PaveyLouisaSparksPaul (2009), “Reactance, Autonomy and Paths to Persuasion: Examining Perceptions of Threats to Freedom and Informational Value,” Motivation and Emotion, 33 (3), 277–90.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models,” Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–91.
56.
QuickBrian L.StephensonMichael T. (2008), “Examining the Role of Trait Reactance and Sensation Seeking on Perceived Threat, State Reactance, and Reactance Restoration,” Health Communication Research, 34 (3), 448–76.
57.
RaoAnitaWangEmily (2017), “Demand for ‘Healthy’ Products: False Claims and FTC Regulation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (6), 968–89.
RingoldD. J. (2002), “Boomerang Effects in Response to Public Health Interventions: Some Unintended Consequences in the Alcoholic Beverage Market,” Journal of Consumer Policy, 25 (1), 27–63.
SpillerStephenFitzsimonsGavanLynchJohnJrMcClellandGary (2013), “Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (2), 277–88.
64.
TedinKent L. (1987), “Political Ideology and the Vote,” Research in Micropolitics, 2 (1), 63–94.
65.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018), “Shares of Gross Domestic Product: Personal Consumption Expenditures,” (Retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Nov 12, 2018), [https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DPCERE1Q156NBEA].
WansinkBrianChandonPierre (2006), “Can ‘Low-Fat’ Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity?” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (4), 605–17.
70.
WicklundRobert A. (1974), Freedom and Reactance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71.
WinterichKaren PageZhangYinlongMittalVikas (2012), “How Political Identity and Charity Positioning Increase Donations: Insights from Moral Foundations Theory,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (4), 346–54.
72.
WitteK.AllenM. (2000), “A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns,” Health Education and Behavior, 27 (5), 591–615.
73.
WolburgJ. M. (2006), “College Students’ Response to Antismoking Messages: Denial, Defiance, and Other Boomerang Effects,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 40 (2), 294–323.
74.
WorchelStephenBrehmJack W. (1970), “Effect of Threats to Attitudinal Freedom as a Function of Agreement with the Communicator,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14 (1), 18–22.
75.
Zemack-RugarYaelMooreSarah G.FitzsimonsGavan J. (2017), “Just Do It! Why Committed Consumers React Negatively to Assertive Ads,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (3), 287–301.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
