Native advertising is a type of online advertising that matches the form and function of the platform on which it appears. In practice, the choice between display and in-feed native advertising presents brand advertisers and online news publishers with conflicting objectives. Advertisers face a trade-off between ad clicks and brand recognition, whereas publishers need to strike a balance between ad clicks and the platform’s trustworthiness. For policy makers, concerns that native advertising confuses customers prompted the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to issue guidelines for disclosing native ads. This research aims to understand how consumers respond to native ads versus display ads and to different styles of native ad disclosures, using randomized online and field experiments combining behavioral clickstream, eye movement, and survey response data. The results show that when the position of an ad on a news page is controlled for, a native ad generates a higher click-through rate because it better resembles the surrounding editorial content. However, a display ad leads to more visual attention, brand recognition, and trustworthiness for the website than a native ad.
AllenbyGreg M.EdwardsYancy (2003), “Multivariate Analysis of Multiple Response Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (3), 321–34.
3.
BakshiAmar C. (2015), “Why and How to Regulate Native Advertising in Online News Publications,” Journal of Media Law and Ethics, 4 (3/4), 4–46.
4.
BaltasGeorge (2003), “Determinants of Internet Advertising Effectiveness: An Empirical Study,” International Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (4), 505–13.
5.
Becker-OlsenKaren L. (2003), “And Now, a Word from Our Sponsor—A Look at the Effects of Sponsored Content and Banner Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 32 (2), 17–31.
BenwayJan Panero (1998), “Banner Blindness: The Irony of Attention Grabbing on the World Wide Web,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 42 (5), 463–67.
8.
BriggsRexHollisNigel (1997), “Advertising on the Web: Is There Response Before Click-Through?” Journal of Advertising Research, 37 (2), 33–40.
9.
BürknerP. C. (2017), “Brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan,” Journal of Statistical Software, 80 (1), 1–28.
10.
CasalóLuis V.FlaviánCarlosGuinalíuMiguel (2011), “The Generation of Trust in the Online Services and Product Distribution: The Case of Spanish Electronic Commerce,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12 (3), 199–213.
11.
ChandonJean LouisChtourouMohamed SaberFortinDavid R. (2003), “Effects of Configuration and Exposure Levels on Responses to Web Advertisements,” Journal of Advertising Research, 43 (2), 217–29.
12.
ChatterjeePatraliHoffmanDonna L.NovakThomas (2003), “Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts,” Marketing Science, 22 (4), 520–41.
13.
DarkePeter R.RitcheRobin J. B. (2007), “The Defensive Consumer: Advertising Deception, Defensive Processing, and Distrust,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (1), 114–47.
DragansakaMichaelaHartmannWesley R.StangleinGena (2014), “Internet Versus Television Advertising: A Brand-Building Comparison,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (5), 578–90.
16.
DrézeXavierHussherrFrançois-Xavier (2003), “Internet Advertising: Is Anybody Watching?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17 (4), 8–23.
17.
EdelmanBenjaminGilchristDuncan S. (2012), “Advertising Disclosures: Measuring Labeling Alternatives in Internet Search Engines,” Information Economics and Policy, 24 (1) 75–89.
18.
EllisStephen R.SmithJames Darrell (1985), “Patterns of Statistical Dependency in Visual Scanning,” in Eye Movements and Human Information Processing, Rudolf Groner et al., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV.
JiangMengtianMcKayBrigitte A.RichardsJef I.SnyderWally (2017), “Now You See Me, But You Don’t Know: Consumer Processing of Native Advertisements in Online News Sites,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17 (2), 92–109.
25.
KimSeunghyunYounSeounmiYoonDoyle (2019), “Consumers’ Responses to Native vs. Banner Advertising: Moderation of Persuasion Knowledge on Interaction Effects of Ad Type and Placement Type,” International Journal of Advertising, 38 (2), 207–36.
26.
KimSunny JungHancockJeffrey T. (2017), “How Advertorials Deactivate Advertising Schema: MTurk-Based Experiments to Examine Persuasion Tactics and Outcomes in Health Advertisements,” Communication Research, 44 (7), 1019–45.
27.
KrouwerSimonePoelsKarolienPaulussenSteve (2017), “To Disguise or to Disclose: The Influence of Disclosure Recognition and Brand Presence on Readers’ Responses Toward Native Advertisements in Online News Media,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17 (2), 124–37.
LokenBarbaraRossIvanHinkleRonald L. (1986), “Consumer ‘Confusion’ of Origin and Brand Similarity Perceptions,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 5 (1), 195–211.
NosofskyRobert M. (1987), “Attention and Learning Processes in the Identification and Categorization of Integral Stimuli,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13 (1), 87–108.
32.
ObermillerCarlSpangenbergEric R. (1998), “Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Towards Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7 (2), 159–86.
33.
ParkhurstDerrickLawKlintonNieburErnst (2002), “Modeling the Role of Salience in the Allocation of Overt Visual Attention,” Vision Research, 42 (1), 107–23.
34.
PietersRikWedelMichel (2004), “Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (2), 36–50.
35.
PietersRikRosbergenEdwardWedelMichel (1999), “Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (4), 424–38.
RaynerKeith (1995), “Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception,” in Studies in Visual Information Processing, Vol 6, Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications, FindlayJohn M.WalkerRobinKentridgeRobert W., et al., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science PublishersBV, 3–22.
38.
RaynerKeith (1998), “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research,” Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 372–422.
RutzOliver J.BucklinRandolph E. (2012), “Does Banner Advertising Affect Browsing for Brands? Clickstream Choice Model Says Yes, for Some,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10 (2), 231–57.
41.
SahniNavdeep S.NairHarikesh S. (2018), “Sponsorship Disclosure and Consumer Deception: Experimental Evidence from Native Advertising in Mobile Search,” Marketing Science, forthcoming, DOI:10.1287/mksc.2018.1125.
42.
SatomuraTakuyaWedelMichelPietersRik (2014), “Copy Alert: A Method and Metric to Detect Visual Copycat Brands,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (1), 1–13.
43.
SchroederWill (1998), “Testing Web Sites with Eye-Tracking,” User Interface Engineering—Eye for Design, 5 (5), 3–4.
ShresthaSavLenzKelsi (2007), “Eye Gaze Patterns While Searching vs. Browsing a Website,” Usability News, 9 (1).
46.
SnodgrassJoan G.McCulloughBrian (1986), “The Role of Visual Similarity in Picture Categorization,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12 (1), 147.
47.
SteinmanRobert M.LevinsonJohn Z. (1990), “The Role of Eye Movement in the Detection of Contrast and Spatial Detail,” Eye Movements and Their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes, 4, 115–212.
48.
TutajKarolinavan ReijmersdalEva A. (2012), “Effects of Online Advertising Format and Persuasion Knowledge on Audience Reactions,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 18 (1), 5–18.
49.
Van der LansRalfPietersRikWedelMichel (2008), “Eye-Movement Analysis of Search Effectiveness,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103 (482), 452–61.
50.
WangPengyuanXiongGuiyangYangJian (2019), “Serial Position Effects on Native Advertising Effectiveness: Differential Results Across Publisher and Advertiser Metrics,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (2), 82–97.
51.
WedelMichelPietersRik (2008), “A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing,” in Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 4, MalhotraNaresh, ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 123–47.
52.
WojdynskiBartosz W. (2016), “Native Advertising: Engagement, Deception, and Implications for Theory,” in The New Advertising: Branding, Content, and Consumer Relationships in a Data-Driven Social Media Era, BrownR.JonesV. K.WangB. M., eds. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC Clio, 203–36.
53.
WojdynskiBartosz W.BangHyejinKeibKateJeffersonBrittany N.ChoiDongwonMalsonJennifer L. (2017), “Building a Better Native Adverting Disclosure,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17 (2), 150–61.
54.
WojdynskiBartosz W.EvansNathaniel J. (2016), “Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (2), 157–68.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
