Mass customization interfaces typically guide consumers through the configuration process in a sequential manner, focusing on one product attribute after the other. What if this standardized customization experience were personalized for consumers on the basis of how they process information? A series of large-scale field and experimental studies, conducted with Western and Eastern consumers, shows that matching the interface to consumers’ culture-specific processing style enhances the effectiveness of mass customization. Specifically, presenting the same information isolated (by attribute) to Western consumers but contextualized (by alternative) to Eastern consumers increases satisfaction with and likelihood of purchasing the configured product, along with the amount of money spent on the product. These positive consumer responses emerge because of an increase in “interface fluency”—consumers’ subjective experience of ease when using the interface. The authors advise firms to personalize the customization experience by employing processing-congruent interfaces across consumer markets.
AlterAdam L.OppenheimerDaniel M. (2008), “Easy on the Mind, Easy on the Wallet: The Roles of Familiarity and Processing Fluency in Valuation Judgments,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (5), 985–90.
2.
AroraNeerajDrèzeXavierGhoseAnindyaHessJames D.IyengarRaghuramJingBing (2008), “Putting One-to-One Marketing to Work: Personalization, Customization, and Choice,” Marketing Letters, 19 (3/4), 305–21.
3.
AtasoyOzgunMorewedgeCarey K. (2018), “Digital Goods Are Valued Less Than Physical Goods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1343–57.
4.
BatraRajeevCharles ZhangY.AydinoğluNilüfer Z.FeinbergFred M. (2017), “Positioning Multicountry Brands: The Impact of Variation in Cultural Values and Competitive Set,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (6), 914–31.
5.
BenjaminAaron S.BjorkRobert A.SchwartzBennett L. (1998), “The Mismeasure of Memory: When Retrieval Fluency Is Misleading as a Metamnemonic Index,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127 (1), 55–68.
6.
BotschenGüntherThelenEva M.PietersRik (1999), “Using Means-End Structures for Benefit Segmentation: An Application to Services,” European Journal of Marketing, 33 (1/2), 38–58.
7.
BroniarczykSusan M.GriffinJill G. (2014), “Decision Difficulty in the Age of Consumer Empowerment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 608–25.
8.
CesarioJosephGrantHeidiTory HigginsE. (2004), “Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer from ‘Feeling Right,’” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (3), 388–404.
9.
ChangChingching (2004), “The Interplay of Product Class Knowledge and Trial Experience in Attitude Formation,” Journal of Advertising, 33 (1), 83–92.
10.
ChoiIncheolKooMinkyungChoiJong An (2007), “Individual Differences in Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (5), 691–705.
11.
ChuP.C.SpiresEric E.SueyoshiToshiyuki (1999), “Cross-Cultural Differences in Choice Behavior and Use of Decision Aids: A Comparison of Japan and the United States,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77 (2), 147–70.
12.
ColzatoLorenza S.van BeestIljavan den WildenbergWery P.MScorolliClaudiaDorchinShirleyMeiranNachshon, et al. (2010), “God: Do I Have Your Attention?” Cognition, 117 (1), 87–94.
13.
De BellisEmanuelHildebrandChristianItoKenichiHerrmannAndreas (2015), “Cross-National Differences in Uncertainty Avoidance Predict the Effectiveness of Mass Customization Across East Asia: A Large-Scale Field Investigation,” Marketing Letters, 26 (3), 309–20.
14.
De BellisEmanuelSprottDavid E.HerrmannAndreasBierhoffHans-WernerRohmannElke (2016), “The Influence of Trait and State Narcissism on the Uniqueness of Mass-Customized Products,” Journal of Retailing, 92 (2), 162–72.
15.
DeBonoKenneth G.HarnishRichard J. (1988), “Source Expertise, Source Attractiveness, and the Processing of Persuasive Information: A Functional Approach,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 (4), 541–46.
16.
DechêneAliceStahlChristophHansenJochimWänkeMichaela (2010), “The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (2), 238–57.
17.
DellaertBenedict G.C.BorgersAloys W.J.LouviereJordan J.TimmermansHarry J.P. (2001), “Using Conjoint Choice Experiments to Model Consumer Choices of Product Component Packages,” in Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, GustafssonAndersHerrmannAndreasHuberFrank, eds. Berlin: Springer, 387–414.
18.
DellaertBenedict G.C.StremerschStefan (2005), “Marketing Mass-Customized Products: Striking a Balance Between Utility and Complexity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (2), 219–27.
FogliattoFlavio S.da SilveiraGiovani J.C.BorensteinDenis (2012), “The Mass Customization Decade: An Updated Review of the Literature,” International Journal of Production Economics, 138 (1), 14–25.
23.
GohJoshua O.CheeMichael W.TanJiat ChowVenkatramanVinodHebrankAndrewLeshikarEric D., et al. (2007), “Age and Culture Modulate Object Processing and Object-Science Binding in the Ventral Visual Area,” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7 (1), 44–52.
24.
GrafLaura K.M.LandwehrJan R. (2015), “A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics: The Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19 (4), 395–410.
25.
Graf, LauraK.MMayerStefanLandwehrJan R. (2018), “Measuring Processing Fluency: One Versus Five Items,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (3), 393–411.
HeringtonCarmelWeavenScott (2009), “E-Retailing by Banks: E-Service Quality and Its Importance to Customer Satisfaction,” European Journal of Marketing, 43 (9/10), 1220–31.
28.
HerrmannAndreasZidansekManjaSprottDavid E.SpangenbergEric R. (2013), “The Power of Simplicity: Processing Fluency and the Effects of Olfactory Cues on Retail Sales,” Journal of Retailing, 89 (1), 30–43.
29.
HildebrandChristianHäublGeraldHerrmannAndreas (2014), “Product Customization via Starting Solutions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (6), 707–25.
30.
HoffmanDonna L.NovakThomas P. (2009), “Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (1), 23–34.
31.
HongJiewenSternthalBrian (2010), “The Effects of Consumer Prior Knowledge and Processing Strategies on Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (2), 301–11.
32.
HuffmanCynthiaKahnBarbara E. (1998), “Variety for Sale: Mass Customization or Mass Confusion?” Journal of Retailing, 74 (4), 491–513.
33.
InmanJ. JeffreyParkJoonwookSinhaAshish (2008), “A Dynamic Choice Map Approach to Modeling Attribute-Level Varied Behavior Among Stockkeeping Units,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (1), 94–103.
34.
JiLi-JunZhangZhiyongNisbettRichard E. (2004), “Is It Culture or Is It Language? Examination of Language Effects in Cross-Cultural Research on Categorization,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (1), 57–65.
35.
KaiserUlrikeSchreierMartinJaniszewskiChris (2017), “The Self-Expressive Customization of a Product Can Improve Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (5), 816–31.
36.
KimHakkyunRaoAkshay R.LeeAngela Y. (2009), “It’s Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (6), 877–89.
37.
KimchiRuthPalmerStephen E. (1982), “Form and Texture in Hierarchically Constructed Patterns,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8 (4), 521–35.
38.
KramerThomasSpolter-WeisfeldSuriThakkarManeesh (2007), “The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Consumer Responses to Personalization,” Marketing Science, 26 (2), 246–58.
39.
KuoAndrewRiceDan Hamilton (2015), “The Impact of Perceptual Congruence on the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 78–88.
40.
LabrooAparna A.DharRaviSchwarzNorbert (2008), “Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (6), 819–31.
41.
LabrooAparna A.PocheptsovaAnastasiya (2016), “Metacognition and Consumer Judgment: Fluency Is Pleasant but Disfluency Ignites Interest,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 154–59.
42.
LalwaniAshok K.ShavittSharon (2013), “You Get What You Pay For? Self-Construal Influences Price-Quality Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 255–67.
43.
LavineHowardSnyderMark (1996), “Cognitive Processing and the Functional Matching Effect in Persuasion: The Mediating Role of Subjective Perceptions of Message Quality,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32 (6), 580–604.
44.
LeeAngela Y.AakerJennifer L. (2004), “Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 205–18.
45.
LiCong (2016), “When Does Web-Based Personalization Really Work? The Distinction Between Actual Personalization and Perceived Personalization,” Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 25–33.
46.
LiangBeichenRunyanRodney C.WeiFu (2011), “The Effect of Culture on the Context of Ad Pictures and Ad Persuasion: The Role of Context-Dependent and Context-Independent Thinking,” International Marketing Review, 28 (4), 412–34.
47.
MasudaTakahikoNisbettRichard E. (2001), “Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5), 922–34.
48.
MongaAlokparna BasuJohnDeborah Roedder (2007), “Cultural Differences in Brand Extension Evaluation: The Influence of Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 529–36.
49.
MongaAlokparnaWilliamsJerome D. (2016), “Cross-Cultural Styles of Thinking and Their Influence on Consumer Behavior,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 65–69.
50.
MoreauC. PageHerdKelly B. (2010), “To Each His Own? How Comparisons with Others Influence Consumers’ Evaluations of Their Self-Designed Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 806–19.
51.
MorlingBethMasudaTakahiko (2012), “Social Cognition in Real Worlds: Cultural Psychology and Social Cognition,” in Sage Handbook of Social Cognition, FiskeSusan T.Neil MacraeC., eds. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 429–50.
52.
MoureyJames A.LamBen C.P.OysermanDaphna (2015), “Consequences of Cultural Fluency,” Social Cognition, 33 (4), 308–44.
53.
NavonDavid (1977), “Forest Before Trees: The Precedence of Global Features in Visual Perception,” Cognitive Psychology, 9 (3), 353–83.
54.
NgSharonLeeAngela Y. (2015), Handbook of Culture and Consumer Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
NisbettRichard E.MasudaTakahiko (2003), “Culture and Point of View,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100 (19), 11163–70.
56.
NisbettRichard E.PengKaipingChoiIncheolNorenzayanAra (2001), “Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition,” Psychological Review, 108 (2), 291–310.
57.
NorenzayanAraSmithEdward E.KimBeom JunNisbettRichard E. (2002), “Cultural Preferences for Formal Versus Intuitive Reasoning,” Cognitive Science, 26 (5), 653–84.
58.
OppenheimerDaniel M. (2008), “The Secret Life of Fluency,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (6), 237–41.
59.
ReineckeKatharinaBernsteinAbraham (2013), “Knowing What a User Likes: A Design Science Approach to Interfaces That Automatically Adapt to Culture,” MIS Quarterly, 37 (2), 427–53.
60.
RosseelYves (2012), “lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling,”Journal of Statistical Software, 48 (2), 1–36.
61.
RutzOliver J.SonnierGarrett P.TrusovMichael (2017), “A New Method to Aid Copy Testing of Paid Search Text Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (6), 885–900.
62.
SalonenVilleKarjaluotoHeikki (2016), “Web Personalization: The State of the Art and Future Avenues for Research and Practice,” Telematics and Informatics, 33 (4), 1088–104.
63.
SchlagerTobiasHildebrandChristianHäublGeraldFrankeNikolausHerrmannAndreas (2018), “Social Product-Customization Systems: Peer Input, Conformity, and Consumers’ Evaluation of Customized Products,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 35 (1), 319–49.
64.
SchwarzNorbert (2004), “Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (4), 332–48.
65.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M.BaumgartnerHans (1998), “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1), 78–90.
66.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M.GeyskensInge (2006), “How Country Characteristics Affect the Perceived Value of Web Sites,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 136–50.
67.
ThompsonDebora V.HamiltonRebecca W. (2006), “The Effects of Information Processing Mode on Consumers’ Responses to Comparative Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (4), 530–40.
68.
TsengMitchell M.PillerFrank T. (2011), The Customer Centric Enterprise: Advances in Mass Customization and Personalization. Berlin: Springer.
69.
ValenzuelaAnaDharRaviZettelmeyerFlorian (2009), “Contingent Response to Self-Customization Procedures: Implications for Decision Satisfaction and Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (6), 754–63.
70.
Van RompayThomas J.L.de VriesPeter W.van VenrooijXaviera G. (2010), “More Than Words: On the Importance of Picture-Text Congruence in the Online Environment,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24 (1), 22–30.
71.
VarnumMichael E.W.GrossmannIgorKitayamaShinobuNisbettRichard E. (2010), “The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition: The Social Orientation Hypothesis,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19 (1), 9–13.
72.
WangHuaitangMasudaTakahikoItoKenichiRashidMarghalara (2012), “How Much Information? East Asian and North American Cultural Products and Information Search Performance,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 (12), 1539–51.
73.
WheelerChristian S.PettyRichard E.BizerGeorge Y. (2005), “Self-Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 787–97.
74.
WhiteKatherinePelozaJohn (2009), “Self-Benefit Versus Other-Benefit Marketing Appeals: Their Effectiveness in Generating Charitable Support,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (4), 109–24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
