Structure Altering Effects of a Multicomponent Reading Intervention: An Application of the Direct and Inferential Mediation (DIME) Model of Reading Comprehension in Upper Elementary Grades

Abstract

We evaluate the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model for reading comprehension with a sample of struggling readers in Grades 3 to 5 (N = 364) in the context of a large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating two theoretically distinct reading interventions (text processing + foundational skills [n = 117] or text processing only [n = 120]) and a control condition (n = 127). We investigate whether the intervention affects not just reading comprehension levels, but also how variables within the reading system interrelate. This approach allows the focus to shift from intervention as influencing a change in reading comprehension status to a complex set of processes. We fit structural equation models (SEMs) to evaluate the DIME model at baseline and a change model that included reading comprehension and word reading at posttest. There were no significant mean differences between groups in reading comprehension. However, significant differences emerged on the direct and indirect effects of background knowledge, vocabulary, word reading, strategies, and inferencing on comprehension across grade levels and treatment conditions. Related to treatment groups, background knowledge, vocabulary, and inferencing were significantly related to comprehension at posttest for students who received text processing and/or foundational skills interventions. The results have implications for the direct instruction of higher-order reading skills in the context of multicomponent interventions.

Keywords

reading comprehension vocabulary background knowledge inferencing reading strategies reading intervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adlof

S. M.

Catts

H. W.

Little

T. D.

(2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19, 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z

Ahmed

Francis

D. J.

York

Fletcher

J. M.

Barnes

Kulesz

(2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002

Barnes

M. A.

Dennis

Haefele-Kalvaitis

(1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61(3), 216–241. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0015

Barth

A. E.

Vaughn

Capin

Cho

Stillman-Spisak

Martinez

Kincaid

(2016). Effects of a text-processing comprehension intervention on struggling middle school readers. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(4), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000101

Blase

Fixsen

(2013). Core intervention components: Identifying and operationalizing what makes programs work [ASPE Research Brief]. U.S, Department of Health and Human Services.

Bollen

K. A.

Pearl

(2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Springer.

Bollen

K. A.

Stine

(1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/271084

Cain

Oakhill

(2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610

Cain

Oakhill

(2014). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more important for some aspects of comprehension? L’Année Psychologique, 114(4), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004035

10.

Cain

Oakhill

J. V.

Barnes

M. A.

Bryant

P. E.

(2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31

11.

Catts

H. W.

(2018). The simple view of reading: Advancements and false impressions. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518767563

12.

Catts

H. W.

Adlof

S. M.

Weismer

S. E.

(2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)

13.

Chall

J. S.

(1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.

14.

Chall

J. S.

Jacobs

V. A.

(1983). Writing and reading in the elementary grades: Developmental trends among low SES children. Language Arts, 60(5), 617–626. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41961511

15.

Cirino

P. T.

(2012). The contextual learning scale. Author.

16.

Cirino

P. T.

Ahmed

Miciak

Taylor

W. P.

Gerst

E. H.

Barnes

M. A.

(2018). A framework for executive function in the late elementary years. Neuropsychology, 32(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9923-9

17.

Cirino

P. T.

Romain

M. A.

Barth

A. E.

Tolar

T. D.

Fletcher

J. M.

Vaughn

(2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1059–1086. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9406-3

18.

Compton

D. L.

Miller

A. C.

Elleman

A. M.

Steacy

L. M.

(2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.836200

19.

Cromley

J. G.

Azevedo

(2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311

20.

Cromley

J. G.

Snyder-Hogan

L. E.

Luciw-Dubas

U. A.

(2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019452

21.

Curran

P. J.

Muthén

B. O.

(1999). The application of latent curve analysis to testing developmental theories in intervention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022137429115

22.

Daugaard

H. T.

Cain

Elbro

(2017). From words to text: Inference making mediates the role of vocabulary in children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1773–1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9752-2

23.

Evans

J. J.

Floyd

R. G.

McGrew

K. S.

Leforgee

M. H.

(2002). The relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading achievement during childhood and adolescence. School Psychology Review, 31(2), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10083

24.

Fixen

Blasé

Naoon

Duda

(2013). Implementation drivers: Assessing best practices. National Implementation Science Network.

25.

Fletcher

J. M.

Lyon

G. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Barnes

M. A.

(2018). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. Guilford.

26.

Foorman

B. R.

Francis

D. J.

Fletcher

J. M.

Schatschneider

Mehta

(1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37

27.

Foorman

B. R.

Koon

Petscher

Mitchell

Truckenmiller

(2015). Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 884–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000026

28.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

29.

Francis

D. J.

Kulesz

P. A.

Benoit

J. S.

(2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading (CVR i). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518772904

30.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2019). On the importance of moderator analysis in intervention research: An introduction to the special issue. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918811924

31.

Fuchs

Hendricks

Walsh

M. E.

Fuchs

L. S.

Gilbert

J. K.

Zhang Tracy

. . . Peng

(2018). Evaluating a multidimensional reading comprehension program and reconsidering the lowly reputation of tests of near-transfer. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12162

32.

Gough

P. B.

Tunmer

W. E.

(1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

33.

Hall

Barnes

M. A.

(2017). Inference instruction to support reading comprehension for elementary students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216676799

34.

Hammill

D. D.

Larsen

S. C.

(2009). Test of written language 4 (TOWL-4). Pro-Ed Assessments.

35.

Hedges

L. V.

(2018). Challenges in building usable knowledge in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1375583

36.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

37.

Kaufman

A. S.

Kaufman

N. L.

(2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test (2nd ed.). Pearson.

38.

Kendeou

Papadopoulos

T. C.

Spanoudis

(2012). Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.001

39.

Kim

Y. S. G.

(2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643

40.

Kim

Y. S. G.

(2020a). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000407

41.

Kim

Y. S. G.

(2020b). Toward integrative reading science: The direct and indirect effects model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420908239

42.

Kopatich

R. D.

Magliano

J. P.

Millis

K. K.

Parker

C. P.

Ray

(2019). Understanding how language-specific and domain-general resources support comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 530–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1519358

43.

Language and Reading Research Consortium, & Logan

. (2017). Pressure points in reading comprehension: A quantile multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000150

44.

Little

R. J.

(1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722

45.

Lovett

M. W.

Frijters

J. C.

Wolf

Steinbach

K. A.

Sevcik

R. A.

Morris

R. D.

(2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181

46.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Lockwood

C. M.

Hoffman

J. M.

West

S. G.

Sheets

(2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83

47.

MacGinitie

W. H.

MacGinitie

R. K.

Maria

Dryer

(2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Riverside.

48.

Magliano

J. P.

Higgs

Santuzzi

Tonks

S. M.

O’Reilly

Sabatini

Feller

Kopatich

Ray

Parker

(2020). Testing the inference mediation hypothesis in a post-secondary context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101867

49.

McNamara

D. S.

Floyd

R. G.

Best

Louwerse

(2003). World knowledge driving young readers’ comprehension difficulties. In Kafai

Y. B.

Sandoval

W. A.

Enyedy

Nixon

A. S.

Herrera

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 326–333). Lawrence Erlbaum.

50.

McNamara

D. S.

Magliano

(2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2

51.

Miciak

Roberts

Taylor

W. P.

Solis

Ahmed

Vaughn

Fletcher

J. M.

(2018). The effects of one versus two years of intensive reading intervention implemented with late elementary struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(1), 24–36. http://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12159

52.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

(2018). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).

53.

Oakhill

Cain

(2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. In McNamara

D. S.

(Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47–71). Lawrence Erlbaum.

54.

Oakhill

Cain

(2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Cain

Compton

Parrila

R. K.

(Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 359–375). John Benjamins.

55.

Oslund

E. L.

Clemens

N. H.

Simmons

D. C.

Simmons

L. E.

(2018). The direct and indirect effects of word reading and vocabulary on adolescents’ reading comprehension: Comparing struggling and adequate comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9788-3

56.

Oslund

E. L.

Clemens

N. H.

Simmons

D. C.

Smith

S. L.

Simmons

L. E.

(2016). How vocabulary knowledge of middle-school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds influences comprehension processes and outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.013

57.

Peng

Goodrich

J. M.

(2020). The cognitive element model of reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S77–S88. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.336

58.

Pike

M. M.

Barnes

M. A.

Barron

R. W.

(2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006

59.

Preacher

K. J.

Rucker

D. D.

Hayes

A. F.

(2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. http://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316

60.

Rapp

D. N.

Broek

P. V. D.

McMaster

K. L.

Kendeou

Espin

C. A.

(2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530417

61.

Roberts

Fletcher

J. M.

Stuebing

K. K.

Barth

A. E.

Vaughn

(2013). Treatment effects for adolescent struggling readers: An application of moderated mediation. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.008

62.

Roberts

G. J.

Capin

Roberts

Miciak

Quinn

J. M.

Vaughn

(2018). Examining the effects of afterschool reading interventions for upper elementary struggling readers. Remedial and Special Education, 39(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517750818

63.

Ryu

Cheong

(2017). Comparing indirect effects in different groups in single-group and multi-group structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 747. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00747

64.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y

65.

Scammacca

N. K.

Roberts

G. J.

Cho

Williams

K. J.

Roberts

Vaughn

S. R.

Carroll

(2016). A century of progress: Reading interventions for students in grades 4–12, 1914–2014. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 756–800. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316652942

66.

Scammacca

N. K.

Roberts

Vaughn

Stuebing

K. K.

(2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504995

67.

Scarborough

H. S.

Neuman

Dickinson

(2009). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Fletcher-Campbell

Soler

Reid

(Eds.), Approaching difficulties in literacy development: Assessment, pedagogy and programmes (pp. 23–38). SAGE.

68.

Segers

Verhoeven

(2016). How logical reasoning mediates the relation between lexical quality and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 29(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9613-9

69.

Slavin

R. E.

Karweit

N. L.

Madden

N. A.

(1989). Effective programs for students at risk. Allyn & Bacon.

70.

Smith

S. R.

(2013). Testing a multicomponent model of reading comprehension for seventh- and eighth-grade students (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University Libraries.

71.

Szadokierski

Burns

M. K.

McComas

J. J.

(2017). Predicting intervention effectiveness from reading accuracy and rate measures through the instructional hierarchy: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 46(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0013.V46-2

72.

Tarchi

(2010). Reading comprehension of informative texts in secondary school: A focus on direct and indirect effects of reader’s prior knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.002

73.

Torgesen

J. K.

Wagner

R. K.

Rashotte

C. A.

(1999). TOWRE: Test of word reading efficiency. Pro-Ed.

74.

Van Norman

E. R.

Maki

K. E.

Burns

M. K.

McComas

J. J.

Helman

. (2018). Comparison of progress monitoring data from general outcome measures and specific subskill mastery measures for reading. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.002

75.

Vaughn

Roberts

G. J.

Miciak

Taylor

Fletcher

J. M.

(2019). Efficacy of a word-and text-based intervention for students with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775113

76.

Vaughn

Solís

Miciak

Taylor

W. P.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2016). Effects from a randomized control trial comparing researcher and school-implemented treatments with fourth graders with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1126386

77.

Vaughn

Swanson

E. A.

Roberts

Wanzek

Stillman-Spisak

S. J.

Solis

Simmons

(2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.039

78.

Vitale

M. R.

Romance

N. R.

(2007). A knowledge-based framework for unifying content-area reading comprehension and reading comprehension strategies. In McNamara

D. S.

(Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 73–104). Lawrence Erlbaum.

79.

Völlinger

V. A.

Spörer

Lubbe

Brunstein

J. C.

(2018). A path analytic test of the reading strategies mediation model: Relating cognitive competences and motivational influences to individual differences in fifth-grade students’ reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(6), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1412930

80.

Wagner

R. K.

Muse

A. E.

Tannenbaum

K. R.

(2007). Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension. Guilford Press.

81.

Wagner

R. K.

Torgesen

J. K.

Rashotte

C. A.

(2010). Test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension (TOSREC). Pro-Ed.

82.

Wijekumar

K. K.

Meyer

B. J.

Lei

(2012). Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 987–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9263-4

83.

Woodcock

R. W.

McGrew

Mather

(2007). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement (3rd ed.). Riverside.

84.

Zargar

Adams

A. M.

Connor

C. M.

(2020). The relations between children’s comprehension monitoring and their reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 511–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09966-3

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB