Low-achieving readers in Grade 5 often lack comprehension strategies, domain knowledge, word recognition skills, fluency, and motivation to read. Students with such multiple reading needs seem likely to benefit from instruction that supports each of these reading processes. The authors tested this expectation experimentally by comparing the effects of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI) with traditional instruction (TI) on several outcomes in a 12-week intervention for low achievers and high achievers. Low achievers in the CORI group were afforded explicit instruction, leveled texts, and motivation support. Compared with TI students, CORI students scored higher on posttest measures of word recognition speed, reading comprehension on the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test, and ecological knowledge. CORI was equally effective for lower achievers and higher achievers. Explicitly supporting multiple aspects of reading simultaneously appeared to benefit diverse learners on a range of reading outcomes.
Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schematheoretic view of basic processes in reading . In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
2.
Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452-477.
3.
Barbosa, P., & Alexander, L. (2004). Science inquiry in the CORI framework. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 113-141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Bogner, K., Raphael, L., & Pressley, M. (2002). How Grade 1 teachers motivate literate activity in their students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 135-165.
5.
Chapman, J.W., & Tunmer, W.E. (1995). Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154-167.
6.
Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
7.
Dreher, M.J. (2003). Motivating struggling readers by tapping the potential of information books. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 25-38.
8.
Foorman, B.R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M.N., Fletcher, J.M., Moats, L.C., & Francis, D.J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in Grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1-29.
9.
Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Catts, H., & Tomblin, J. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S. Paris & S. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369-394). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, J.P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
11.
Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 1-30.
12.
Guthrie, J.T., & Humenick, N.M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
13.
Guthrie, J.T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. (2007). Contributions of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivation in reading. Educational Psychologist, 43, 237-250.
14.
Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Reading research handbook, Vol. III (pp. 403-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Roles of motivation and engagement in reading comprehension assessment. In S. Paris & S. Stahl (Eds.), Children's Reading Comprehension and Assessment (pp. 187-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., Davis, M.H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403-423.
17.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (Eds.). (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103-128.
19.
Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458-492.
20.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
21.
Klauda, S.L., & Guthrie, J.T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology , 100, 310-321.
22.
Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
23.
Ladsen-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
24.
Lutz, S.L., Guthrie, J.T., & Davis, M.H. (2006). Scaffolding for engagement in elementary school reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 3-20.
Manset-Williamson, G., & Nelson, J.M. (2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 59-74.
27.
Mason, L.H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal question among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283-296.
28.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Graetz, J.E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103-116.
29.
Meece, J.L., & Miller, S.D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students' achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 454-480.
30.
Moats, L.C. (2004). Efficacy of a structured, systematic language curriculum for adolescent poor readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20, 145-159.
31.
Morgan, P., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73, 165-183.
32.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
33.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Pinnell, G.S., Pikulski, J.J., Wixson, K.K., Campbell, J.R., Gough, P.B., & Beatty, A.S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP's Integrated Reading Performance Record (IRPR) at Grade 4 (NCES 95-726). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics .
35.
Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N.K., & Martineau, J.A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 8-45.
36.
Romance, N.R., & Vitale, M.R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth, expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications . International Journal of Science Education, 23, 373-404.
37.
Rubie, C.M., Townsend, M.A.R., & Moore, D.W. (2004). Motivational and academic effects of cultural experiences for indigenous minority students in New Zealand. Educational Psychology, 24, 143-160.
38.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1997). Developing self-efficacious readers and writers: The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34-50). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
41.
Smolken, L.B., & Donovan, C.A. (2003). Supporting comprehension acquisition for emerging and struggling readers: The interactive information book read-aloud. Exceptionality, 11, 25-38.
42.
Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension . Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71.
43.
Swanson, H.L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 32, 504-532.
44.
Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Peterson, D.S., & Rodriguez, M.C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104, 3-28.
45.
Therrien, W.J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education , 25, 252-261.
46.
Thorkildsen, T.A. (2002). Literacy as a lifestyle: Negotiating the curriculum to facilitate motivation. Reading & Writing Quarterly , 18, 321-341.
47.
Torgeson, J.K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355-382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
48.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Motivation for reading: Individual, home, textual, and classroom perspective. Educational Psychologist, 32, 57-135.
49.
Williams, J.P. (2003). Teaching test structure to improve reading comprehension . In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 293-305). New York: Guilford.
