This investigation employs categorical content analysis processes as a mechanism to examine trends and issues in a sampling of highly cited (100+) literature in special education journals. The authors had two goals: (a) broadly identifying trends across publication type, content area, and methodology and (b) specifically identifying articles with disaggregated outcomes for students with learning disabilities (LD). Content analyses were conducted across highly cited (100+) articles published during a 20-year period (1992–2013) in a sample (n = 3) of journals focused primarily on LD, and in one broad, cross-categorical journal recognized for its impact in the field. Results indicated trends in the article type (i.e., commentary and position papers), content (i.e., reading and behavior), and methodology (i.e., small proportions of experimental and quasi-experimental designs). Results also revealed stability in the proportion of intervention research studies when compared to previous analyses and a decline in the proportion of those that disaggregated data specifically for students with LD.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.
2.
DenoE. (1970). Special education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children, 37(3), 229–237.
3.
DenoS. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219–232.
4.
DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M.AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 447–466.
5.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
6.
FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37.
7.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.SteckerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301–323.
8.
FuchsD.MockD.MorganP. L.YoungC. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 157–171.
9.
GageN. A.LewisT. J.AdamsonR. M. (2010). An examination of 35 years of “Behavioral Disorders”: What, how, and who has been published. Behavioral Disorders, 35(4), 280–293.
10.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164.
11.
HeathN. L.TosteJ. R.RobertsE. (2007). Learning disabilities research: Ten years in review. Thalamus, 25(1), 9–17.
12.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
13.
KirkS. A.BatemanB. (1962). Diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 29(2), 73–78.
14.
Lull PoolJ.MacyM.Bells McManusS.NohJ. (2008). An exploratory investigation of frequently cited articles from the early childhood intervention literature, 1994 to 2005. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28(3), 181–189.
15.
MastropieriM. A.BerkeleyS.McDuffieK. A.GraffH.MarshakL.ConnersN. A.… Cuenca-SanchezY. (2009). What is published in the field for special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 95–109.
16.
McFarlandL.WilliamsJ.MiciakJ. (2013). Ten years of research: A systematic review of three refereed LD journals. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(2), 60–69.
17.
McLeskeyJ. (2004). Classic articles in special education: Articles that shaped the field, 1960 to 1996. Remedial and Special Education, 25(2), 79–87.
18.
McLeskeyJ.LandersE. (2006). Classic articles in special education: An exploratory investigation. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 68–76.
19.
O’ConnorR. E.HartyK. R.FulmerD. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 532–538.
20.
PattonJ. R.PollowayE. A.EpsteinM. H. (1989). Are there seminal works in special education?Remedial and Special Education, 10(3), 54–59.
21.
ReynoldsM. C.WangM. C.WalbergH. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53(5), 391–398.
22.
SabornieE. J. (1994). Social-affective characteristics in early adolescents identified as learning-disabled and nondisabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(4), 268–279.
23.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33.
24.
SmartJ. C.EltonC. F. (1981). Structural characteristics and citation rates of education journals. American Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 399–413.
25.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
26.
SwansonH. L.PlankD.StillJ. (1988). The characteristics of prominent articles with “special education” in the title. Remedial and Special Education, 9(5), 41–49.
27.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SmallS.FanueleD. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 157–169.
28.
VostalB. R.HughesC. A.RuhlK. L.Benedek-WoodE.DexterD. D. (2008). A content analysis of learning disabilities research & practice: 1991–2007. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(4), 184–193.
29.
WillM. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52(5), 411–415.
