Does Applied STEM Course Taking Link to STEM Outcomes for High School Students With Learning Disabilities?

Abstract

Over the most recent two decades, federal policy has urged high schools to embed applied science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses into the curriculum to reinforce concepts learned in traditional math and science classes as well as to motivate students’ interests and long-term pursuits in STEM areas. While prior research has examined whether these courses link to STEM persistence for the general student population, no work has examined the role of these courses for students with learning disabilities (LDs). This is a critical lapse, as these courses have been supported as being one path by which STEM material can become more accessible for students with diverse learning needs. Hence, this descriptive study examines the landscape of applied STEM course taking for students with LDs. The findings suggest students with LDs are less likely to take applied STEM courses in high school compared to the general population. Additionally, while the general population does benefit from taking these courses, there is a unique association between applied STEM course taking and advanced math and science course taking or math achievement for students with LDs. Hence, there is no evidence that applied STEM course taking is related to any closure of the STEM achievement gap for students with LDs.

Keywords

high school age secondary data analysis coursework

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman

(1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Adelman

(2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Arceneaux

Nickerson

D. W.

(2009). Modeling certainty with clustered data: A comparison of methods. Political Analysis, 17(2), 177–190.

Artiles

A. J.

Kozleski

E. B.

Trent

S. C.

Osher

Ortiz

(2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 279–299.

Basham

J. D.

Marino

M. T.

(2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8–15.

Blackorby

Wagner

(1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–414.

Blickenstaff

J. C.

(2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter. Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.

Bradby

Hudson

(2007). The 2007 revision of the career/technical education portion of the secondary school taxonomy (No. 2008–30). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Brigham

F. J.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2011). Science education and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 223–232.

10.

Brody

L. E.

Benbow

C. P.

(1990). Effects of high school course-work and time on SAT scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 866–875.

11.

Burkam

D. T.

Lee

V. E.

(2003). Mathematics, foreign language, and science coursetaking and the NELS:88 transcript data (Working Paper, NCES 2003–01). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

12.

Cameron

A. C.

Trivedi

P. K.

(2010). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

13.

Carl

. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006, S. 250, 109th Congress (2006). Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-109s250enr/pdf/BILLS-109s250enr.pdf

14.

Carnevale

A. P.

Smith

Melton

(2011). STEM: Science technology, engineering, mathematics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce.

15.

Cawley

Hayden

Cade

Baker-Kroczynski

(2002). Including students with disability into the general science classroom. Exceptional Children, 68, 423–435.

16.

Csikszentmihalyi

Schneider

(2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York, NY: Basic Books.

17.

Dexter

D. D.

Park

Y. J.

Hughes

C. A.

(2011). A meta-analytic review of graphic organizers and science instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities: Implications for the intermediate and secondary science classroom. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 204–213.

18.

Faulkner

V. N.

Crossland

C. L.

Stiff

L. V.

(2013). Predicting eighth-grade algebra students with individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 329–345.

19.

Federman

(2007). State graduation requirements, high school course taking, and choosing a technical college major. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7, 1–34.

20.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2015). The influence of applied STEM coursetaking on advanced math and science coursetaking. Journal of Educational Research, 108, 382–399.

21.

Gottfried

M. A.

Bozick

Srinivasan

S. V.

(2014). Beyond academic math: The role of applied STEM coursetaking in high school. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1–35.

22.

Ingels

S. J.

Pratt

D. J.

Rogers

J. E.

Siegel

P. H.

Stutts

E. S.

(2005). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base-year to first follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2006-344). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

23.

Langdon

McKittrick

Beede

Khan

Doms

(2011, July). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. Retrieved from http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/stemfinalyjuly14_1.pdf

24.

Lee

V. E.

Frank

K. A.

(1990). Students’ characteristics that facilitate the transfer from two-year to four-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 63, 178–193.

25.

Long

M. C.

Conger

Iatarola

(2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and post-secondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 285–322.

26.

McClure

G. T.

(1998). High school mathematics course taking and achievement among college-bound students: 1987–1996. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 110–118.

27.

Mehan

Hertweck

Meihls

J. L.

(1986). Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students’ educational careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

28.

Moon

N. W.

Todd

R. L.

Morton

D. L.

Ivey

(2012). Accommodating students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM): Findings from research and practice for middle grades through university education. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access.

29.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

Hillemeir

M. M.

Maczuga

(2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45, 18–35.

30.

National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

31.

National Science Foundation. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.

32.

Palincsar

A. S.

Magnusson

S. J.

Collins

K. M.

Cutter

(2001). Making science accessible to all: Results of a design experiment in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 15–32.

33.

Parmar

R. S.

Deluca

D. B.

Janczak

T. M.

(1994). Investigations into the relationship between science and language abilities of students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 117–126.

34.

Pearson

Chrissy

S. R.

Riegle-Crumb

(2009). Gendered fields: Sports and advanced course taking in high school. Sex Roles, 61, 519–535.

35.

Plank

S. B.

DeLuca

Estacion

(2008). High school dropout and the role of career and technical education: A survival analysis of surviving high school. Sociology of Education, 81(4), 345–370. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100402

36.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010, September). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America’s future. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf

37.

Riegle-Crumb

(2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113, 101–122.

38.

Rothwell

(2014, July). Still searching: Job vacancies and STEM skills. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/interactives/2014/job-vacancies-and-stem-skills#/M10420

39.

Royston

(2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.

40.

Rule

Stefanich

Boody

(2011). The impact of a working conference focused on supporting students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 24(4), 351–367.

41.

Schafer

J. L.

(1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.

42.

Schafer

J. L.

Graham

J. W.

(2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

43.

Schneider

Swanson

C. B.

Reigle-Crumb

(1998). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2(1), 25–53.

44.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Bakken

J. P.

Brigham

F. J.

(1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1–15.

45.

Shifrer

Callahan

R. M.

Muller

(2013). Equity or marginalization? The high school course-taking of students labeled with a learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 656–682.

46.

Spellings

Justesen

T. R.

Knudsen

W. W.

(2007). Report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education.

47.

Steele

(2004). Teaching science to middle school students with learning problems. Preventing School Failure, 49(1), 19–22.

48.

Therrien

W. J.

Taylor

J. C.

Hosp

J. L.

Kaldenberg

E. R.

Gorsh

(2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 188–203.

49.

Trusty

(2002). Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics majors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 464–474.

50.

Tyson

Lee

Borman

K. M.

Hanson

M. A.

(2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 243–270.

51.

U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS:2002): Base year to second follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2008-347). Washington, DC: Author.

52.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Institute of Education Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2009 Science Assessment. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

53.

U.S. Department of Education. (2014). The condition of education. Washington, DC: Author.

54.

Van Buuren

Boshuizen

Knook

. (1999). Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 681–694.

55.

Villanueva

M. G.

Hand

(2011). Science for all: Engaging students with special needs in and about science. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 233–240.

56.

Vilorio

(2014). STEM 101: Intro to tomorrow’s jobs. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2014/spring/art01.pdf

57.

Visser

Danielson

M. L.

Bitsko

R. H.

Holbrook

J. R.

Kogan

M. D.

Ghandour

R. M.

… Blumberg

S. J.

(2014). Trends in the parent-report of health care provider–diagnosed and medicated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: United States, 2003–2011. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(1), 34–46.

58.

Von Hippel

. (2007). Regression with missing y’s: An improved method for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83–117.

59.

Wang

(2013). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54, 664–692.

60.

Williams

R. L.

(2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645–646.

61.

Wimberly

G. L.

Noeth

R. J.

(2005). College readiness begins in middle school. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.

62.

Yamauchi

Leigh

(2011). Which children benefit from non-parental care? Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1468–1490. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.012

63.

Yellen

J. L.

(2014). Speech at the National Summit on Diversity in the Economics Profession, Washington, D.C.: Welcoming remarks. Retrieved from http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/yellen20141030a.htm?