The note- and test-taking skills of typically functioning undergraduates are significantly and positively related to handwriting speed, listening comprehension, background knowledge and sustained attention. This study attempted to replicate these findings with two groups of high school students—those with and without the diagnosis of a learning disability (LD). Students without LD scored significantly higher than those with LD on handwriting speed, listening comprehension, background knowledge, sustained attention, quality of notes, and test performance. Results of regression analyses indicated that note-taking (f2 = 1.94) and test-taking (f2 = 2.69) were associated with listening comprehension and background knowledge predominately. If these results are replicated, they suggest that the variables related to note-taking in typically functioning undergraduates are similar to high school students with and without LD. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
AdamsB. C.BellL. C.PerfettiC. A. (1995). A trading relationship between reading skill and domain knowledge in children’s text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544943
2.
AldridgeR. L.KeithB.SloasS.Mott-MurphreeA. (2010). Relationship of the Nelson Denny Reading Test to scores on the national physical therapy licensure examination. Journal of Allied Health, 39, 72–75.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
BaguleyT. (2012). Serious stats: A guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Palgrave MacMillan.
7.
BarnettA.HendersonS. E.ScheibB.SchulzJ. (2010). The Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting 17+ (DASH 17+). Pearson Assessments.
8.
BateA. J.MathiasJ. L.CrawfordJ. R. (2010). Performance on the Test of Everyday Attention and standard tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 405–402. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.15.3.405.10279
9.
BerningerV. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511269
10.
BerningerV. W.MizokawaD.BraggR. (1991). Theory-based diagnosis of remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(91)90016-K
11.
BerningerV. W.NielsenK. H.AbbottR. D.WijsmanE.RaskindW. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Under-recognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.008
12.
BoyleJ. R. (2010). Note-taking skills of middle school students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371679
13.
BoyleJ. R.RiveraT. Z. (2012). Note-taking techniques for students with disabilities: A systematic review of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711435794
14.
BrinkleyA. (2007). A survey of American history (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
15.
BrownJ. I.FishcoV. V.HannaG. S. (1993). Nelson–Denny Reading Test. Riverside Publishing.
16.
CainK.OakhillJ. V.BarnesM. A.BryantP. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29, 850–859. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414
17.
CarrS. C.ThompsonB. (1996). The effects of prior knowledge on schema activation on the inferential reading comprehension of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511053
ConnellyV.DockrellJ. E. (2015). Writing development and instruction for students with learning disabilities: Using diagnostic categories to study writing difficulties. In MacArthurC.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 349–363). Guilford Press.
20.
ConnellyV.DockrellJ. E.BarnettJ. (2005). The slow handwriting of undergraduate students constrains overall performance in exam essays. Educational Psychology, 25, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000294912
21.
CopelandA. P.WisniewskiN. M. (1981). Learning disability and hyperactivity: Deficits in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(81)90095-3
22.
CortiellaC. (2011). The state of learning disabilities. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
23.
DelgadoJ. P. (2004). Adventures of a sea hunter: In search of famous shipwrecks. Douglas & McIntyre.
24.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2019). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.FinkB. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620
27.
GreggN.ColemanC.DavisM.ChalkJ. C. (2007). Timed essay writing: Implications for high-stakes tests. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400040201
28.
GuthrieJ. T.McRaeA. (2011). Reading engagement among African American and European American students. In SamuelsS. J.FarstrupA. E. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 115–142). International Reading Association.
29.
HaughtP. A.WallsR. T. (2002). Adult learners: New norms on the Nelson-Denny Reading Test for healthcare professionals. Reading Psychology, 23, 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710290061337
30.
HughesC. A.SuritskyS. K. (1994). Note-taking skills of university students with and without disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949402700105
31.
IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp.
32.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
33.
JonesD.ChristensenC. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44
34.
KaufmanA.KaufmanN. (2004). Kaufman test of educational achievement (2nd ed.). AGS Publishing.
35.
KingA. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163370
36.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
37.
KobayashiK. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26, 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342070
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.BlakeR. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218–253. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
40.
MorrisM. A.SchraufnagelC. D.ChudnowR. S.WeinbergW. A. (2009). Learning disabilities do not go away: 20- to 25-year study of cognition, academic achievement, and affective illness. Journal of Child Neurology, 24, 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073808324218
41.
OylerJ. D.ObrzutJ. E.AsbjornsenA. E. (2012). Verbal learning and memory functions in adolescents with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712436815
42.
OyzonM. V. L.OlmosO. L. (2009). Students’ notes and their relations to comprehension and recall of lecture information. Alipato: A Journal of Basic Education, 3, 7–18.
PeverlyS. T.BrobstK. E.GrahamM.ShawR. (2003). College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study of the relationship of self-regulation, note-taking, and test-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.335
45.
PeverlyS. T.GarnerJ. K.VekariaP. C. (2014). Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x
46.
PeverlyS. T.MarcelinG. E.KernM. B. (2014). Tailoring interventions for students with difficulties in lecture note-taking. In MascoloJ. T.FlanaganD. P.AlfonsoV. C. (Eds.), Essentials of planning, selecting, and tailoring interventions for unique learners (pp. 387–414). John Wiley.
47.
PeverlyS. T.RamasamyV.BrownC.SumowskiJ.AlidoostM.GarnerJ. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking?Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.167
48.
PeverlyS. T.VekariaP. C.ReddingtonL. A.SumowskiJ. F.JohnsonK. R.RamsayC. M. (2013). The relationship of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension and outlines to lecture note-taking and test-taking among College students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2881
49.
PeverlyS. T.WolfA. D. (2019). Note-taking. In DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 320–355). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.
50.
PiolatA.OliveT.KelloggR. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086
51.
PruntyM. M.BarnettA. L. (2019). Accuracy and consistency of letter formation in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: An exploratory study. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
52.
PruntyM. M.BarnettA. L.WilmutK.PlumbM. S. (2016). The impact of handwriting difficulties on compositional quality in children with developmental coordination disorder. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616650903
53.
ReddingtonL. A.PeverlyS. T.BlockC. J. (2015). An examination of some of the cognitive and motivation variables related to gender differences in lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 1155–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9566-z
54.
RichardsG. P.SamuelsS. J.TurnureJ. E.YsseldykeJ. (1990). Sustained and selective attention in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300210
55.
RobertsonI. H.WardT.RidgewayV.Nimmo-SmithI. (1994). The test of everyday attention. Thames Valley Test Company.
56.
SchneiderW.KorkelJ.WeinertF. E. (1989). Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance: A comparison of high- and low-aptitude children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.306
57.
ShernoffD. J.CsikszentmihalyiM.SchneiderB.ShernoffE. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
58.
SumnerE.ConnellyV. (2019). Writing and revision strategies of students with and without dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419899090
59.
SumnerE.ConnellyV.BarnettA. L. (2013). Children with dyslexia are slow writers because they pause more often and not because they are slow at handwriting execution. Reading and Writing, 26, 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9403-6
60.
SuritskyS. K. (1992). Notetaking difficulties and approaches reported by university students with learning disabilities. Journal on Postsecondary Education and Disability, 10, 3–10.
61.
SwansonH. L.SiegelL. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education, 7, 1–48.
62.
SwansonH. L.ZhengX.JermanO. (2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 260–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409331958
63.
van MeterP.YokoiL.PressleyM. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.86.3.323
64.
VekariaP. C.PeverlyS. T. (2018). Lecture note-taking in post-secondary students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 1551–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9849
65.
VladescuJ. (2004). Test review: Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Second Edition (KTEA-II). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906294708
66.
Ward-LonerganJ. M.LilesB. Z.AndersonA. M. (1998). Listening comprehension and recall abilities in adolescents with language-learning disabilities and without disabilities for social studies lectures. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9924(97)00048-8
