Lervag and Hulme’s neuro-developmental theory and Wolf and Bowers’s double-deficit hypothesis were examined in this longitudinal study. A total of 130 children were tested in preschool and followed through fifth grade, when 84 remained in the study. During preschool and kindergarten the participants were given tests of end-sound discrimination (phonological awareness; PA) and the rapid naming of objects (rapid automatic naming; RAN) and were placed into the four groupings of the double-deficit hypothesis. The growth curves for the four groups with the subtests of word reading, pseudoword reading, and comprehension supported the double-deficit hypothesis. The RAN objects scores of preschool and kindergarten predicted reading at every age level and offered support for Lervag and Hulme’s neuro-developmental theory. It was concluded that both RAN and PA predicted reading in the English language throughout the elementary school years and that the early assessments of these variables were more diagnostic than measures at later ages.
BeringerV.AbbottR. D.BillingsleyF.NagyW. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination and morphological awareness. In WolfM. (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain (pp. 383–414). Timonium, MD: York Press.
2.
BowersP. G. (1995). Tracing symbol naming speed’s unique contributions to reading disabilities over time. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 189–216.
3.
BowersP. G.IshaikG. (2003). RAN’s contribution to understanding reading disabilities. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 140-157). New York, NY: Guilford.
4.
BowersP. G.SunsethK.GoldenJ. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 31–53.
5.
BowersP. G.SwansonL. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195–219.
6.
BoweyJ. A. (2005). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 155–172). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
BradleyL.BryantP. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
8.
CohenL.LehericyS.ChochonF.LemerC.RivaudS.DehaeneS. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain, 125, 1054–1069.
9.
ComptonD. L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 219–259.
10.
ComptonD. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225–239.
11.
ConradN. J.LevyB. A. (2007). Letter processing and the formation of memory representations in children with naming speed deficits. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 201–223.
de JongP. F.van der LeijA. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77.
14.
DehaeneS. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In DehaeneS.DuhamelJ. R.HauserM.RizzolattiG. (Eds.), From monkey brain to human brain (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
DehaeneS. (2009). Reading in the brain. New York, NY: Viking.
16.
DencklaM. B.RudelR. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.
17.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18.
GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR.KirbyJ. R.StephensonK. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 325–350.
19.
GibsonE. J.LevinH. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
KatzirT.KimY. S.WolfM.MorrisR.LovettM. W. (2008). The varieties of pathways to dysfluent reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 47–56.
21.
KirbyJ. R.GeorgiouG. K.MartinussenR.ParrilaR. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362.
22.
KirbyJ. R.ParrilaR. K.PfeifferS. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464.
23.
KirtleyC.BryantP.MacLeanM.BradleyL. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224–245.
24.
LanderlK.WimmerH. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.
25.
LepolaJ.PoskipartaE.LaakkonenE.NiemiP. (2005). Development of and relationship between phonological and motivational processes and naming speed in predicting word recognition in Grade 1. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 367–399.
26.
LervagA.HulmeC. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040–1048.
27.
LevyB. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In WolfM. (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain (pp. 357–379). Timonium, MD: York Press.
28.
LovettM. W.SteinbachK. S.FrijtersJ. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334–358.
29.
ManisF. R.SeidenbergM. S.BhadhaB. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–374.
30.
ManisF. R.SeidenbergM. S.DoiL. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157.
31.
McCardleP.ScarboroughH. S.CattsH. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing, children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 230–239.
32.
NeuhausG. F.SwankP. R. (2002). Understanding the relations between RAN letter subtest components and word reading in first-grade students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 156–174.
33.
PriceC. J.McCroryE. (2005). Functional brain imaging studies of skilled reading and developmental dyslexia. In SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 473–496). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
PriceC. J.McCroryE.NoppeneyU.MechelliA.MooreC. J.BiggioN.DevlinJ. T. (2006). How reading differs from object naming at the neuronal level. NeuroImage, 29, 643–648.
35.
RackJ. P.SnowlingM.OlsonR. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28–53.
36.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
SchatschneiderC.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.CarlsonC. D.FoormanB. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
38.
SeymourP. H. K.AroM.ErskineJ. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.
39.
ShareD. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.
40.
SnowlingM. J. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 294–305.
41.
SpectorJ. E. (2005). Instability of double-deficit subtypes among at-risk first grade readers. Reading Psychology, 26, 285–312.
42.
SunsethK.BowersP. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 401–429.
43.
VaessenA.GerretsenP.BlomertL. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 202–221.
44.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M. (2005). Developmental dyslexia. In SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 362–378). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
45.
VerhagenW.AarnoutseC.van LeeuweJ. (2008). Phonological awareness and naming speed in the prediction of Dutch children’s word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 301–324.
46.
VukovicR. K.SiegelL. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25–47.
47.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
48.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 74–87.
49.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.HechtS. A.BarkerT. A.BurgessS. R.. . . GaronT. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.
50.
WimmerH.MayringerH.LanderlK. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–480.
51.
WolfM.BallyH.MorrisR. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.
52.
WolfM.BowersP. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.
53.
WolfM.O’RourkeA. G.GidneyC.LovettM.CirinoP.MorrisR. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43–72.
54.
WoodcockR. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
