The primary purpose of the present study is to evaluate the emotional experience of students with (n = 52) and without attention problems (n = 272) during an achievement task. A secondary purpose of the present study is to compare students' emotional response to various stimuli, when motivated by various achievement goals. Participants were randomly assigned into a mastery goal condition, a normative performance goal condition, and a non-normative performance goal condition. Results, using a latent means analysis, indicate that students with attention problems needed additional time to process emotion-loaded but not neutral words, providing evidence for an interference effect. Furthermore, students in the performance-normative, relative to the performance non-normative, condition showed a salient interference effect with respect to various emotion-loaded and neutral words.
Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 323-338.
2.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation . Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3.
Atkins, M.S., & Pelham, W.E. (1991). School based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 197-204.
4.
Bentler, P.M. (2005). EQS Structural Equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: Scientific Software International .
5.
Block, J. (2005). The Stroop effect: Its relation to personality . Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 735-746.
6.
Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40, 167-176.
7.
Brown, M.B. (2000). Diagnosis and treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 195-203.
8.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
9.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Coles, M.E., & Heimberg, R.G. (2002). Memory biases in the anxiety disorders: Current status. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 587-627.
11.
Dunn, P.B., & Shapiro, S.K. (1999). Gender differences in the achievement goal orientations of ADHD children. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 327-344.
12.
DuPaul, G.L., McGoey, K.E., Eckert, T.L., & Van Brakle, J. (2001). Preschool children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Impairments in behavioral, social and school functioning. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 508-515.
Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
15.
Dykman, B.M. (1998). Integrating cognitive and motivational factors in depression: Initial tests of a goal-orientation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 139-158.
16.
Efklides, A., & Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students' metacognitive experiences . Learning and Instruction, 15, 415-431.
17.
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jacknife . Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
18.
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
19.
Efron, B. (1985). Bootstrap confidence intervals for a class of parametric problems. Biometrica, 72, 45-48.
20.
Eide, P., Kemp, A., Silberstein, R.B., Nathan, P.J., & Stough, C. (2002). Test-retest reliability of the emotional Stroop task: Examining the paradox of measurement change. Journal of Psychology, 136, 514-520.
21.
Elliot, A.J., & Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
22.
Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
23.
Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H.A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628-644.
24.
Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H.A. (2001). A 2X2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
25.
Elliot, A.J., McGregor, J.A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
26.
Erber, R., & Erber, W.M. (1994). Beyond mood and social judgment: Mood incongruent recall and mood regulation. European Journal of Social Psychology , 24, 79-88.
27.
Fan, X. (2003). Using commonly available software for bootstrapping in both substantive and measurement analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 24-50.
28.
Gable, S. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals . Journal of Personality, 74, 175-220.
29.
Genov, A., Shay, I., & Boone, R.T. (2002). Genov Modified Stroop Task (GMST) [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved September 7, 2005, from http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~booner/GMSTsite/index.htm
30.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C.S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
31.
Greene, R.W., Biederman, J., & Faraone, S.V. (2001). Social impairments in girls with ADHD: Patterns, gender comparisons and correlates. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 704-710.
32.
Hall, A.S., & Gushee, A.J. (2000). Diagnosis and treatment with attention deficit hyperactive youth: Mental health consultation with school counsellors. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22, 295-306.
33.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Carter, S.M., Lehto, A.T., & Elliot, A.J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284-1295.
34.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Pintrich, P.R., Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
35.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Tauer, J.M., Carter, S.M., & Elliot, A.J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330.
36.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998a). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 55-72.
38.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998b). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
39.
Jagacinski, C.M., & Nicholls, J.G. (1984). Conceptions of ability and related affects in task involvement and ego involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 909-919.
40.
Jagacinski, C.M., & Nicholls, J.G. (1987). Competence and affect in task involvement and ego involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 107-114.
41.
Jansson, B., & Lundh, L.G. (2006). The interactive role of worried mood and trait anxiety in the selective processing of subliminaly presented threat words . Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1195-1204.
42.
Kane, M.J., & Engle, R.W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 132, 47-70.
43.
Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M.J. (2002). Should childhood be a journey or a race? Response to Harackiewicz et al. (2002). Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 646-648.
44.
Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents' affect in school: The mediating role of coping strategies. Learning and Individual Differences , 11, 187-212.
45.
Karademas, E., Kafetsios, K., & Sideridis, G.D. (2007). Optimism, self-efficacy and information processing of threat and well being related stimuli. Stress and Health, 23, 285-294.
46.
Karademas, E., Sideridis, G.D., & Kafetsios, K. (2008). Health-related information processing and recent health problems: Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 28-38.
47.
Kelly, M.S., Best, C.T., & Kirk, U. (1989). Cognitive processing deficits in reading disabilities: A prefrontial cortical hypothesis. Brain and Cognition, 11, 275-293.
48.
Kirsch, S.J., Okzak, P.V., & Mounts, J.R.W. (2005). Violent video games induce an affect processing bias. Media Psychology, 7, 239-250.
49.
Klein, D.C., Fencil-Morse, E., & Seligman, M.E.P. (1976). Depression, learned helplessness, and the attribution of failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 11-26.
50.
Kuhl, J., & Kazen, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes Stroop interference . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382-399.
51.
Lee, F., Sheldon, K., & Turban, D. (2003). Personality and the goal striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 256-265.
52.
Linnenbrink, E.A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning . Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197-213.
53.
Lu, P.H., Boone, K.B., Jimenez, N., & Razani, J. (2004). Failure to inhibit the reading response on the Stroop test: A pathognomonic indicator of suspect effort. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 180-189.
54.
Maag, J.W., & Reid, R. (2006). Depression among students with learning disabilities: Assessing the risk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 3-10.
55.
MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
56.
McGregor, H., & Elliot, A.J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 381-395.
57.
Meinhardt, J., & Pekrun, R. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 477-500.
58.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
59.
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B.P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 36, 809-848.
60.
Onwuegbuzie, A., Levin, J.R., & Leach, N.L. (2003). Do effect sizes measure up? A brief assessment . Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 1, 37-40.
61.
Patrick, H., Anderman, L.H., Ryan, A.M., Edelin, K.C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers' communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35-58.
62.
Patrick, H., Turner, J.C., Meyer, D.K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance in mathematics . Teachers College Record, 105, 1521-1558.
63.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A.J., & Maier, M.A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583-597.
64.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research . Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105.
65.
Phaf, R.H., & Kan, K.J. (2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis . Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry , 38, 184-199.
66.
Pintrich, P.R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 554-555.
67.
Protopapas, A., Archonti, A., & Skaloumbakas, C. (in press). Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference. Cognitive Psychology.
68.
Ruiter, C.D., & Brosschot, J.F. (1994). The emotional Stroop interference effect in anxiety: Attentional bias or cognitive avoidance? Behavior Research & Therapy, 32, 315-319.
69.
Ryan, A.M., Kiefer, S.M., & Hopkins, N.B. (2004). Young adolescents' social motivation: An achievement goal perspective. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 13, pp. 301-330). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
70.
Ryan, A.M., Shim, S.S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature, and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1246-1263.
71.
Sabatino, D.A. (1982). Research on achievement motivation with learning disabled populations. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 1, 75-116.
72.
Savitz, J.B., & Jansen, P. (2003). The Stroop color-word interference test as an indicator of ADHD in poor readers. Journal of Genetic Psychology , 164, 319-333.
73.
Sideridis, G.D. (2005). Goal orientations, academic achievement, and depression: Evidence in favor of revised goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 366-375.
74.
Sideridis, G.D. (2008). Normative versus non-normative performance goals: Effects on behavioral and emotional regulation in achievement situations. In M. Wosnitza, S. Karabenick, & A. Efklides (Eds.), Motivation: Global or specific (pp. 321-338). New York: Springer.
75.
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
76.
Sundheim, T.P.V., & Voeller, K.S. (2004). Psychiatric implications of language disorders and learning disabilities: Risks and management. Journal of Child Neurology, 19, 814-826.
77.
Turner, J.C., Thorpe, P.K., & Meyer, D.K. (1998). Students' reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758-771.
78.
Urdan, T.C. (2004). Using multiple methods to assess students' perceptions of classroom goal structures. European Psychologist, 9, 222-231.
79.
Van Mourik, R., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J.A. (2005). The Stroop revisited: A meta analysis of interference control in AD/HD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 150-165.
