The present study examined social connectedness in a nature-based association. Social isolation and loneliness are pressing public health concerns linked to adverse outcomes. We aimed to explore potential benefits of an authentic framework where a group of men with long-term illness was studied in a nature-based association. The study was a theory-driven case study in which data were collected on different occasions in various nature areas. Fifteen semi-structured interviews and multiple group-based observations were performed and analyzed using a theory-based thematic analysis. The participants had a mean age of 72, the majority being retired. Different themes were identified, including being met with open arms, being in the same boat, being a community of men, gaining new knowledge, and being/getting back to oneself. Spending time together in nature with others with similar experiences of long-term illness was experienced as meaningful for these participants. The self-organized nature-based association offered rituals for relational communication, with promising indications for the long-term effects of future health interventions.
AddisM. E.MahalikJ. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5–14.
2.
AnnerstedtM.WährborgP. (2011). Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39, 371–388.
3.
BarretoM.VictorC.HammondC.EcclesA.RichinsM. T.QualterP. (2021). Loneliness around the world: Age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, Article 110066.
4.
BorysS.PerlmanD. (1985). Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 63–74.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
7.
CourtenayW. (2009). Theorising masculinity and men’s health. In BroomA.ToveyP. (Eds.), Men’s health. Body, identity and social context (pp. 9–26). Wiley.
8.
DiehmC. (2020). Connection to nature, deep ecology and conservation social science. Lexington Books.
9.
DunnA. L.AndersenR. E.JakicicJ. M. (1998). Lifestyle physical activity interventions: History, short-and long-term effects, and recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15(4), 398–412.
10.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
11.
GrillichL.TitscherV.KlingensteinP.KostialE.EmprechtingerR.KleringsI.SommerI.NikitinJ.LaireiterA. R. (2023). The effectiveness of interventions to prevent loneliness and social isolation in the community-dwelling and old population: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 33(2), 235–241.
12.
HaukelandP. I.NæssA. (2008). Dyp Glede: Arne Næss dybøkologi [Profound Joy: Arne Næss Deep Ecology] (1. udgave). Flux Forlag.
13.
HawkesS.BuseK. (2013). Gender and global health: evidence, policy, and inconvenient truths. The Lancet, 381, 1783–1787.
14.
HoangP.KingJ. A.MooreS.MooreK.ReichK.SidhuH.TanC. V.WhaleyC.McMillanJ. (2022). Interventions associated with reduced loneliness and social isolation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open, 5(10), e2236676.
15.
HøegmarkS.AndersenT. E.GrahnP.MejldalA.RoesslerK. K. (2021). The wildman programme—Rehabilitation and reconnection with nature for men with mental or physical health problems—A matched-control study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), Article 11465.
16.
HøegmarkS.AndersenT. E.GrahnP.RoesslerK. K. (2020). The Wildman programme. A nature-based rehabilitation programme enhancing quality of life for men on long-term sick leave: Study protocol for a matched controlled study In Denmark. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), Article 3368.
17.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2022). Social connection as a public health issue: The evidence and a systemic framework for prioritizing the “social” in social determinants of health. Annual review of Public Health, 43, 193–213.
18.
LackeyN. Q.TysorD. A.McNayG. D.JoynerL.BakerK. H.HodgeC. (2021). Mental health benefits of nature-based recreation: a systematic review. Annals of Leisure Research, 24(3), 379–393.
19.
LaermansJ.ScheersH.VandekerckhoveP.De BuckE. (2023). Friendly visiting by a volunteer for reducing loneliness or social isolation in older adults: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(4), e1359.
20.
LasgaardM.FriisK.ShevlinM. (2016). “Where are all the lonely people?” A population-based study of high-risk groups across the life span. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(10), 1373–1384.
21.
LaustsenL. M.EjlskovL.ChenD.LasgaardM.GradusJ. L.ØstergaardS. D.GrønkjærM. S.Plana-RipollO. (2024). Interaction between mental disorders and social disconnectedness on mortality: a population-based cohort study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 225(1), 282–289.
22.
MannF.WangJ.PearceE.MaR.SchliefM.Lloyd-EvansB.IkhtabiS.JohnsonS. (2022). Loneliness and the onset of new mental health problems in the general population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 57(11), 2161–2178.
23.
MeuweseD.van der VoortN.DijkstraK.KrabbendamL.MaasJ. (2021). The value of nature during psychotherapy: A qualitative study of client experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 765177.
24.
MygindL.KjeldstedE.HartmeyerR. D.MygindE.BøllingM.BentsenP. (2019). Immersive nature-experiences as health promotion interventions for healthy, vulnerable, and sick populations? A systematic review and appraisal of controlled studies [Systematic review]. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 943.
25.
NæssA.HaukelandP. I. (1999). Livsfilosofi: om følelser og fornuft [Life’s Philosophy: Emotions and Reason]. Multivers Aps Forlag.
26.
RöhrS.WittmannF.EngelC.EnzenbachC.WitteA. V.VillringerA.LöfflerM.Riedl-HellerS. G. (2022). Social factors and the prevalence of social isolation in a population-based adult cohort. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 57, 1959–1968.
27.
RosaH. (2019). Resonance: A sociology of our relationship to the world. Polity Press.
28.
RoyK.SmilowitzS.BhattS.ConroyM. L. (2023). Impact of social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Current understanding and future directions. Current Geriatrics Reports, 12, 138–148.
29.
StevensJ.BinnsA.MorganB.EggerG. (2017). Meaninglessness, alienation, and loss of culture/identity (MAL) as determinants of chronic disease. In EggerG.BinnsA.RössnerS.SagnerM. (Eds.), Lifestyle medicine (pp. 317–325). Academic Press.
30.
SullivanL.CamicP. M.BrownJ. S. L. (2015). Masculinity, alexithymia, and fear of intimacy as predictors of UK men’s attitudes towards seeking professional psychological help. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(1), 194–211.
31.
TanggaardL.BrinkmannS. (2020). Interviewet: samtale som forskningsmetode [Interview: Conversation as Research Method]. In: Kvalitative Metoder: En Grundbog [Qualitative Methods: A Textbook] (3. udgave, 1. oplag, pp. 33–64), Hans Reitzels Forlag.
32.
ThomsonL. J.SpiroN.WilliamonA.ChatterjeeH. J. (2023). The impact of culture-, health-and nature-based engagement on mitigating the adverse effects of public health restrictions on wellbeing, social connectedness and loneliness during COVID-19: Quantitative evidence from a smaller-and larger-scale UK survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(20), Article 6943.
33.
TrøstrupC. H.ChristiansenA. B.StølenK. S.NielsenP. K.StelterR. (2019). The effect of nature exposure on the mental health of patients: a systematic review. Qualitative Life Research, 28(7), 1695–1703.
34.
ZhangZ.YeB.YangW.GaoY. (2024). Effect of nature space on enhancing humans’ health and well-being: An integrative narrative review. Forests, 15(1), Article 100.
