The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated a massive turn to remote work, followed by subsequent shifts for many into hybrid or fully returning to the office. To understand the patterned dynamics of subjective well-being associated with shifting places of work, we conducted a nationally representative panel survey (October 2020 and April 2021) of U.S. employees who worked remotely at some point since the pandemic (N = 1,817). Cluster analysis identified four patterned constellations of well-being based on burnout, work–life conflict, and job and life satisfaction. A total return to office is generally more stressful, leading to significantly lower probabilities of being in the optimal low stress/high satisfaction constellation by Wave 2, especially for men and women without care obligations. Remote and hybrid arrangements have salutary effects; moving to hybrid is especially positive for minority men and less educated men, although it disadvantages White women’s well-being.
AckerJoan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society4(2):139–58.
2.
AllenTammy D.GoldenTimothy D.ShockleyKristen M.2015. “How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest16(2):40–68.
3.
AndersonDeirdreKelliherClare. 2020. “Enforced Remote Working and the Work–Life Interface during Lockdown.” Gender in Management35(7–8):677–83.
BloomNicholasLiangJamesRobertsJohnYingZhichun Jenny. 2015. “Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics130(1):165–218.
BrynjolfssonErikMcAfeeAndrew. 2016. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
ChesleyNoelle. 2014. “Information and Communication Technology Use, Work Intensification, and Employee Strain and Distress.” Work, Employment & Society28(4):589–610.
10.
ÇobanSevgi. 2022. “Gender and Telework: Work and Family Experiences of Teleworking Professional, Middle-Class, Married Women with Children during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Turkey.” Gender, Work, & Organization29(1):241–55.
CrenshawKimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43(6):1241–99.
13.
DanneferDale. 2020. “Systemic and Reflexive: Foundations of Cumulative Dis/advantage and Life-Course Process.” The Journals of Gerontology: Series B75(6):1249–63.
DunatchikAllisonGersonKathleenGlassJenniferJacobsJerry A.StritzelHaley. 2021. “Gender, Parenting, and the Rise of Remote Work during the Pandemic: Implications for Domestic Inequality in the United States.” Gender & Society35(2):194–205.
16.
FanWen. 2022. “Breadwinning, Occupational Sex Composition, and Stress: Examining Psychological Distress and Heavy Drinking at the Intersection of Gender and Race.” Gender & Society36(6):922–60.
17.
FanWenMoenPhyllis. 2022. “Working More, Less, or the Same during COVID-19? A Mixed Method, Intersectional Analysis of Remote Workers.” Work and Occupations49(2):143–86.
18.
FenwickRudyTausigMark. 1994. “The Macroeconomic Context of Job Stress.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior35(3):266–82.
19.
FoxKimberly E.JohnsonSydney T.BerkmanLisa F.SianojaMarjaanaSohYeneeKubzanskyLaura D.KellyErin L.2022. “Organisational- and Group-Level Workplace Interventions and Their Effect on Multiple Domains of Worker Well-being: A Systematic Review.” Work & Stress36(1):30–59.
20.
GajendranRavi S.HarrisonDavid A.2007. “The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown about Telecommuting: Meta-analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences.” Journal of Applied Psychology92(6):1524–41.
21.
GoldenTimothy D.VeigaJohn F.SimsekZeki. 2006. “Telecommuting’s Differential Impact on Work–Family Conflict: Is There No Place Like Home?” Journal of Applied Psychology91(6):1340–50.
22.
HaleThomasAngristNoamGoldszmidtRafaelKiraBeatrizPetherickAnnaPhillipsTobyWebsterSamuel, et al. 2021. “A Global Panel Database of Pandemic Policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).” Nature Human Behaviour5(4):529–38.
23.
HastieTrevorTibshiraniRobertFriedmanJerome H.2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York, NY: Springer.
24.
HillE. JeffreyFerrisMariaMärtinsonVjollca. 2003. “Does It Matter Where You Work? A Comparison of How Three Work Venues (Traditional Office, Virtual Office, and Home Office) Influence Aspects of Work and Personal/Family Life.” Journal of Vocational Behavior63(2):220–41.
KadukAnneGenadekKatieKellyErin L.MoenPhyllis. 2019. “Involuntary vs. Voluntary Flexible Work: Insights for Scholars and Stakeholders.” Community, Work, & Family22(4):412–42.
27.
KallebergArne L.2018. Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity and Well-being in Rich Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
28.
KelliherClareAndersonDeirdre. 2010. “Doing More with Less? Flexible Working Practices and the Intensification of Work.” Human Relations63(1):83–106.
29.
KellyErin L.MoenPhyllis. 2021. Overload: How Good Jobs Went Bad and What We Can Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
KellyErin L.MoenPhyllisOakesJ. MichaelFanWenOkechukwuCassandraDavisKelly D.HammerLeslie B., et al. 2014. “Changing Work and Work–Family Conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network.” American Sociological Review79(3):485–516.
31.
KimJaeseungHenlyJulia R.GoldenLonnie M.LambertSusan J.2020. “Workplace Flexibility and Worker Well-being by Gender.” Journal of Marriage and Family82(3):892–910.
KossekEllen ErnstLautschBrenda A.EatonSusan C.2006. “Telecommuting, Control, and Boundary Management: Correlates of Policy Use, Job Control, and Work–Family Effectiveness.” Journal of Vocational Behavior68(2):347–67.
34.
LandivarLiana ChristinRuppannerLeahScarboroughWilliam J.CollinsCaitlyn. 2020. “Early Signs Indicate That COVID-19 Is Exacerbating Gender Inequality in the Labor Force.” Socius6. doi:10.1177/2378023120947997.
35.
LongJ. ScottMustilloSarah A.2018. “Using Predictions and Marginal Effects to Compare Groups in Regression Models for Binary Outcomes.” Sociological Methods & Research50(3):1284–320.
36.
MarxKarl. 1964. Early Writings. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37.
MasAlexandrePallaisAmanda. 2020. “Alternative Work Arrangements.” Annual Review of Economics12:631–58.
38.
MaslachChristinaSchaufeliWilmar B.LeiterMichael P.2001. “Job Burnout.” Annual Review of Psychology52:397–422.
39.
MoenPhyllis. 2022. “The Uneven Stress of Social Change: Work Disruptions, Disparities, and Mental Health.” Society and Mental Health12(2):85–98.
40.
MoenPhyllisKellyErin L.FanWenLeeShi-RongAlmeidaDavidKossekEllen ErnstBuxtonOrfeu M.2016. “Does a Flexibility/Support Organizational Initiative Improve High-Tech Employees’ Well-being? Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network.” American Sociological Review81(1):134–64.
41.
MoenPhyllisPedtkeJoseph H.FloodSarah. 2020. “Disparate Disruptions: Intersectional COVID-19 Employment Effects by Age, Gender, Education, and Race-Ethnicity.” Work, Aging, and Retirement6(4):207–28.
42.
MoenPhyllisRoehlingPatricia. 2005. The Career Mystique: Cracks in the American Dream. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
MöhringKatjaNaumannEliasReifenscheidMaximilianeWenzAlexanderRettigTobiasKriegerUlrichFriedelSabine, et al. 2021. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and Subjective Well-being: Longitudinal Evidence on Satisfaction with Work and Family.” European Societies23(Suppl. 1):S601–17.
44.
PadavicIreneReskinBarbara F.2002. Women and Men at Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
45.
PageKathryn M.Vella-BrodrickDianne A.2009. “The ‘What,’ ‘Why’ and ‘How’ of Employee Well-being: A New Model.” Social Indicators Research90(3):441–58.
46.
PearlinLeonard I.1989. “The Sociological Study of Stress.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior30(3):241–56.
47.
PearlinLeonard I.2010. “The Life Course and the Stress Process: Some Conceptual Comparisons.” The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science65(2):207–15.
48.
PearlinLeonard I.BiermanAlex. 2013. “Current Issues and Future Directions in Research into the Stress Process.” Pp. 325–40 in Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health, edited by AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA.Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
49.
Penha-LopesVânia. 2006. “‘To Cook, Sew, to Be a Man’: The Socialization for Competence and Black Men’s Involvement in Housework.” Sex Roles54(3–4):261–74.
50.
RayVictor. 2019. “A Theory of Racialized Organizations.” American Sociological Review84 (1):26–53.
51.
SchiemanScottGlavinPaul. 2008. “Trouble at the Border? Gender, Flexibility at Work, and the Work–Home Interface.” Social Problems55(4):590–611.
52.
SchiemanScottGlavinPaulMilkieMelissa A.2009. “When Work Interferes with Life: Work–Nonwork Interference and the Influence of Work-Related Demands and Resources.” American Sociological Review74(6):966–88.
SueDerald WingLinAnnie I.RiveraDavid P.2009. “Racial Microaggressions in the Workplace: Manifestation and Impact.” Pp. 157–72 in Diversity in Mind and in Action, Vol. 2: Disparities and Competence, edited by ChinJ. L.Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
55.
SullivanCathSmithsonJanet. 2007. “Perspectives of Homeworkers and Their Partners on Working Flexibility and Gender Equity.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3):448–61.
56.
ThoitsPeggy A.2011. “Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior52(2):145–61.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Vol. 1. Oakland: University of California Press.
59.
WheatonBlairClarkePhilippa. 2003. “Space Meets Time: Integrating Temporal and Contextual Influences on Mental Health in Early Adulthood.” American Sociological Review68(5):680–706.
60.
WheatonBlairYoungMarisaMontazerShirinStuart-LahmanKatie. 2013. “Social Stress in the Twenty-First Century.” Pp. 299–323 in Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health, edited by AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA.Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
61.
WilliamsJoan C.2000. Unbending Gender. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
WingfieldAdia HarveyAlstonRenée Skeete. 2014. “Maintaining Hierarchies in Predominantly White Organizations: A Theory of Racial Tasks.” American Behavioral Scientist58(2):274–87.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
