This mixed methods study examined doctoral students’ (N = 22) perceptions of mixed methods research, as well as their training needs. We used descriptive statistics to analyze closed-ended survey data and axial coding to analyze open-ended survey responses, course discussion boards, and qualitative interview data. The findings have implications for education doctoral programs as they consider requirements for research methods sequences. Findings suggest that there are advantages to including mixed methods coursework for doctoral students in schools of education and that the experiences can help strengthen students’ overall research skills, influence future research experiences, and aid in identification of needs for more training.
BazeleyP. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage.
2.
ÇelikS.DoǧanM. (2022). Mixed methods research in special education in Turkey: Learning from researcher experiences in graduate thesis. The Qualitative Report, 27(7), 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5375
3.
ChewP. K.DillonD. B. (2014). Statistics anxiety update: Refining the construct and recommendations for a new research agenda. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 9(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613518077
4.
CookK. D.CatanzaroB. A. (2023). “Constantly working on my attitude towards statistics!” Education doctoral students' experiences with and motivations for learning statistics. Innovative Higher Education, 48(2), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09621-w
5.
CorrC.LoveH.SnodgrassM. R.KernJ. L.ChudzikM. (2023). Methodological training in special education doctoral programs: A mixed-methods exploration. Teacher education and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 46(2), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064221103902
6.
CreamerE. G. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455–472). Academic Press.
8.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
9.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (3rd ed.). Sage.
10.
GardnerS. K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x
11.
GeeJ. P. (2010). A situated-sociocultural approach to literacy and technology. In The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice (pp. 165–193). The Guilford Press.
12.
GibsonC. B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639133
13.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
14.
HallJ. N.HowardK. A. S. (2008). A synergistic approach: Conducting mixed methods research with typological and interactive analyses. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808314622
15.
HendrenK.NewcomerK.PandeyS. K.SmithM.SumnerN. (2023). How qualitative research methods can be leveraged to strengthen mixed methods research in public policy and public administration?Public Administration Review, 83(3), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13528
16.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
17.
KerriganM.HayesK. M. (2016). EdD students’ self-efficacy and interest in conducting research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.28945/3413
18.
LekoM. M.HitchcockJ. H.LoveH. R.HouchinsD. E.ConroyM. A. (2023). Quality indicators for mixed-methods research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141031
19.
McAlpineL.AmundsenC. (2011). Doctoral education research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators. Springer.
MertensD. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
22.
MilnerH. R.IV (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934712442539
23.
Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2011). The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810384490
PallasA. M. (2001). Preparing education doctoral students for epistemological diversity. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030005006
26.
Plano ClarkV. L.GarrettA. L.Leslie-PeleckyD. L. (2010). Applying three strategies for integrating quantitative and qualitative databases in a mixed methods study of a nontraditional graduate education program. Field Methods, 22(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09357174
27.
PonceO. A.Pagán-MaldonadoN. (2015). Mixed methods research in education: Capturing the complexity of the profession. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.18562/ijee.2015.0005
28.
PothC. N. (2020). Confronting complex problems with adaptive mixed methods research practices. Caribbean Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 29–46.
29.
PoveeK.RobertsL. D. (2015). Attitudes toward mixed methods research in psychology: The best of both worlds?International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.872399
30.
ŞahinM. D.OzturkG. (2019). Mixed method research: Theoretical foundations, designs and its use in educational research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.574002
31.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
32.
ToramanS. (2021). How recent doctorates learned about mixed methods research through sources: A mixed methods social network analysis study. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1637150105919799
33.
Toraman TurkS.CoxK.Plano ClarkV. L. (2025). Measuring the degree of mixed methods adoption: An investigation using doctoral dissertation abstracts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 19(3), 15586898241313245. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241313245
