Those who implement character education initiatives intend for those initiatives to be effective in promoting the development of character. To maximize this likelihood, it is important to consider common problems of implementation and assessment. This article addresses four challenges to effective implementation: (a) what counts as evidence of effectiveness, (b) how to know about such evidence, (c) how to implement with fidelity, and (d) how to align implementation with targeted outcomes. Assessment is critical to addressing the challenge of effective practice. Here, we examine three core areas of assessment in character education: (a) implementation (process evaluation), (b) school climate, and (c) character development (outcome assessment).
BerkowitzM. W. (1998). A primer for evaluating a character education initiative. Washington D.C.: Character.org
2.
BerkowitzM. W. (2021). PRIMED for Character Education: Six Design Principles for School Improvement. Routledge.
3.
BerkowitzM. W.BierM. C. (2007). What works in character education. Journal of Research in Character Education, 5, 29–48.
4.
BerkowitzM. W.BierM. C.McCauleyB. (2017). Toward a science of character education: Frameworks for identifying and implementing effective practices. Journal of Character Education, 13(1), 33–51.
5.
BelandK. (Ed.). (2008). 11 principles for character education sourcebook. Character Education Partnership.
6.
BenningaJ. S.BerkowitzM. W. (Eds.). (2017). National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine workshop on approaches to the development of character: Part 2 [Special issue]. Journal of Character Education, 13(2).
ColbyA.KohlbergL.FentonE.Speicher-DubinB.LiebermanM. (1977). Secondary school moral discussion programs led by social studies teachers. Journal of Moral Education, 6, 90–111.
11.
DingC.LiuY.BerkowitzM. (2011). The study of factor structure and reliability of an abbreviated school climate survey. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 241–256.
LiuY.DingC.AuthorBierM. C. (2014). A psychometric evaluation of a revised school climate survey. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29(1), 54–67.
15.
McTigheJ.ThomasR. S. (2003). Backward design for forward action. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 52–55.
16.
National School Climate Council. (2015). School climate and pro-social educational improvement: Essential goals and processes that support student success for all. Teachers College Record. http://www.tcrecord.org
17.
SlobodaZ.StephensR. C.StephensP. C.GreyS. F.TeasdaleB.HawthorneR. D.WilliamsJ.MarquetteJ. F. (2009). The adolescent substance abuse prevention study: A randomized field trial of a universal substance abuse prevention program. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 102, 1–10.
18.
SolomonD.BattistichV.WatsonM.SchapsE.LewisC. (2000). A six-district study of educational change: Direct and mediated effects of the child development project. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 3–51. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009609606692
