To investigate differential effects of multicultural interactions (MIs) and exposures (MEs) and to test Maddux et al.’s new structural model of multicultural experience, this research examines the impact of MIs and MEs on intrapersonal versus interpersonal creative thinking. Study 1 tests the associations of MIs and MEs with creative thinking in idea generation and conceptual conflict resolution. Study 2 examines MIs’ and MEs’ relationship with creative thinking in applied conflict resolution (i.e., international business negotiation), with closed-mindedness as a mediator. Results show that MIs (but not MEs) were positively associated with self-reported (intrapersonal) measures of creative thinking in conflict resolution (CTCR), whereas MEs (but not MIs) were positively associated with creative thinking (interpersonal) outcomes in realistic, business conflict resolution contexts. Closed-mindedness fully mediated the former and partially mediated the latter association.
AdkinsR. (2006). Conflict management quiz. Cited in Rubio, M. A. E., & Picardo, R. L. (2017). Leadership, management and conflict management styles among nurse middle managers. University of the Visayas Journal of Research, 11(1).
2.
AffinitoS. J.AntoineG. E.GrayK.MadduxW. W. (2023). Negative multicultural experiences can increase intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104498
3.
AgarsM. D.KaufmanJ. C.DeaneA.SmithB. (2012). Fostering individual creativity through organizational context: A review of recent research and recommendations for organizational leaders. In MumfordM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 271-291). Academic Press.
4.
AytugZ. G.KernM. C.DilchertS. (2018). Multicultural experience: A multidimensional perspective, scale development, and validation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 65, 1–16.
5.
AytugZ. G.RuaT.BrazealD. V.AlmarazJ. A.GonzalezC. B. (2018). A sociocultural approach to multicultural experience: Why interactions matter for creative thinking but exposures don’t. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64, 29–42.
6.
BirdiK. (2016). Creativity training. In ShiptonH.BudhwarP. S.SparrowP.BrownA. (Eds.), Human resource management, innovation and performance (pp. 298–312). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137465191_19
7.
BrettJ. M.ThompsonL. (2016). Negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 68–79.
8.
BrileyD. A.WyerR. S. (2001). Transitory determinants of values and decisions: The utility (or nonutility) of individualism and collectivism in understanding cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19, 197–227.
CarnevaleP. J. (2006). Creativity in the outcomes of conflict. In DeutschM.ColemanP. T.MarcusE. C. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 414–435). Jossey-Bass.
11.
ChaoM. M.KungF. Y. H.YaoD. J. (2015). Understanding the divergent effects of multicultural exposure. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 78–88.
12.
ChrysikouE. G.MotykaK.NigroC.YangS.-I.Thompson-SchillS. L. (2016). Functional fixedness in creative thinking tasks depends on stimulus modality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000050
13.
CochranW. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
ColeM. (2005). Cross-cultural and historical perspectives on the developmental consequences of education. Human Development, 48(4), 195–216.
16.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 242–266.
17.
DanielsH.ColeM.WertschJ. V. (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge University Press.
18.
De DreuC. K. W. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277795
19.
De DreuC. K. W.BeersmaB.StroebeK.EuwemaM. C. (2006). Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 927–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.927
20.
De DreuC. K. W.KooleS. L.OldersmaF. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 348–362.
21.
De DreuC. K. W.KooleS. L.SteinelW. (2000a). Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information processing approach to integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 975–987.
22.
De DreuC. K. W.WeingartL. R.KwonS. (2000b). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 889–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.889
23.
DiMaggioP. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 263–287.
24.
DonohueD. (2022). Religiosity and multicultural experiences predict cultural values in college students. Current Psychology, 41, 539–548.
25.
EndicottL.BockT.NarvaezD. (2003). Moral reasoning, intercultural development, and multicultural experiences: Relations and cognitive underpinnings. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 403–419.
Eurostat. (2013). Innovation statistics—Proportion of innovative enterprises by type of methods for stimulating creativity considered highly successful, 2008-2010. https://tinyurl.com/byxb2kmz
28.
FisherR.UryW.PattonB. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.
29.
FiskeS. T.LinvilleP. W. (1980). What does the schema concept buy us?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 543–547.
30.
FordJ. K.MacCallumR. C.TaitM. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2), 291–314.
31.
ForsterN. (2000). Expatriates and the impact of cross-cultural training. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(3), 63–78.
GasparD.MabicM. (2015). Creativity in higher education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 598–605.
34.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524.
35.
GochenourT.JanewayA. (1993). Seven concepts in cross-cultural interaction: A training design. In GochenourT. (Ed.), Beyond experience: An experiential approach to cross-cultural education (pp. 1–10). Intercultural Press.
36.
GoldsteinS. B. (2022). A systematic review of short-term study abroad research methodology and intercultural competence outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 87, 26–36.
37.
GopnikA.O’GradyS.LucasC. G.GriffithsT. L.WenteA.BridgersS.AboodyR.FungH.DahlR. E. (2017). Changes in cognitive flexibility and hypothesis search across human life history from childhood to adolescence to adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7892–7899.
38.
GrajzelK.AcarS.SingerG. (2023). The Big Five and divergent thinking: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 214, 112338.
39.
GredlerM. E.ShieldsC. C. (2008). Vygotsky’s legacy: A foundation for research and practice. The Guilford Press.
40.
GuadagnoliE.VelicerW. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
41.
Guaman-QuintanillaS.EveraertP.ChiluizaK.ValckeM.McKenzieW. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: A multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 217–240.
42.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
43.
HaoN.YuanH.ChengR.WangQ.RuncoM. A. (2015). Interaction effect of response medium and working memory capacity on creative idea generation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01582
44.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
45.
HinkinT. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.
46.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
47.
HuongL.TranT.BuiH. (2024). Professional development activities of English language lecturers in Vietnam through the lens of sociocultural theory. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.37
48.
IpG. W.ChenJ.ChiuC. (2006). The relationship of promotion focus, need for closure, and categorical accessibility in American and Hong Kong Chinese university students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(3), 201–215.
49.
IsidoriE.AlonziR.De MartinoM. (2023). Creativity and conflict management—From theory to practice. In PetrovaI.LeonovaI.IsidoriE. (Eds.), Creative person and the development of creativity: A challenge for contemporary society (pp. 49–58). Quapeg Editions.
50.
JamesK. (1995). Goal conflict and originality of thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 285–290.
51.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
52.
John-SteinerV.MahnH. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.
53.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (2023). LISREL 12.4 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.
54.
KerstenG. E. (2001). Modeling distributive and integrative negotiations. Review and revised characterization. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012256222803
55.
KharkhurinA. V. (2011). Conceptual freedom of the globalized mind: Multicultural experiences enhance human cognition through the expansion of conceptual categories. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(3–4), 66–83.
KilmannR. H.ThomasK. W. (1977). Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The MODE instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(2), 309–325.
58.
KruglanskiA. W. (2004). The psychology of closed-mindedness. Psychology Press.
59.
LaxD. A.SebeniusJ. K. (1986). The manager as negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. Free Press.
60.
LeungA. K. Y.ChiuC. Y. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 41(5-6), 723–741.
61.
LeungA. K. Y.MadduxW. W.GalinskyA. D.ChiuC. Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169–181.
62.
LuJ. G.QuoidbachJ.GinoF.ChakroffA.MadduxW. W.GalinskyA. D. (2017). The dark side of going abroad: How broad foreign experiences increase immoral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 1–16.
63.
MadduxW. W.AdamH.GalinskyA. D. (2010). When in Rome. . . learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 731–741.
64.
MadduxW. W.GalinskyA. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1047–1061.
65.
MadduxW. W.LeungA. K.ChiuC.GalinskyA. D. (2009). Toward a more complete understanding of the link between multicultural experience and creativity. American Psychologist, 64(2), 156–158.
66.
MadduxW. W.LuJ. G.AffinitoS. J.GalinskyA. D. (2021). Multicultural experiences: A systematic review and new theoretical framework. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 345–376.
67.
MakelaK.BrewsterC. (2009). Interunit interaction contexts, interpersonal social capital, and the differing levels of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20300
68.
MalhotraD.BazermanM. H. (2007). Negotiation genius: How to overcome obstacles and achieve brilliant results at the bargaining table and beyond. Bantam Books.
69.
MarcoulidesK. M.RaykovT. (2019). Evaluation of variance inflation factors in regression models using latent variable modeling methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(5), 874–882.
70.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
71.
MartinM. M.RubinR. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623–626.
72.
McCaffreyT. (2012). Innovation relies on the obscure: A key to overcoming the classic problem of functional fixedness. Psychological Science, 23(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429580
73.
McKayA. S.Reiter-PalmonR.CoombesS. M.HoytC. L.ArnoldJ. D. (2024). A meta-analysis of creativity training in organizational settings. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12605
74.
McKayD.MakriS.ChangS.BuchananG. (2020). On birthing dancing stars: The need for bounded chaos in information interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ’20) (pp. 292–302). https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3377983.
MumfordM. D.HesterK. S.RobledoI. C. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Importance and approaches. In MumfordM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–16). Academic Press.
77.
NarvaezD.HillP. L. (2010). The relation of multicultural experiences to moral judgment and mindsets. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(1), 43–55.
Pérez-YusM. C.Ayllón-NegrilloE.DelsignoreG.Magallón-BotayaR.Aguilar-LatorreA.Oliván BlázquezB. (2020). Variables associated with negotiation effectiveness: The role of mindfulness. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01214
80.
PratomoL. C.WardaniD. K. (2021). The effectiveness of design thinking in improving student creativity skills and entrepreneurial alertness. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 695–712.
81.
Puente-DiazR.ToptasS. D.Cavazos-ArroyoJ.WimschneiderC.BremA. (2019). Creative potential and multicultural experiences: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 815–823.
82.
RichG. J. (2009). Big C, little c, big M, little m. American Psychologist, 64(2), 155–156.
83.
RichardsonD. C.TagomoriH.DevlinJ. T. (2022). Can extreme experiences enhance creativity? The case of the underwater nightclub. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902196
84.
RichterA. W.HirstG.van KnippenbergD.BaerM. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282–1290.
85.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
86.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
87.
RossS. D.LachmannT.JaarsveldS.PieperL.von MüllerA. (2023). Creativity across the lifespan: Changes with age and with dementia. BMC Geriatrics, 23, 160.
88.
RothmanJ. (1997). Resolving identity-based conflict in nations, organizations, and communities. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
89.
RuncoM. A. (2003). Idea evaluation, divergent thinking, and creativity. In RuncoM. A. (Ed.), Critical creative processes: Perspectives on creativity research (pp. 69–94). Hampton Press.
90.
SheaC. H.WulfG. (2005). Schema theory: A critical appraisal and reevaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(2), 85–102.
91.
SirkováM.Ali TahaV.FerencováM.SafarL. (2014). An analytical study on organizational creativity: Implications for management. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 10, 179–187.
92.
SmithS. M.WardT. B.FinkeR. A. (1995). The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press.
93.
SowdenP. T.PringleA.GaboraL. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.885464
94.
SundquistD.LubartT. (2022). Being intelligent with emotions to benefit creativity: Emotion across the seven Cs of creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 106.
95.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296.
96.
TadmorC. T.GalinskyA. D.MadduxW. W. (2012). Getting the most out of living abroad: Biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 520–542.
97.
TeiglandR.ChenY.FeyC. (2009). Contingency effects of national culture and institutions on how social networks influence creativity. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2009(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2009.44262778
98.
TenenbergJ.KnobelsdorfM. (2014). Out of our minds: A review of sociocultural cognition theory. Computer Science Education, 24(1), 1–24.
99.
ThompsonL. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
TindaleR. S.StawiskiS. (2010). Socially shared cognitions. In LevineJ. M.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 811–815). Sage.
102.
UryW. (2007). Getting past no: Negotiating in difficult situations. Bantam Books.
103.
van GriethuijsenR. A. L. F.van EijckM. W.HasteH.den BrokP. J.SkinnerN. C.MansourN.GencerA. S.BouJaoudeS. (2015). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45, 581–603.
104.
WardT. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.
105.
WardT. B.PattersonM. J.SifonisC. M.DoddsR. A.SaundersK. N. (2002). The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought. Memory & Cognition, 30, 199–216.
106.
WebsterD. M.KruglanskiA. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062.
107.
WertschJ. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In RogoffB.WertschJ. (Eds.), Children’s Learning in the “Zone of Proximal Development” (pp. 7–18). Jossey-Bass Inc.
108.
WonY.BaeY.ChoiY.ParkH. (2019). The effects of design thinking training on creativity competency for college students. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 193–226.
109.
XuY.FlambardV. (2022). Introducing multicultural experiences through virtual partnerships. Journal of Education for Business, 97(4), 261–269.
110.
YooB.DonthuN.LenartowiczT. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3–4), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.578059
111.
ZaidelD. W. (2014). Creativity, brain, and art: Biological and neurological considerations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00389
112.
ZhangJ. W.HowellR. T.JanuchowskiJ. A.BlumenthalH.KlipkerK.CoffeyJ. K.RobbinsM. L.OsbornT. L.SchwartzB.Nelson-CoffeyS. K.RuggiD.LyubomirskyS. (2023). Awe, curiosity, and multicultural experience. Journal of Personality, 91(3), 667–682.
113.
ZhouJ.GeorgeJ. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.
