Based on theorization on the four basic dimensions of religiousness, Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging, and corresponding cognitive, emotional, moral, and social motives and functions of religion, we developed a measure and investigated cross-cultural consistency of the four dimensions as well interindividual and cross-cultural variability. Data were collected from 14 countries varying in religious heritage: Catholicism, Protestantism, Orthodox Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Buddhism/Taoism (N = 3,218). Beyond their high interrelation and common personality correlates, that is, agreeableness and conscientiousness, the four dimensions were distinct across cultures and religions, less interrelated in Eastern Asia compared to the West, differentially preferred across cultural zones, and characterized by distinct features. Believing and bonding, to which spirituality was primarily related, were preferred in Western secular societies. Behaving and belonging, valued in religious societies, were importantly related to fundamentalism, authoritarianism, and low openness. Bonding and behaving were primordial in, respectively, Israel and Turkey. Furthermore, belonging (marked by extraversion) and bonding were uniquely associated with increased life satisfaction, whereas believing was uniquely related to existential quest and decreased life satisfaction. Thus, the multidimensionality of religiousness seems deeply rooted in distinct psychological dispositions evident at both the individual and the cultural levels.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (2004). A revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4
BollenK. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124189017003004
4.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
5.
*ClobertM.SaroglouV.HwangK.-K. (2017). East Asian religious tolerance vs. Western monotheist prejudice: The role of (in)tolerance of contradiction. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(2), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430215603458
6.
CohenA. B.GorvineB. J.GorvineH. (2013). The religion, spirituality, and psychology of Jews. In PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1, pp. 665–679). American Psychological Association.
7.
CohenA. B.HallD. E.KoenigH. G.MeadorK. G. (2005). Social versus individual motivation: Implications for normative definitions of religious orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 48–61.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
9.
*CohuM.MaisonneuveC.TestéB. (2018). Construction et validation de l’échelle de mesure des croyances relatives à la laïcité [Construction and validation of a measure of beliefs relative to “laïcité”]. Psychologie Française, 63(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2017.09.001
10.
*DaghighA.DeShongH. L.DaghighV.NiaziM.TitusC. E. (2019). Exploring the relation between religiosity and narcissism in an Iranian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 139(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.040
11.
DeakC.SaroglouV. (2015). Opposing abortion, gay adoption, euthanasia, and suicide: Compassionate openness or self-centered moral rigorism?Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 37(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1163%2F15736121-12341309
DillonM. (2007). Age, generation, and cohort in American religion and spirituality. In BeckfordJ. A.DemerathN. J., III (Eds.), The Sage handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 526–546). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848607965.n26
14.
*DimitrovaR. (2014). The big four dimensions of religiousness and life satisfaction among Dutch and Italian young adults. In MikuckaM.SaraccinoF. (Eds.), Life satisfaction: Perceptions, social influences and implications for long-term health. Nova Publishers.
15.
*DimitrovaR.Domínguez EspinosaA. d. C. (2017a). Factorial structure and measurement invariance of the Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale among Mexican males and females. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2), 231–238. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rel0000102
16.
*DimitrovaR.Domínguez EspinosaA. d. C. (2017b). Relationships between religiousness and life satisfaction among emerging adults in Mexico and Nicaragua. In DimitrovaR. (Ed.), Well-being of youth and emerging adults across cultures (pp. 225–234). Springer International.
17.
DuriezB. (2003). Vivisecting the religious mind: Religiosity and motivated social cognition. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 6(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367467031000085928
18.
EpsteinS. (2014). Cognitive-experiential theory: An integrative theory of personality. Oxford University Press.
19.
FiskeS. T. (2014). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology (3rd ed.). Wiley.
20.
FunkeF. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x
21.
GebauerJ. E.BleidornW.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.LambM. E.PotterJ. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(6), 1064–1091. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0037683
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
25.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
26.
HaywardD.KrauseN. (2014). Religion, mental health, and well-being: Social aspects. In SaroglouV. (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 254–280). Psychology Press.
27.
Hervieu-LégerD. (1999). Le pèlerin et le converti: La religion en mouvement [The pilgrim and the convert: Religion in movement]. Flammarion.
28.
HillP. C. (2013). Measurement assessment and issues in the psychology of religion and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 48–74). Guilford.
29.
HindeR. A. (1999). Why gods persist: A scientific approach to religion. Routledge.
30.
HoodR. W.Jr.HillP. C.WilliamsonW. P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism. Guilford.
JohnsonK. A.HookJ. N.DavisD. E.Van TongerenD. R.SandageS. J.CrabtreeS. A. (2016). Moral foundation priorities reflect US Christians’ individual differences in religiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.037
35.
JohnsonK. A.SharpC. A.OkunM. A.ShariffA. F.CohenA. B. (2018). SBNR identity: The role of impersonal God representations, individualistic spirituality, and dissimilarity with religious groups. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 28(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2018.1445893
36.
JoshanlooM.GebauerJ. E. (2020). Religiosity’s nomological network and temporal change: Introducing an extensive country-level religiosity index based on Gallup World Poll data. European Psychologist, 25(1), 26–40. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1016-9040/a000382
37.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
38.
*KumarS.RanjeetaJ.ReenaS. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance testing of the Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale in India. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rel0000305
39.
LewisC. A.LoewenthalK. M. (Eds.). (2018). Religion and obsessionality: Obsessive actions and religious practices [special issue]. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 21(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1481192
40.
MacDonaldD. A. (2000). Spirituality: Description, measurement, and relation to the Five Factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68(1), 153–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.t01-1-00094
41.
McCulloughM. E.WilloughbyB. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-control, and self-regulation: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69–93. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0014213
42.
MolteniF.BiolcatiF. (2018). Shifts in religiosity across cohorts in Europe: A multilevel and multidimensional analysis based on the European Values Study. Social Compass, 65(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0037768618772969
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
45.
ParkC. L.SlatteryJ. M. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and mental health. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 540–559). Guilford.
PiazzaJ.LandyJ. F. (2013). “Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral thinking. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(6), 639–661.
48.
RamboL. R.FarhadianC. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of religious conversion. Oxford University Press.
49.
RoudometofV. (2010). The evolution of Greek Orthodoxy in the context of world historical globalization. In RoudometofV.MakridesV. N. (Eds.), Orthodox Christianity in 21st century Greece (pp. 23–38). Ashgate.
50.
RowattW. C.ShenM. J.LaBouffJ. P.GonzalezA. (2013). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and prejudice. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 457–475). Guilford.
51.
*RuslanR.ArielaJ.Handayani SutantoS. (2020). The influence of religiosity to marriage satisfaction among parents of children with Down syndrome. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology, 7(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu103
52.
SaroglouV. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1088868309352322
53.
SaroglouV. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022022111412267
54.
SaroglouV. (2012). Adolescents’ social development and the role of religion: Coherence at the detriment of openness. In TrommsdorffG.ChenX. (Eds.), Values, religion, and culture in adolescent development (pp. 391–423). Cambridge University Press.
55.
SaroglouV. (2014). Conclusion: Understanding religion and irreligion. In SaroglouV. (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 361–391). Psychology Press.
56.
SaroglouV. (2016). Intergroup conflict, religious fundamentalism, and culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022022115621174
57.
SaroglouV. (2017). Culture, personality, and religiosity. In ChurchA. T. (Ed.), The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures (Vol. 2, pp. 153–184). Praeger.
58.
SaroglouV. (2019). Religion and related morality across cultures. In MatsumotoD.HwangH. C. (Eds.), The handbook of culture and psychology (2nd ed., pp. 724–785). Oxford University Press.
59.
SaroglouV.CohenA. B. (2013). Cultural and cross-cultural psychology of religion. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 330–353). Guilford.
60.
SasakiJ. Y.KimH. S. (2011). At the intersection of culture and religion: A cultural analysis of religion’s implications for secondary control and social affiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 401–414. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0021849
SteenkampJ. B. E.BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528
63.
StreibH.KellerB.CsöffR.SilverC. F. (2008). Deconversion: Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
64.
StrozierC. B.TermanD. M.JonesJ. W. (Eds.). (2010). The fundamentalist mindset. Oxford University Press.
65.
*Tapia ValladaresJ.RojasM.VillalobosM. (2013). Fundamentalismo religioso entre jóvenes universitarios de Costa Rica: Conservadurismo político y espiritualidad sin religion. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 139, 115–135.
66.
TsangJ.McCulloughM. E. (2003). Measuring religious constructs: A hierarchical approach to construct organization and scale selection. In SnyderC. R. (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychological assessment (pp. 345–360). American Psychological Association.
67.
Van CappellenP.Toth-GauthierM.SaroglouV.FredricksonB. L. (2016). Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9605-5
68.
Van PachterbekeM.KellerJ.SaroglouV. (2012). Flexibility in existential beliefs and worldviews: Introducing and measuring existential quest. Journal of Individual Differences, 33(1), 2–16. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1614-0001/a000056
69.
VoasD. (2007). Surveys of behavior, beliefs and affiliation: Micro-quantitative. In BeckfordJ. A.DemerathN. J. III (Eds.), The Sage handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 144–166). Sage.
WinkP.DillonM.PrettymanA. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and authoritarianism: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00361.x
72.
WolfE. J.HarringtonK. M.ClarkS. L.MillerM. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164413495237
73.
ZinnbauerB. J.PargamentK. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 21–42). Guilford.
