This research tests the idea that a salient global identity positively affects people’s willingness to pay for environmentally friendly products. Results from a large-scale multi-nation survey (N = 75,934) as well as two studies (N = 322) conducted in Singapore supported this prediction. We found that participants with a more (vs. less) dominant global identity indicated greater support for environmentally friendly products and exhibited increased pro-environmental behavior. We further show that the effect is driven by a stronger feeling of personal responsibility toward the environment among individuals who possess a dominant global identity. Findings from this research suggest that the formation of stronger global identity, a psychological consequence of increasing globalization, can have an important impact on people’s pro-environmental behavior.
AldenD. L.SteenkampJ. B. E.BatraR. (2006). Consumer attitudes toward marketplace globalization: Structure, antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 227-239.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57, 774-783.
3.
ArnettJ. L. (2003). Coming of age in a multicultural world: Globalization and adolescent cultural identity formation. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 189-196.
4.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78.
5.
BartelsJ.ReindersM. J. (2010). Social identification, social representations, and consumer innovativeness in an organic food context: A cross-national comparison. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 347-352.
6.
BartschF.RieflerP.DiamantopoulosA. (2016). A taxonomy and review of positive consumer dispositions toward foreign countries and globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 24, 82-110.
7.
BergerI. E. (1997). The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 29, 515-531.
8.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
9.
BrittT. W. (1999). Engaging the self in the field: Testing the triangle model of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 696-706.
10.
BuchanN. R.BrewerM. B.GrimaldaG.WilsonR. K.FatasE.FoddyM. (2011). Global social identity and global cooperation. Psychological Science, 22, 821-828.
11.
ChenH.NgS.RaoA. R. (2005). Cultural differences in consumer impatience. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 291-301.
12.
ChenS. X.LamB. C.HuiB. P.NgJ. C.MakW. W.GuanY.. . . LauV. C. (2016). Conceptualizing psychological processes in response to globalization: Components, antecedents, and consequences of global orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 302-331.
13.
ChiuC.-Y.GriesP.TorelliC. J.ChengS. Y. (2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 663-676.
14.
ChiuC.-Y.KwanL. Y. Y. (2016). Globalization and psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 44-48.
15.
ChiuC.-Y.MallorieL.KehH. T.LawW. (2009). Perceptions of culture in multicultural space: Joint presentation of images from two cultures increases in-group attribution of culture-typical characteristics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 282-300.
16.
ChristopherA. N.SchlenkerB. R. (2005). The protestant work ethic and attributions of responsibility: Applications of the triangle model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1502-1518.
17.
EllisP. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FieldingK. S.HornseyM. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 121.
19.
FinchamF. D.JaspersJ. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 81-138.
20.
FuJ. H.-Y.ChiuC.-Y. (2007). Local culture’s responses to globalization — Exemplary persons and their attendant values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 636-653.
21.
GaoH.ZhangY.MittalV. (2017). How does local–global identity affect price sensitivity?Journal of Marketing, 81, 62-79.
22.
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141-157.
23.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 553-561.
24.
GrinsteinA.RieflerP. (2015). Citizens of the (green) world? Cosmopolitan orientation and sustainability. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 694-714.
25.
HamamuraT. (2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism–collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 3-24.
26.
HanssonB. (2003). Individual and structural determinants of environmental practice. London, England: Routledge.
27.
HarushR.LisakA.ErezM. (2016). Extending the global acculturation model to untangle the culture mixing puzzle. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1395-1408.
28.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
29.
HoltonR. (2000). Globalization’s cultural consequences. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 570, 140-152.
30.
HongY. Y.MorrisM. W.ChiuC.-Y.Benet-MartinezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.
31.
HowardJ. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367-393.
32.
HsuA.EmersonJ.LevyM.de SherbininA.JohnsonL.MalikO.. . . JaitehM. (2014). The 2014 environmental performance index [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.epi.yale.edu
33.
KashimaY. (2016). Culture and psychology in the 21st century: Conceptions of culture and person for psychology revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 4-20.
34.
LarocheM.BergeronJ.Barbaro-ForleoG. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally-friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 503-520.
35.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815-852.
36.
LeeJ. A.HoldenS. J. S. (1999). Understanding the determinants of environmentally conscious behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 16, 373-392.
37.
LeungA. K. Y.KohK.TamK. P. (2015). Being environmentally responsible: Cosmopolitan orientation predicts pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 79-94.
38.
LeungA. K. Y.QiuL.ChiuC. Y. (2014). The psychological science of globalization. In HongY.-Y.Benet-MartinezV. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural identity: Basic and applied perspectives (pp. 181-201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
40.
NgS.BatraR. (2017). Regulatory goals in a globalized world. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 270-277.
41.
O’BrienK. L.LeichenkoR. M. (2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10, 221-232.
42.
OysermanD. (2009). Identity-based motivation and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 276-279.
43.
PickowiczP. G. (1991). The theme of spiritual pollution in Chinese films of 1930s. Modern China, 17, 38-75.
44.
PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD. (2014). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-117 [Software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
45.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160-164.
46.
SantosH. C.VarnumM. E.GrossmannI. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1228-1239.
47.
SatterthwaiteD. (2009). The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change. Environment and Urbanization, 21, 545-567.
48.
SchlegelA. (2001). The global spread of adolescent culture. In CrockettL. J.SilbereisenR. K. (Eds.), Negotiating adolescence in times of social change (pp. 71-88). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
SchlenkerB. R.BrittT. W.PenningtonJ.MurphyR.DohertyK. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632-652.
50.
SrivastavaS. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 53-80.
51.
SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841-856.
52.
SteenkampJ. B. E.De JongM. G. (2010). A global investigation into the constellation of consumer attitudes toward global and local products. Journal of Marketing, 74, 18-40.
53.
StrizhakovaY.CoulterR. A. (2013). The “green” side of materialism in emerging BRIC and developed markets: The moderating role of global cultural identity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 69-82.
54.
StrizhakovaY.CoulterR. A.PriceL. L. (2012). The young adult cohort in emerging markets: Assessing their glocal cultural identity in a global marketplace. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 43-54.
55.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 5, 7-24.
56.
ThogersenJ. (2005). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles?Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 143-178.
57.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism:. Boulder, CO: Westview.
58.
TuL.KhareA.ZhangY. (2012). A short 8-item scale for measuring consumers’ local–global identity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 35-42.
59.
VörösmartyC. J.GreenP.SalisburyJ.LammersR. B. (2000). Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289, 284-288.
60.
WagnerJ. A.III. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-173.
61.
WeldonE.MustariE. L. (1988). Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 330-351.
62.
WoodhouseC. A. (2001). A tree-ring reconstruction of streamflow for the Colorado Front Range 1. JAWRA: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37, 561-569.
ZhangY.KhareA. (2009). The impact of accessible identities on the evaluation of global versus local products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 524-537.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
