Cultural identity has become increasingly important and complex within many contemporary globalized societies. Consequently, methodological development is needed to expand our conceptualization and measurement of (a) the formation and experiences of multiple nested cultural identities and (b) how such identities relate to psychosocial functioning. In the preregistered and experimental quantitative phase (Study 1), Danish participants (n = 308) were divided into three subsamples completely at random and exposed to various priming regarding global events (i.e., COVID-19, war in Ukraine, or a control prompt not related to current events). Danish, European, and global cultural identities were all highly endorsed across our sample, and global identity was enhanced by priming related to the war in Ukraine as compared with the other two priming conditions. Danish cultural identity was positively associated with well-being (self-esteem and life satisfaction) both directly and indirectly through self-concept clarity, whereas European identity was negatively associated with self-concept clarity, and global identity was positively associated with self-esteem. In the qualitative phase (Study 2), with a selected subsample of the Study 1 sample (n = 5), we conducted in-depth semistructured interviews to explore the experience of sociohistorically embedded cultural identities (i.e., shaped by a complex interplay of culture, language, and social practices) within the globalized context of Denmark. Results highlight ideographic understandings of cultural identities and how these identities are politically embedded and shaped through intercultural experiences and events. These results are discussed in terms of how multi-method approaches can enhance our understanding of contemporary complex cultural identities.
ArnettJ. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57(10), 774–783.
2.
BaumanZ. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
3.
BaumeisterR. F. (1997). Identity, self-concept, and self-esteem: The self lost and found. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A.BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 681–710). Academic Press.
BourhisR. Y.MoïseL. C.PerreaultS.SenécalS. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32(6), 369–386.
7.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Blackwell Science.
8.
CampbellJ. D.TrapnellP. D.HeineS. J.KatzI. M.LavalleeL. F.LehmanD. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141–156.
9.
CausadiasJ. M.VitriolJ. A.AtkinA. L. (2018). Do we overemphasize the role of culture in the behavior of racial/ethnic minorities? Evidence of a cultural (mis)attribution bias in American psychology. American Psychologist, 73(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000099
10.
ChengS. Y. Y.ChaoM. M.KwongJ.PengS.ChenX.KashimaY.ChiuC. (2010). The good old days and a better tomorrow: Historical representations and future imaginations of China during the 2008 Olympic games. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01307.x
CôtéJ. E.LevineC. G. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
CoverR. (2021). Identity in the disrupted time of COVID-19: Performativity, crisis, mobility and ethics. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100175.
15.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
16.
DoucerainM. M. (2019). Moving forward in acculturation research by integrating insights from cultural psychology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 73, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.07.010
17.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
19.
FriedmanJ. (1994). Cultural identity and global process. Sage.
20.
GamsakhurdiaV. (2020). Semiotic construction of the self in multicultural societies: A theory of proculturation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429201240
21.
GrantF.HoggM. A. (2012). Self-uncertainty, social identity prominence and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.006
22.
GygliS.HaelgF.PotrafkeN.SturmJ-E. (2019): The KOF Globalisation Index – Revisited, Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543–574 external page https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2c
HeldD.McGrewA. G. (2007). Globalization/anti-globalization: Beyond the great divide. Polity.
25.
HermansH. J. M.KonopkaA.OosterwegelA.ZomerP. (2017). Fields of tension in a boundary-crossing world: Towards a democratic organization of the self. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 505–535.
26.
HoggM. A. (2021). Uncertain self in a changing world: A foundation for radicalisation, populism, and autocratic leadership. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 235–268.
27.
HollidayA. (2010). Complexity in cultural identity. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10(2), 165–177.
28.
JensenL. A. (2003). Coming of age in a multicultural world: Globalization and adolescent cultural identity formation. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_10
29.
JensenL. A.ArnettJ. J.McKenzieJ. (2011). Globalization and cultural identity. In SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 285–301). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_13
30.
JettenJ.HaslamC.AlexanderS. H. (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology Press.
31.
JørgensenC. R. (2008). Identitet: Psykologiske og kulturanalytiske perspektiver. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
32.
KaraszA.SingelisT. M. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods research in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(6), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109349172
33.
KimY. Y. (2015). Finding a “home” beyond culture: The emergence of intercultural personhood in the globalizing world. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 46, 3–12.
34.
KjærA. L.PalsbroL. (2008). National identity and law in the context of European integration: The case of Denmark. Discourse & Society, 19(5), 599–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508092245
35.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
36.
KunstJ. R.LefringhausenK.SamD. L.BerryJ. W.DovidioJ. F. (2021). The missing side of acculturation: How majority-group members relate to immigrant and minority-group cultures. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(6), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211040771
McFarlandS.HackettJ.HamerK.Katzarska-MillerI.MalschA.ReeseG.ReysenS. (2019). Global human identification and citizenship: A review of psychological studies. Political Psychology, 40, 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12572
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.).
41.
OzerS.BertelsenP.SinglaR.SchwartzS. J. (2017). Grab your culture and walk with the global: Ladakhi students’ negotiation of cultural identity in the context of globalization-based acculturation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116687394
42.
OzerS.KunstJ. R.SchwartzS. J. (2021). Investigating direct and indirect globalization-based acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 84, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.07.012
43.
PietkiewiczI.SmithJ. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20, 7–14.
44.
RiisH. B. (2017). It doesn’t matter if you’re Black or White: Negotiating identity and Danishness in intercultural dialogue meetings. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 38(6), 694–707.
RudminF. W.AhmadzadehV. (2001). Psychometric critique of acculturation psychology: The case of Iranian migrants in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 41–56.
47.
SamD. L.BerryJ. W. (2010). Acculturation: When individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 472–481.
48.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
49.
SchwartzS. J.ZamboangaB. L.WeisskirchR. S. (2008). Broadening the study of the self: Integrating the study of personal identity and cultural identity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 635–651.
SmithJ. A.OsbornM. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage.
52.
TomlinsonJ. (1999). Globalization and culture. Polity.
53.
UsborneE.TaylorD. M. (2010). The role of cultural identity clarity for self-concept clarity, self-esteem, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210372215
54.
ValsinerJ. (2017). Methodology in the new key: The methodology cycle. In ValsinerJ. (Ed.), From methodology to methods in human psychology (pp. 21–30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61064-1_3
55.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.WardC. (2013). Fading majority cultures: The implications of transnationalism and demographic changes for immigrant acculturation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 81–97.
56.
VisintinE. P.GreenE. G. T.SarrasinO. (2018). Inclusive normative climates strengthen the relationship between identification with Europe and tolerant immigration attitudes: Evidence from 22 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(6), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117731092
57.
WardC.Ng Tseung-WongC.SzaboA.QumseyaT.BhowonU. (2018). Hybrid and alternating identity styles as strategies for managing multicultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(9), 1402–1439.
58.
YoshikawaH.WeisnerT. S.KalilA.WayN. (2013). Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: Uses and methodological choices. Qualitative Psychology, 1(S), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/2326-3598.1.S.3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
