Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-6
Stereotype Threat and Stereotype Reactance: The Effect of Direct and Indirect Stereotype Manipulations on Performance of Palestinian Citizens of Israel on Achievement Tests
The role of stereotype threat in performance of Palestinian citizens of Israel (PCI) on the psychometric exam (parallel to the SAT in the United States) was investigated. Two experiments, conducted in field settings, examined the role of stereotype threat in performance of PCI students in psychometric-like tests. Experiment 1, conducted on 135 Arab high school students, indicated that activation of the stereotype pertaining to the lower academic ability of PCI lowered participants’ performance relative to a control group. Experiment 2, which included 115 Arab students who participated in preparatory courses for the psychometric tests, showed that a direct manipulation of the stereotype led to stereotype reactance and increased performance, whereas an indirect manipulation activated the stereotype and resulted in lowered performance. These findings suggest that activating a stereotype threat or a stereotype reactance is contingent on the manipulation employed. Practical implications of these results are discussed.
Abu-SaadI. (2004). Separate and unequal: The consequences of racism and discrimination against Palestinian Arabs in the educational system in Israel. Social Identities, 10, 101-127.
2.
Al-HajM. (1995). Education, empowerment, and control: The case of the Arabs in Israel. Albany: State University of New York.
3.
AronsonJ.FriedC. B.GoodC. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125.
4.
AronsonJ.LustinaM. J.GoodC.KeoughK.SteeleC. M.BrownJ. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29-46.
5.
AronsonJ.QuinnD. M.SpencerS. J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In SwinJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 83-103). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
Bar-TalD.TeichmanY. (2005). Representation of Arabs in public discourse. In Bar-TalD.TeichmanY. (Eds.), Stereotypes and prejudice in conflict: Representations of Arabs in Israeli Jewish society (pp. 125-156). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BeilockS. L.RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 256-276.
8.
BenzimanU.MansoorA. (1992). Diare Meshne: Haa’ravim ha Yesraelim [Secondary inhabitants: The Israeli Arabs]. Jerusalem, Israel: Keter Publishing House.
9.
BhaweN. M.GuptaV. K.TurbanD. B. (2008). The effect of gender stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1053-1061.
10.
BizmanA.AmirY. (1982). Mutual perceptions of Arabs and Jews in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 461-469.
11.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
BrownR. P.JosephsR. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 246-257.
13.
CadinuM.MaassA.RosabiancaA.KiesnerJ. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16, 572-578.
14.
CooleyE.PayneB. K.LoerschC.LeiR. (2015). Who owns implicit attitudes? Testing a metacognitive perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 103-115.
15.
CroizetJ. C.DesprésG.GauzinsM. E.HuguetP.LeyensJ. P.MéotA. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 721-731.
16.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276-287.
17.
DoyleR.VoyerD. (2016). Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 103-116.
18.
DuntonB. C.FazioR. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316-326.
19.
DwairyM. (2004). Culturally sensitive education: Adapting self-oriented assertiveness training to collective minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 423-436.
20.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
21.
Golan-AgnonD. A. (2006). Separate but not equal: Discrimination against Palestinian Arab students in Israel. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1075-1084.
22.
GonzalesP. M.BlantonH.WilliamsK. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659-670.
23.
HessT. M.HinsonJ. T.StathamJ. A. (2004). Explicit and implicit stereotype activation effects on memory: Do age and awareness moderate the impact of priming?Psychology and Aging, 19, 495-505.
24.
HigginsE. T.RholesW. S.JonesC. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
25.
HofmanM. E. (1970). The meaning of being a Jew in Israel: An analysis of ethnic identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 196-202.
26.
InzlichtM.AronsonJ.GoodC.McKayL. (2006). A particular resiliency to threatening environments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 323-336.
27.
InzlichtM.Ben-ZeevT. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
28.
InzlichtM.Ben-ZeevT. (2003). Do high-achieving female students underperform in private? The implications of threatening environments on intellectual processing. Journal of Education Psychology, 95, 796-805.
29.
InzlichtM.McKayL.AronsonJ. (2006). Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17, 262-269.
30.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Statistical abstract of Israel 2010. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader
31.
JabareenY. (2006). Law and education: The case of Palestinian Arab education in Israel. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1052-1074.
32.
JohnsM.SchmaderT.MartensA. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175-179.
33.
KellerJ. (2007). Stereotype threat in classroom settings: The interactive effect of domain identification, task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students’ maths performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 323-338.
34.
KellerJ.DauenheimerD. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371-381.
35.
KellowJ. T.JonesB. D. (2008). The effects of stereotypes on the achievement gap: Reexamining the academic performance of African American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 34, 94-120.
36.
KrayL. J.RebJ.GalinskyA. D.ThompsonL. (2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 399-411.
37.
KrayL. J.ThompsonL.GalinskyA. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942-958.
38.
Mar’iS. (1978). Arab education in Israel. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
39.
McIntyreR. B.PaulsonR. M.LordC. G. (2003). Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 83-90.
40.
MironA. M.BrehmJ. W. (2006). Reactance theory—40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37(1), 9-18.
41.
MoskowitzG. B.SkurnikI. W. (1999). Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplar primes initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 911-927.
42.
NadlerJ. T.ClarkM. H. (2011). Stereotype threat: A meta-analysis comparing African Americans to Hispanic Americans1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 872-890.
43.
NasserF.BirenbaumM. (2005). Modeling mathematics achievement of Jewish and Arab eighth graders in Israel: The effects of learner-related variables. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 277-302.
44.
NguyenH. H. D.RyanA. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314.
45.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In PettyR. E.FazioR. H.BrinolP. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
PennebakerJ. W.SandersD. Y. (1976). American graffiti: Effects of authority and reactance arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 264-267.
47.
PenningtonC. R.HeimD.LevyA. R.LarkinD. T. (2016). Twenty years of stereotype threat research: A review of psychological mediators. PLoS ONE, 11(1), Article e0146487. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146487
48.
QuinnD. M.SpencerS. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women’s generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 55-71.
49.
ReiterY. (1996). The civil status of the Arabs in Israel in an era of peace. Raa’nana: The Institute for Israeli Arab Studies-Beit Berl. [In Hebrew]
50.
RosenthalH. E. S.CrispR. J. (2006). Reducing stereotype threat by blurring intergroup boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 501-511.
51.
RydellR. J.Van LooK. J.BoucherK. L. (2014). Which executive functions are impaired by stereotype threat and account for different threat-related outcomes?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 377-390.
52.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336-356.
53.
SchusterC.MartinyS. E.SchmaderT. (2015). Distracted by the unthought—Suppression and reappraisal of mind wandering under stereotype threat. PLoS ONE, 10(3), Article e0122207. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122207
54.
Sikkuy Association. (June, 2002). The report of the Sikkuy Association, 2001–2002. Tamra, Israel: Author.
55.
SmithJ. L.WhiteP. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It’s not just a woman’s issue. Sex Roles, 47, 179-191.
56.
SmoohaS. (2001). Arab-Jewish relations in Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. In Ya’arE.ShavitZ. (Eds.), Trends in Israeli society (pp. 231-364). Tel Aviv, Israel: Open University. [In Hebrew]
57.
SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M.QuinnD. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
58.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
59.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of Stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440.
60.
StoneJ. (2002). Battling doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1667-1678.
61.
StoneJ.McWhinnieC. (2008). Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 445-452.
62.
ZeidnerM. (1990). Perceptions of ethnic group modal intelligence: Reflections of cultural stereotypes or intelligence test scores. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 214-231.
