Individuals’ lives depend heavily on their freedom, which is why they may respond with reactance if freedom is threatened. Our research, which spans four studies with 1,486 Chinese students as participants, from the perspective of psychological reactance theory, provides evidence that positive gender stereotypes can provoke targets’ negative reactions. In Study 1, participants who heard a speaker state a positive gender stereotype (e.g., “women are beautiful” and “men are strong”) disliked the speaker more, believed that the speaker was more gender prejudiced, and experienced stronger negative emotions than those who heard no stereotype. In Studies 2−4, freedom threat was a crucial mediator in the relation between the positive gender stereotype and targets’ negative reactions. Furthermore, depersonalization also played a parallel mediating role. Although positive gender stereotypes seem superficially complimentary, they may have detrimental effects on interpersonal relations. Our research suggests that people should refrain from using stereotypes in their interpersonal interactions whenever possible. Even though people may sometimes inevitably convey positive stereotypes to others, they should be given the freedom to minimize the negative consequences of such stereotypes. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/DOI: 10.1177/03616843241242711
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2018). Agency and communion in social psychology. Routledge.
2.
AllenM. S.IliescuD.GreiffS. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699
3.
AltN. P.ChaneyK. E.ShihM. J. (2019). But that was meant to be a compliment!”: Evaluative costs of confronting positive racial stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218756493
4.
BaoH. W.CaiH.JingY.WangJ. (2021). Novel evidence for the increasing prevalence of unique names in China: A reply to Ogihara. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731244
5.
BessarabovaE.FinkE. L.TurnerM. (2013). Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: Comparative statics. Human Communication Research, 39(3), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12007
6.
BlairI. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
7.
BodenhausenG. V.KramerG. P.SüsserK. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621
8.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
9.
BrehmJ. W.BrehmS. S. (1981). Psychological reactance—A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
10.
CaiH.HuangZ.JingY. (2019). Living in a changing world: The change of culture and psychology. In MatsumotoD.HwangH. C. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1070–1116). Oxford University Press.
11.
CheryanS.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11(5), 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00277
12.
CheryanS.MarkusH. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209
13.
CuddyA. J.WolfE. B.GlickP.CrottyS.ChongJ.NortonM. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 622–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000027
14.
CzoppA. M. (2008). When is a compliment not a compliment? Evaluating expressions of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.007
15.
CzoppA. M.KayA. C.CheryanS. (2015). Positive stereotypes are pervasive and powerful. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615588091
16.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001
17.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
18.
DownsD. M.CowanG. (2012). Predicting the importance of freedom of speech and the perceived harm of hate speech. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 1353–1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00902.x
19.
EaglyA. H.KoenigA. M. (2021). The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211013775
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
22.
FeldmanG. (2017). Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12293. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12293
23.
GeorgeacO. A. M.RattanA. (2023). The business case for diversity backfires: Detrimental effects of organizations’ instrumental diversity rhetoric for underrepresented group members’ sense of belonging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 69–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000394
24.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
25.
GraupmannV. (2018). Show me what threatens you, and I can tell who you are: Perception of threat and the self. Self and Identity, 17(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1412346
26.
GraupmannV.JonasE.MeierE.HawelkaS.AichhornM. (2012). Reactance, the self, and its group: When threats to freedom come from the ingroup versus the outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.857
27.
HakimC.KurmanJ.EshelY. (2017). Stereotype threat and stereotype reactance: The effect of direct and indirect stereotype manipulations on performance of Palestinian citizens of Israel on achievement tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(5), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117698040
28.
HamamuraT.XuY. (2015). Changes in Chinese culture as examined through changes in personal pronoun usage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(7), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115592968
29.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
30.
HofstedeG. (2011). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.
31.
HydeJ. S.BiglerR. S.JoelD.TateC. C.van AndersS. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307
32.
JiL.-J.LeeA.ZhangZ.LiY.WangX.-Q.TorokD.RosenbaumS. (2023). Judging a book by its cover: Cultural differences in inference of the inner state based on the outward appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000413
33.
JonasE.GraupmannV.KayserD. N.ZannaM.Traut-MattauschE.FreyD. (2009). Culture, self, and the emergence of reactance: Is there a “universal” freedom?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.005
34.
KayA. C.DayM. V.ZannaM. P.NussbaumA. D. (2013). The insidious (and ironic) effects of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.003
35.
KimY.BaekT. H.YoonS.OhS.ChoiY. K. (2017). Assertive environmental advertising and reactance: Differences between South Koreans and Americans. Journal of Advertising, 46(4), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1361878
36.
KrayL. J.RebJ.GalinskyA. D.ThompsonL. (2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261884
37.
KrayL. J.ThompsonL.GalinskyA. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942
38.
LeeE. J. (2006). When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication?Communication Research, 33(6), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206293248
39.
LiJ.McLellanR. (2021). Is language learning a feminine domain? Examining the content and stereotype threat effect of female-language stereotypes among EFL learners in China. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101991
40.
LovakovA.AgadullinaE. R. (2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752
41.
LynnM.SnyderC. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395–410). Oxford University Press.
42.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
43.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
44.
MillerC. H.LaneL. T.DeatrickL. M.YoungA. M.PottsK. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x
45.
MühlbergerC.JonasE. (2019). Reactance theory. In SassenbergK.VliekM. L. W. (Eds.), Social psychology in action. Evidence-based interventions from theory to practice (79–94). Springer.
46.
NgA. H.KermaniM. S.LalondeR. N. (2021). Cultural differences in psychological reactance: Responding to social media censorship. Current Psychology, 40, 2804–2813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00213-0
47.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
48.
ProudfootD.KayA. C. (2023). Communal expectations conflict with autonomy motives: The western drive for autonomy shapes women’s negative responses to positive gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000311
49.
RamasubramanianS.WinfieldA.RiewestahlE. (2020). Positive stereotypes and counter-stereotypes: Examining their effects on prejudice reduction and favorable intergroup relations. In BillingsA.ParrottS. (Eds.), Media stereotypes: From ageism to xenophobia (pp. 257–276). Peter Lang Publishers.
50.
RosenbergB. D.SiegelJ. T. (2018). A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Science, 4(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091
51.
RosenbergB. D.SiegelJ. T. (2020). Reactance and spiritual possibilities: An application of psychological reactance theory. In VailK. E.IIIRoutledgeC. (Eds.), The science of religion, spirituality, and existentialism (pp. 67–82). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817204-9.00006-8
52.
RuiJ. R.ChenJ.WangL.XuP. (2023). Freedom as right or privilege? Comparing the effect of power distance on psychological reactance between China and the United States. Health Communication, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2212138
53.
SczesnyS.NaterC.EaglyA. H. (2018). Agency and communion: Their implications for gender stereotypes and gender identities. In AbeleA.WojciszkeB. (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 103–116). Routledge.
54.
ShihM.PittinskyT. L.AmbadyN. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10(1), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00111
55.
ShihM.PittinskyT. L.TrahanA. (2006). Domain-specific effects of stereotypes on performance. Self and Identity, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860500338534
56.
SiyJ. O.CheryanS. (2013). When compliments fail to flatter: American individualism and responses to positive stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030183
57.
SiyJ. O.CheryanS. (2016). Prejudice masquerading as praise: The negative echo of positive stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649605
58.
SongJ.LiJ.LiuY.RuanY. (2021). The attitude of work-oriented and family-oriented Chinese women toward the evaluations based on the traditional positive stereotype that women are virtuous. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 653234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653234
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
61.
StanleyM. L.ShepherdS.KayA. C. (2023). Heroization and ironic funneling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000336
62.
TanT. X.LiuY.LiG.YiZ. (2022). Independent and interdependent self-construal and anxiety in Chinese college students: A path analysis. Journal of College and Character, 23(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587X.2022.2053291
63.
VignolesV. L.OweE.BeckerM.SmithP. B.EasterbrookM. J.BrownR.GonzálezR.DidierN.CarrascoD.CadenaM. P.LayS.SchwartzS. J.Des RosiersS. E.VillamarJ. A.GavreliucA.ZinkengM.KreuzbauerR.BagumaP.MartinM., . . . & BondM. H. (2016). Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000175
64.
WangZ.GuanJ.ZhaoL. (2022). Priming science identity elicits stereotype boost for Chinese science female students: Evidence from math performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 44(3–6), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2022.2144315
65.
WangZ.ZhaoL.GuanJ.ZuoG. (2023). The negative effects of positive gender stereotypes: Evidence from a collectivistic cultural context. Sex Roles, 89(11), 786–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01413-6
WengL.ZhangY. B.KulichS. J.ZuoC. (2021). Cultural values in Chinese proverbs reported by Chinese college students. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12415
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
