Previous research showed that the stability of value structures across cultures is influenced by both sample fluctuations and social context. This study tests the within-country stability of value structures in a large sample of physicians (N = 13,414) across all states in Brazil. The authors use a new value instrument that differentiates values according to their theoretical functions (type of orientation: personal versus social; type of motivation: materialistic versus humanitarian). Although the proposed structure of the value functions was relatively robust, systematic fluctuations in structure emerged. In line with previous research, the authors found strong effects of sampling fluctuations as well as socioeconomic development indices on the stability overall. Examining the differential effect of various social indicators, social living conditions were found to mediate the effect of socioeconomic indicators on value stability along the first dimension contrasting personal versus social value orientations. The second dimension differentiating materialistic versus humanitarian values is less stable. Implications for value theory and research, in particular for cross- and intra-cultural research, are discussed.
Baumeister, R.F. ( 2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning and social life. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Boer, D., & Fischer, R. ( 2008). Relationship between different value instruments and music functions across cultures. Manuscript in preparation , Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
3.
Borg, I., & Groenen, P. ( 1997). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications . New York: Springer.
4.
Braithwaite, V.A., Makkai, T., & Pittelkow, Y. ( 1996). Inglehart’s materialism-postmaterialism concept: Clarifying the dimensionality debate through Rokeach’s model of social values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1536-1555.
5.
Buss, D.M. ( 1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind . Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Carneiro, M.B., & Gouveia, V.V. ( 2004). O médico e o seu trabalho [The physician and his/her work]. Brasília, Brazil: Conselho Federal de Medicina.
8.
Dahl, E., Elstad, J.I., Hofoss, D., & Martin-Mollard, M. (2006). For whom is income inequality most harmful? A multi-level analysis of income inequality and mortality in Norway. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 2562-2574.
9.
Fischer, R., Vauclair, M.C., Fontaine, J.R., & Schwartz, S.H. (2010) Are individual- and culture-level value structures different? Testing Hofstede’s legacy with the Schwartz data.
10.
Fone, D., Dunstan, F., Williams, G., Lloyd, K., & Palmer, S. ( 2007). Places, people and mental health: A multilevel analysis of economic inactivity. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 633-645.
11.
Fontaine, J.R.J. ( 1999). Culturele vertekening in Schwartz’ waardeninstrument: Een exemplarische onderzoek naar culturele vertekening in sociaal-psychologische en persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten [Cultural bias in Schwartz’s value instrument: An exemplary study into cultural bias in social-psychological and personality questionnaires]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
12.
Fontaine, J.J.R., & Fischer, R. (in press). Multilevel structural equivalence. In D. Matsumoto & F. van de Vijver (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural research methods. New York : Oxford University Press.
13.
Fontaine, J.R.J., Poortinga, Y.H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S.H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: Distinguishing sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 39, 345-365.
14.
Georgas, J., & Berry, J.W. ( 1995). An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology . Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 121-157.
15.
Georgas, J., van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Berry, J.W. ( 2004). The ecocultural framework, ecosocial indices, and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 74-96.
16.
Gouveia, V.V. ( 1998). La naturaleza de los valores descriptores del individualismo y del colectivismo: Una comparación intra e intercultural [The nature of individualist and collectivist values: A within and between cultures comparison] . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.
17.
Gouveia, V.V. ( 2003). A natureza motivacional dos valores humanos: Evidências acerca de uma nova tipologia [The motivational nature of human values: Evidences of a new typology]. Estudos de Psicologia, 8, 431-443.
18.
Gouveia, V.V., Albuquerque, F.J.B., Clemente, M., & Espinosa, P. ( 2002). Human values and social identities: A study in two collectivist cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 333-342.
19.
Gouveia, V.V., Andrade, J.M., Milfont, T.L., Queiroga, F., & Santos, W.S. ( 2003). Dimensões normativas do individualismo e coletivismo: É suficiente a dicotomia pessoal vs. social? [Normative dimensions of the individualism and collectivism: Is the dichotomy personal vs. social sufficient?]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica , 16, 223-234.
20.
Gouveia, V.V., Clemente, M., & Espinosa, P. ( 2003). The horizontal and vertical attributes of individualism and collectivism in a Spanish Population. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 43-61.
21.
Gouveia, V.V., Milfont, T.L., Fischer, R., & Santos, W.S. ( 2008). Teoria funcionalista dos valores humanos [Functionalist theory of human values]. In M. L. M. Teixeira (Ed.). Valores humanos e gestão: Novas perspectivas (pp. 47-80). São Paulo, Brazil: Senac.
22.
Gouveia, V.V., Milfont, T.L., Fischer, R., & Schultz, P.W. ( 2007, July). A functional theory of human values: Testing its adequacy in fourteen Iberoamerican cultures. Paper presented at the 31st Interamerican Congress of Psychology, Mexico City, Mexico.
23.
Gouveia, V.V., Santos, W.S., Milfont, T.L., Fischer, R., Clemente, M., & Espinosa, P. ( 2010). Teoría funcionalista de los valores humanos en España: Comprobación de las hipótesis de contenido y estructura (Functionalist theory of human values in Spain: Testing the content and strucure hypotheses). Revista Interamericana de Psicologia , 44, 203-214.
24.
Hofstede, G. ( 2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J.A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
26.
IBGE, Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. ( 2003). Síntese de indicadores sociais 2002 [2002 summary of social indicators]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.
27.
IBGE, Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. ( 2007). Países: Síntese do Brasil [Countries: Summary of Brazil]. Retrieved February 4, 2008, from http://www.ibge.gov.br/paisesat/main.php.
28.
Inglehart, R. ( 1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Inglehart, R. ( 1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & Ç. Kağitçibaşi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 3. Social behavior and applications (2nd ed., pp. 1-49). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
Marks, G.N. ( 1997). The formation of materialist and postmaterialist values . Social Science Research, 26, 52-68.
32.
Maslow, A.H. ( 1954). Motivation and personality. New York : Harper & Row.
33.
Mueller, D.J., & Wornhoff, S.A. (1990). Distinguishing social and personal values. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 50, 691-699.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses . Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
36.
Pinker, S. ( 1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
37.
PNUD, United Nations Development Programme. ( 2000). Atlas do desenvolvimento humano do Brasil [Atlas of Brazil human development]. Retrieved February 4, 2008, from http://www.pnud.org.br/atlas/
38.
Pochmann, M., & Amorim, R.G. ( 2003). Atlas da exclusão social no Brasil [Atlas of social exclusion in Brazil]. São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez Editora.
39.
RIPSA, Rede Interagencial de Informações para a Saúde. (2002). Indicadores básicos para a saúde no Brasil: Conceitos e aplicações [Basic health indicators of Brazil: Concepts and applications]. Brasília, Brazil: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde.
40.
Rokeach, M. ( 1973). The nature of human values. New York : Free Press.
41.
Ronen, S. ( 1994). An underlying structure of motivational need taxionomies: A cross-cultural confirmation. In H. C. Triandis , M. D. Dunnette, & I. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 241-269). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
42.
Schwartz, S.H. ( 1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
43.
Schwartz, S.H. ( 2006). Basic human values: Theory, measurement and applications . Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 249-288.
44.
Schwartz, S.H., & Bilsky, W. ( 1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
45.
Schwartz, S.H., & Boehnke, K. ( 2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230-255.
46.
Schwartz, S.H., & Sagiv, L. ( 1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92-116.
47.
Spini, D. ( 2004). Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz value survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 3-23.
48.
Tamayo, A. ( 1994). Hierarquia de valores transculturais e brasileiros [Hierarchy of cross-cultural and Brazilian values]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 10, 269-285.
49.
Tamayo, A., & Schwartz, S.H. (1993). Estrutura motivacional dos valores humanos [Motivational structure of human values]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 9, 329-348.
50.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. ( 1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375-424.
51.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. ( 1992). Psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). Relatório de desenvolvimento juvenil 2003 [2003 report on youth development]. Retrieved February 4, 2008, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001339/133976por.pdf
54.
van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Poortinga, Y.H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 33, 141-156.
55.
Vanhanen, T. ( 1990). The process of democratization: A comparative study of 147 states, 1980-1988. New York: Crane Russack.
56.
Welzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.D. (2003). The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research , 42, 341-379.
57.
Winkleby, M., Sundquist, K., & Cubbin, C. ( 2007). Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighbourhood deprivation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 97-106.
