This paper presents the first longitudinal examination of stability and change in the 19 values of Schwartz’s refined theory. A total of N = 465 high-school students (75% boys) participated in the study. The Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised was administered four times over three years in mid-to-late adolescence (ages 15–18). We investigated multiple types of stability. At the mean level, Power-Dominance and Universalism-Nature increased significantly in importance compared to the other values. By contrast, the relative importance of Benevolence, Stimulation, Hedonism, and Face decreased significantly. Correlations between the growth parameters of the 19 values showed that change occurred in a coherent and organized manner, mirroring the circular structure of Schwartz’s theory. A medium-to-high degree of rank-order consistency was observed over 3 years, with coefficients ranging from .30 (Self-Direction-Action) to .56 (Conformity-Rules). On average, overall and distinctive profile stabilities were .66 and .45, respectively. Whereas the hierarchical order of values was consistent over time for most adolescents, there were important interindividual differences in stability patterns. The results from this study are discussed and related to earlier findings on value change during adjacent developmental periods. Taken together, they contribute to drawing a roadmap of value development in late adolescence toward early adulthood.
Plain Language Summary
This paper presents the first examination of stability and change in the 19 values of Schwartz’s refined theory over three years in late adolescence (ages 15–18). A total of N = 465 high-school students (75% male) participated in the study. The Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised was administered four times, annually. We investigated multiple types of stability. On average, Self-direction-Thought, Power-Dominance, Security-Societal, and Universalism-Nature increased significantly in importance compared to the other values. By contrast, the relative importance of Benevolence, Stimulation, Hedonism, and Face decreased significantly. We observed a general tendency for motivationally compatible values to change in the same direction and for those expressing conflicting motivations to change in opposite directions. Differences between persons in the importance assigned to values are moderately stable over the 3 years of the study. The relative importance of values within an individual (i.e., the individual’s value hierarchy) tended to persist over time for most adolescents. However, the degree of stability may vary considerably among individuals. Results are discussed and related to earlier findings on value change during adjacent developmental periods. Taken together, they contribute to drawing a roadmap of value development in late adolescence toward early adulthood.
AthertonO. E.DonnellanM. B.RobinsR. W. (2020). Development of personality across the life span. In CorrP. J.MatthewsG. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 169–182). Cambridge University Press.
3.
BacchiniD.AffusoG.AquilarS.DragoneM.EspositoC. (2023). Values across adolescence: A four-year longitudinal study. The predictive role of community violence and parental acceptance-rejection. European Journal of Personality, 37(6), 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231167199
4.
BakerE. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, definition. In CockerhamW. C.DingwallR.QuahS. R. (Eds.), The wiley blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society (pp. 2210–2214). Wiley-Blackwell.
5.
BaltesP. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611
6.
BaumertA.SchmittM.PeruginiM.JohnsonW.BlumG.BorkenauP.CostantiniG.DenissenJ. J. A.FleesonW.GraftonB.JayawickremeE.KurziusE.MacLeodC.MillerL. C.ReadS. J.RobertsB.RobinsonM. D.WoodD.WrzusC. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115
7.
Benish-WeismanM. (2024). “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are”: The contribution of peers to adolescents’ values. Child Development Perspectives, 18(4), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12510
8.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society - Series B: Statistical Methodology, 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
9.
BerraM.CavalettoG. M. (2020). Overcoming the stem gender gap: From school to work. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupjijse-2020-2-1
10.
BilskyW.JanikM.SchwartzS. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values: Evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110362757
11.
BleidornW.SchwabaT.ZhengA.HopwoodC. J.SosaS. S.RobertsB. W.BrileyD. A. (2022). Personality stability and change: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 148(7–8), 588–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000365
12.
BorgI.GroenenP. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). Springer.
13.
ChanD. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 421–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814004
14.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
15.
CieciuchJ.DavidovE.AlgesheimerR. (2016). The stability and change of value structure and priorities in childhood: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 25(3), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12147
16.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J.MartinM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x
17.
CongerR. D.DoganS. J. (2007). Social class and socialization in families. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 433–460). The Guilford Press.
DanielE.Benish‐WeismanM. (2019). Value development during adolescence: Dimensions of change and stability. Journal of Personality, 87(3), 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12420
DanielE.MisgavK.ChomskyA. (2023). Middle childhood development in personal values. Journal of Personality, 92(5), 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12888
23.
DenissenJ. J. A.van AkenM. A. G.PenkeL.WoodD. (2013). Self-regulation underlies temperament and personality: An integrative developmental framework. Child Development Perspectives, 7(4), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12050
24.
DobewallH.AavikT. (2016). Rank-order consistency and profile stability of self- and informant-reports of personal values in comparison to personality traits. Journal of Individual Differences, 37(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000186
EnrightR. D.ShuklaD. G.LapsleyD. K. (1980). Adolescent egocentrism–sociocentrism and self-consciousness. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02087929
28.
FerrerE.BalluerkaN.WidamanK. F. (2008). Factorial invariance and the specification of second-order latent growth models. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral & Social Sciences, 4(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.1.22
29.
FrankenbergerK. D. (2000). Adolescent egocentrism: A comparison among adolescents and adults. Journal of Adolescence, 23(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2000.0319
30.
FurrR. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1267–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x
31.
GotliebR. J. M.YangX. F.Immordino-YangM. H. (2024). Diverse adolescents’ transcendent thinking predicts young adult psychosocial outcomes via brain network development. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 6254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56800-0
32.
HawleyP. H.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407074630
JonkmannK.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO. (2009). Social dominance in adolescence: The moderating role of the classroom context and behavioral heterogeneity. Child Development, 80(2), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01264.x
35.
KangY.McNeishD. M.HancockG. R. (2016). The role of measurement quality on practical guidelines for assessing measurement and structural invariance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(4), 533–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415603764
36.
KeijerM. G. (2021). Effects of social economic status and parenting values on adolescents’ expected field of study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00992-7
37.
KlimstraT. A.HaleW. W.RaaijmakersQ. A.BranjeS. J.MeeusW. H. (2009). Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014746
38.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
39.
KoskiJ. E.XieH.OlsonI. R. (2015). Understanding social hierarchies: The neural and psychological foundations of status perception. Social Neuroscience, 10(5), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1013223
MansteadA. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
McArdleJ. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural modeling of repeated measures data. In NesselroadeJ. R.CattellR. B. (Eds.), The handbook of multivariate psychology (2nd ed., pp. 561–614). Springer.
44.
MilfontT. L.MilojevP.SibleyC. G. (2016). Values stability and change in adulthood: A 3‐year longitudinal study of rank‐order stability and mean‐level differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216639245
MyyryL.JuujarviS.PessoK. (2013). Change in values and moral reasoning during higher education. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.757217
47.
PoortingaW.DemskiC.SteentjesK. (2023). Generational differences in climate-related beliefs, risk perceptions and emotions in the UK. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), 229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00870-x
48.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In RafteryA. E. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 111–164). Blackwell.
49.
RobertsB. W. (2006). Personality development and organizational behavior. In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research on organizational behavior (pp. 1–41). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
50.
RobertsB. W.DavisJ. P. (2016). Young adulthood is the crucible of personality development. Emerging Adulthood, 4(5), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696816653052
51.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3
52.
RobertsB. W.NickelL. B. (2021). Personality development across the life course: A neo-socioanalytic perspective. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4 ed., pp. 259–283). The Guilford Press.
53.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
54.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.CaspiA. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 375–398). The Guilford Press.
55.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.SmithJ. L. (2005). Evaluating five factor theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(1), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.002
56.
RoccasS.SagivL.NavonM. (2017). Methodological issues in studying personal values. In RoccasS.SagivL. (Eds.), Values and behavior: Taking a cross-cultural perspective (pp. 15–50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_2
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). Academic Press.
59.
SchwartzS. H. (2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In TamayoA.PortoJ. B. (Eds.), Values and behavior in organizations (pp. 56–95). Vozes.
60.
SchwartzS. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications. Revue Française de Sociologie, 42, 249–288. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.474.0929
61.
SchwartzS. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
62.
SchwartzS. H. (2016). Coding and analyzing PVQ-RR data (instructions for the revised Portrait Values Questionnaire). Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35393.56165
63.
SchwartzS. H. (2017). The refined theory of basic values. In RoccasS.SagivL. (Eds.), Values and behavior: Taking a cross-cultural perspective (pp. 51–72). Springer International Publishing.
64.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
65.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ. (2022). Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups: Psychometrics of the revised Portrait Value Questionnaire. Assessment, 29(5), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121998760
66.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.VecchioneM.DavidovE.FischerR.BeierleinC.RamosA.VerkasaloM.LönnqvistJ. E.DemirutkuK.Dirilen-GumusO.KontyM. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
67.
SchwartzS. H.RubelT. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
68.
SebastianC.BurnettS.BlakemoreS. J. (2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008
69.
SeifertI. S.RohrerJ. M.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2022). The development of the rank-order stability of the Big Five across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(5), 920–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000398
70.
SmallenbroekO.StanciuA. (2024). Age and gender differences in the value development of Dutch adults in 11 years of longitudinal data. Journal of Research in Personality, 113, Article 104540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104540
71.
SomervilleL. H.JonesR. M.CaseyB. J. (2010). A time of change: Behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.07.003
72.
SotoC. J. (2016). The little six personality dimensions from early childhood to early adulthood: Mean-level age and gender differences in parents’ reports. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12168
UzefovskyF.DöringA. K.Knafo-NoamA. (2016). Values in middle childhood: Social and genetic contributions. Social Development, 25(3), 482–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12155
77.
Van den AkkerA. L.DekovićM.AsscherJ.PrinzieP. (2014). Mean‐level personality development across childhood and adolescence: A temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037248
78.
VecchioneM.AlessandriG. (2017). Validation of the Italian version of the portrait values questionnaire-revised (PVQ-R). Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 44(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1421/86906
79.
VecchioneM.CapraraG.SchoenH.CastroJ. L. G.SchwartzS. H. (2012). The role of personal values and basic traits in perceptions of the consequences of immigration: A three-nation study. British Journal of Psychology, 103(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02079.x
80.
VecchioneM.SchwartzS. H. (2022). Personal values and academic achievement. British Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 630–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12555
81.
VecchioneM.SchwartzS. H.AlessandriG.DoringA. K.CastellaniV.CapraraM. G. (2016). Stability and change of basic personal values in early adulthood: An 8‐year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.002
82.
VecchioneM.SchwartzS. H.DavidovE.CieciuchJ.AlessandriG.MarsicanoG. (2020). Stability and change of basic personal values in early adolescence: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 88(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12502
83.
VeenstraR.Laninga-WijnenL. (2023). The prominence of peer interactions, relationships, and networks in adolescence and early adulthood. In CrockettL. J.CarloG.SchulenbergJ. E. (Eds.), APA handbook of adolescent and young adult development (pp. 225–241). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000298-014
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
