Studies on the impacts of communication technologies on civil conflict often focus on the presence of cell phone networks and draw mixed conclusions. Meanwhile, communication technologies have been advancing and the nature of telecommunication has changed. I argue that the richness of information exchange marked by the introduction of 3G mobile technologies provides an opportunity to push the debate forward, by leading to an increase in the violence of insurgent groups in a high-intensity episode. I focus on Afghanistan as a tough test for my argument. Analysing the effect of introducing 3G network in existing 2G network areas using matched wake analysis and spatial models, I find that the introduction of 3G is associated with an increase in the number of violent events, IED attacks, and coordinated multiple attacks perpetrated by Afghan insurgents. The results are robust to different sizes of spatial units, placebo tests, and less likely to suffer from reporting bias.
AnkersenC.MartinM.2021. The Taliban, Not the West, Won Afghanistan’s Technological War. MIT Technology Review. Accessed October 20, 2021.
2.
ArslanM. E.2025. “Replication Data for: “Did 3G Make Afghan Insurgents Fight More Effectively? A Disaggregated Study”, Journal of Conflict Resolution”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GPGZME
3.
BailardC. S.2015. “Ethnic Conflict Goes Mobile: Mobile Technology’s Effect on the Opportunities and Motivations for Violent Collective Action.” Journal of Peace Research52 (3): 323–37.
4.
BashirM.2017. Taliban Propaganda Meets the Digital Age. RFE/RL. Accessed October 20, 2021.
5.
BBC. 2012. Afghan Taliban Use Phones for Propaganda. BBC. Accessed October 20, 2021.
6.
BBC. 2016. Taliban App Removed from Google Store. BBC. Accessed October 20, 2021.
7.
BuhaugH.GatesS.LujalaP.. 2009. “Geography, Rebel Capability, and the Duration of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 544–69.
8.
CIESIN. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. Center for International Earth Science Information Network - Columbia University. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).
9.
ClarkK.2020. One Land, Two Rules (11): Delivering Public Services in Insurgency-Affected Districts – A Synthesis Report. Afghanistan Analysts Network. Accessed October 20, 2021.
10.
ClarkK.BjelicaJ.2018. One Land, Two Rules (1): Service Delivery in Insurgent-Affected Areas, an Introduction. Afghanistan Analysts Network. Accessed October 20, 2021.
11.
CookS. J.WeidmannN. B.. 2021. “Race to the Bottom: Spatial Aggregation and Event Data.” International Interactions48 (3): 471–91.
12.
DoctorA. C.WalshJ. I.. 2021. “The Coercive Logic of Militant Drone Use.” The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters51 (2): 73–84.
13.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
14.
GeschD. B.VerdinK. L.GreenleeS. K.. 1999. “New Land Surface Digital Elevation Model Covers the Earth.” Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union80 (6): 69–70.
GiustozziA.2007. Koran, Kalashnikov and Laptop: The Neo-Taliban Insurgency in Afghanistan. Hurst.
17.
GiustozziA.2019. The Taliban at War: 2001-2018. Oxford University Press.
18.
GohdesA. R.2020. “Repression Technology: Internet Accessibility and State Violence.” American Journal of Political Science64 (3): 488–503.
19.
GoldbaumC.PadshahS.2023. The Taliban Government Runs on WhatsApp. There’s Just One Problem. New York Times. Accessed June 19, 2023.
20.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG.. 2012. “Causal Inference Without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis20 (1): 1–24.
21.
ITU. No Date. Digital Development Dashboard. ITU. Accessed October 20, 2021.
22.
KannA.2021. As the Taliban Offensive Gained Momentum, So Did Its Twitter Propaganda Campaign. The Medium. Accessed October 20, 2021.
23.
MahmoodR.JetterM.. 2020. “Communications Technology and Terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution64 (1): 127–66.
24.
MeekJ. G.2015. Taliban Urges Supporters to Use Texting App to Get Jihadi News. ABC News. Accessed October 20, 2021.
25.
MozurP.2021. How the Taliban Turned Social Media into a Tool for Control. New York Times. Accessed October 20, 2021.
26.
MustafaF.2021. “Can Cellphone Shutdowns Stop Terrorist Violence? Evidence from Pakistan.” Terrorism and Political Violence35 (2): 1–20.
27.
NickellS.1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica49 (6): 1417–26.
28.
NOAA. no date. Version 4 DMSP-OLS Nighttime Lights Time Series. Image and Data Processing by Noaa’s National Geophysical Data Center. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Data Collected by the US Air Force Weather Agency. Accessed May 25, 2022.
29.
PayabW.2009. “ICT Progress in Afghanistan.” In ITU Regional Cybersecurity Forum for Asia-Pacific. Afghanistan National Data Center, Ministry of Communications and IT. Accessed October 20, 2021.
30.
PierskallaJ. H.HollenbachF. M.. 2013. “Technology and Collective Action: the Effect of Cell Phone Coverage on Political Violence in Africa.” American Political Science Review107 (2): 207–24.
RaleighC.HegreH.. 2009. “Population Size, Concentration, and Civil War. A Geographically Disaggregated Analysis.” Political Geography28 (4): 224–38.
33.
SaeedS.2021. Taliban 2.0: Older, Media-Savvy and Still Duplicitous. Politico. Accessed October 20, 2021.
34.
SchutteS.DonnayK.. 2014. “Matched Wake Analysis: Finding Causal Relationships in Spatiotemporal Event Data.” Political Geography41: 1–10.
35.
SediqiA. Q.JainR.2019. Taliban Fighters Double as Reporters to Wage Afghan Digital War. Reuters. Accessed October 20, 2021.
36.
SextonR.2016. “Aid as a Tool Against Insurgency: Evidence from Contested and Controlled Territory in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review110 (4): 731–49.
37.
ShapiroJ. N.WeidmannN. B.. 2015. “Is the Phone Mightier than the Sword? Cell Phones and Insurgent Violence in Iraq.” International Organization69 (2): 247–74.
38.
ShaverA.WrightA.2016. “Are Modern Insurgencies Predictable? New Evidence from Afghanistan and Iraq.” Working Paper.
39.
ShevoryK.2016. Once a Bright Spot, Afghan Telecoms Face Unsustainable Losses. New York Times. Accessed May 16, 2021.
START. 2019. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, University of Maryland. The Global Terrorism Database (GTD).
42.
van LinschotenS.KuehnF.. 2018. The Taliban Reader: War, Islam and Politics in Their Own Words. Oxford University Press.Alex
43.
WalterB. F.2017. “The New New Civil Wars.” Annual Review of Political Science20 (1): 469–86.
44.
WarrenC. T.2014. “Not by the Sword Alone: Soft Power, Mass Media, and the Production of State Sovereignty.” International Organization68 (1): 111–41.
45.
WarrenC. T.2015. “Explosive Connections? Mass Media, Social Media, and the Geography of Collective Violence in African States.” Journal of Peace Research52 (3): 297–311.
46.
WeidmannN. B.2016. “A Closer Look at Reporting Bias in Conflict Event Data.” American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 206–18.
47.
Yanagizawa-DrottD.2014. “Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide.” Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (4): 1947–94.
48.
ZeitzoffT.2017. “How Social Media is Changing Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution61 (9): 1970–91.
49.
ZeitzoffT.2018. “Does Social Media Influence Conflict? Evidence from the 2012 Gaza Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (1): 29–63.
50.
ZhukovY. M.DavenportC.KostyukN.. 2019. “Introducing xSub: A New Portal for Cross-National Data on Subnational Violence.” Journal of Peace Research56 (4): 604–14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
