Commitment problems make civil wars difficult to end. Research on overcoming commitment problems focuses on warring parties, however civilians’ perceptions are central to successful transitions from war to peace. While civilians residing in areas previously controlled by armed groups may be highly distrustful that governments will implement peace agreements, I argue that some armed groups are both motivated and capable of improving trust in the state. Using survey data from civilians in the Bangsamoro, Philippines, I show that civilians that experienced rebel security provision or rebel justice provision from the MILF are more likely to trust that the Government of the Philippines will fully implement the peace agreement than civilians that did not experience rebel governance provision.
AdamJeroen. 2018. “Bringing Grievances Back In: Towards an Alternative Understanding of the Rise of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front in the Philippines.” Bijdragen tot de taal-, land-en volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia174, no. 1: 1-23.
2.
AdrianoFerminParksThomas. 2013. The Contested Corners of Asia: Subnational Conflict and International Development Assistance: The Case of Mindanao, Philippines. Asia Foudation.
ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, eds. 2015. Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BadranR.2014. “Intrastate Peace Agreements and the Durability of Peace.” Conflict Management and Peace Science31 (2): 193-217.
6.
BellowsJ.MiguelE.. 2009. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Public Economics93 (11-12): 1144-1157.
7.
BinningsbøH.2017. “Monitoring Attitudes, Perceptions and Support (MAPS).”
8.
BlairR. A.KalmanovitzP.. 2016. “On the Rights of Warlords: Legitimate Authority and Basic Protection in War-Torn Societies.” American Political Science Review110 (3): 428-440.
9.
BlairR. A.Moscoso-RojasM.CastilloA. V.WeintraubM.. 2022. “Preventing Rebel Resurgence after Civil War: A Field Experiment in Security and Justice Provision in Rural Colombia.” American Political Science Review: 1-20.
BreslawskiJori. 2021. “The Social Terrain of Rebel Held Territory.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65, no. 2-3: 453-479.
12.
ChristensenMaya M.UtasMats. 2008. “Mercenaries of Democracy: The ‘Politricks’ of Remobilized Combatants in the 2007 General Elections, Sierra Leone.” African Affairs107, no. 429: 515-539.
13.
CunninghamKathleen GallagherSawyerKatherine. 2019. “Conflict Negotiations and Rebel Leader Selection.” Journal of Peace Research56, no. 5: 619-634.
14.
DalyS. Z.2014. “The Dark Side of Power-Sharing: Middle Managers and Civil War Recurrence.” Comparative Politics46 (3): 333-353.
15.
DalySarah Zukerman. 2016. Organized Violence After Civil War: The Geography of Recruitment in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
16.
De JuanA.PierskallaJ. H.. 2016. “Civil War Violence and Political Trust: Microlevel Evidence from Nepal.” Conflict Management and Peace Science33 (1): 67-88.
17.
Delos SantosRomelo L.2015. Can the 2014 Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (CAB) succeed in Mindanao where previous agreements failed?Naval Postgraduate School Monterey CA.
18.
DuyvesteynI.2017. “Rebels & Legitimacy; An Introduction.” Small Wars & Insurgencies28: 669-685.
19.
DyrstadK.BakkeK. M.BinningsbøH. M.. 2021. “Perceptions of Peace Agreements and Political Trust in Post-War Guatemala, Nepal, and Northern Ireland.” International Peacekeeping28 (4): 606-631.
20.
FabbeK.HazlettC.SınmazdemirT.. 2019. “A Persuasive Peace: Syrian Refugees’ Attitudes Towards Compromise and Civil War Termination.” Journal of Peace Research56 (1): 103-117.
21.
FearonJames D.1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 577-592.
22.
FerrinDonald L.DirksKurt T.ShahPri P.. 2006. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Third-Party Relationships on Interpersonal Trust.” Journal of Applied Psychology91, no. 4: 870.
23.
GinsburgTom. 2019. “Rebel Use of Law and Courts.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science15: 495-507.
24.
GozgorG.2022. “Global Evidence on the Determinants of Public Trust in Governments During the COVID-19.” Applied Research in Quality of Life17 (2): 559-578.
25.
GreenhillK. M.OppenheimB.. 2017. “Rumor Has It: The Adoption of Unverified Information in Conflict Zones.” International Studies Quarterly61 (3): 660-676.
26.
HaasNicholasKhadkaPrabin B.. 2020. “If They Endorse It, I Can’t Trust It: How Outgroup Leader Endorsements Undercut Public Support for Civil War Peace Settlements.” American Journal of Political Science64, no. 4: 982-1000.
27.
HaassFelixCaroline AHartzell,MartinOttmann,. 2022. “Citizens in peace processes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, p.00220027221089691.
28.
HaimDotanFernandezM. C.CruzM.. 2019. “Evaluation Report. Innovations for Poverty Action.”
29.
HegerLindsay L.JungDanielle F.. 2017. “Negotiating With Rebels: The Effect of Rebel Service Provision on Conflict Negotiations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution61, no. 6: 1203-1229.
International Crisis Group (ICG). 2021. “Southern Philippines: Keeping Normalisation on Track in the Bangsamoro.”
32.
JoshiM.QuinnJ. M.. 2017. “Implementing the Peace: The Aggregate Implementation of Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Peace Duration After Intrastate Armed Conflict. British Journal of Political Science47 (4): 869-892.
33.
KovacsM.HöglundK.JiménezM.. 2021. “Autonomous Peace? The Bangsamoro Region in the Philippines Beyond the 2014 Agreement.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development16 (1): 55-69.
34.
KubotaYuichi. 2021. “Imagined statehood: Wartime rebel governance and post-war subnational identity in Sri Lanka.” World Development90: 199-212.
35.
LatiphA.2022. Examining Local Grievances and Militant Groups in the Southern Philippines. United States Institute of Peace.
36.
LevenduskyM. S.HorowitzM. C.. 2012. “When Backing Down is the Right Decision: Partisanship, New Information, and Audience Costs.” The Journal of Politics74 (2): 323-338.
37.
LiljaJ.2011. “Ripening Within? Strategies Used by Rebel Negotiators to End Ethnic War.” Negotiation Journal27(3): 311-342.
38.
MarsdenP.1982. “Brokerage Behavior in Restricted Exchange Networks.” Social Structure and Network Analysis7 (4): 341-410.
39.
MartinPhilip A.2020. “Commander–Community Ties After Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research58: 0022343320929744.
40.
MasturaI.2013. “Philippines: Bangsamoro, a Triumph of Western Diplomacy?” Small Wars Journal9 (1).
41.
MatanockAila M.Garbiras-DíazNatalia. 2018. “Considering Concessions: A Survey Experiment on the Colombian Peace Process.” Conflict Management and Peace Science35, no. 6: 637-655.
42.
McAdamDouglasTarrowSidneyTillyCharles. 2003. The Dynamics of Contention, New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
43.
O'reillyMarieO SuilleabhainAndreaPaffenholzThania. 2015. Reimagining Peacemaking: Women's Roles in Peace Processes. International Peace Institute.
44.
ÖzerdemAlpaslanPodderSukanya. 2012. “Grassroots and Rebellion: A Study on the Future of the Moro Struggle in Mindanao, Philippines.” Civil Wars14, no. 4: 521-545.
45.
PodderS.2013. “Non-State Armed Groups and Stability: Reconsidering Legitimacy and Inclusion.” Contemporary Security Policy34 (1): 16-39.
46.
PodderSukanya. 2014. “Mainstreaming the Non-State in Bottom-Up State-Building: Linkages Between Rebel Governance and Post-Conflict Legitimacy.” Conflict, Security & Development14 (2): 213-243.
47.
ReiterAndrew G. 2015. “Does Spoiling Work? Assessing the Impact of Spoilers on Civil War Peace Agreements.” Civil Wars17, no. 1: 89-111.
48.
RoodSteven. 2014. Implementation of Bangsamoro Holds Lessons for Philippines as a Whole. The Asia Foundation.
49.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.. 1984. “Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score.” Journal of the American Statistical Association79, no. 387: 516-524.
50.
ShawJames B.1980. “An Information-Processing Approach to the Study of Job Design.” Academy of Management Review5, no. 1: 41-48.
51.
SilvermanD.KaltenthalerK.DagherM.. 2021. “Seeing is Disbelieving: The Depths and Limits of Factual Misinformation in War.” International Studies Quarterly65 (3): 798-810.
52.
SouthAshleyJollChristopher M.. 2016. “From Rebels to Rulers: The Challenges of Transition for Non-State Armed Groups in Mindanao and Myanmar.” Critical Asian Studies48, no. 2: 168-192.
53.
StedmanStephen John. 1997. “Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes.” International Security22, no. 2: 5-53.
54.
SteeleA.WeintraubM.. 2022. “Rebel Governance and Political Participation.” Working Paper.
55.
StewartMegan A.2021. Governing for Revolution: Social Transformation in Civil War. Cambridge University Press.
56.
TellezJ. F.2019. “Peace Agreement Design and Public Support for Peace: Evidence from Colombia.” Journal of Peace Research56 (6): 827-844.
57.
TerpstraN.FrerksG.. 2017. “Rebel Governance and Legitimacy: Understanding the Impact of Rebel Legitimation on Civilian Compliance With the LTTE Rule.” Civil Wars19 (3): 279-307.
58.
ThemnérAnders. 2015. “Former Military Networks and the Micro-Politics of Violence and Statebuilding in Liberia.” Comparative Politics47, no. 3: 334-353.
59.
ThemnérAndersUtasMats. 2016. “Governance Through Brokerage: Informal Governance in Post- Civil War Societies.” Civil Wars18, no. 3: 255-280.
60.
TranchantJean-Pierre. 2016. “Is Regional Autonomy a Solution to Ethnic Conflict? Some Lessons from a Dynamic Analysis.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy22, no. 4: 449-460.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
