Rebel actors engage in a number of behaviors beyond violent conflict, including social service provision, diplomacy, and establishing local governance. This article centers on an oft-overlooked aspect of rebel behavior and governance: rebel groups conducting popular elections in wartime. We argue that rebel elections are a means through which rebels can strengthen both local and international legitimacy, but that there are risks to employing elections (such as logistical failures or publicized disconnect from civilians). We hypothesize that rebels that are pursuing legitimacy (local and international) in other ways are likely to set up rebel elections and that rebel groups with greater organizational capacity are more likely to introduce elections because they are well placed to manage the risks elections entail. Using a global data set of rebel use of elections where local civilians vote to elect rebel representatives at various levels of organizational hierarchy, we find empirical support for these propositions.
AdhikariAditya. 2014. The Bullet and the Ballot Box: The Story of Nepal’s Maoist Revolution. London, UK: Verso Books.
2.
ArjonaAna. 2016. Rebelocracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, eds. 2015. “Introduction.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, Chapter1, edited by ArjonaA.KasfirN.MampillyZ., 1–20. New York: Cambridge University Press.
BertocciPeter. 1989. “Resource Development and Ethnic Conflict in Bangladesh: The Case of the Chakmas in the Chittagong Hill Tracts.” In Religious and Ethnic Minority Politics in South Asia, edited by VajpeyiDhirendraMalikYogendra, 139–73. Riverdale, MD: The Riverdale Company.
6.
BhaumikSubir. 1996. Insurgent Crossfire: North-East India. Delhi, India: Lancer.
7.
BobClifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge.
8.
BraithwaiteJessica MavesCunninghamKathleen Gallagher. 2020. “When Organizations Rebel: Introducing the Foundations of Rebel Group Emergence (FORGE) Dataset.” International Studies Quarterly64 (1): 183–93.
9.
BraunRobertGenkinMichael. 2014. “Cultural Resonance and the Diffusion of Suicide Bombings: The Role of Collectivism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (7): 1258–84.
10.
BrownleeJason. 2007. “Can America Nation-build?” World Politics59 (2): 314–40.
11.
BurmanSandraScharfWilfried. 1990. “Creating People’s Justice: Street Committees and People’s Courts in a South African City.” Law and Society Review24 (3): 693–744.
12.
ChabalPatrick. 1983. “Party, State, and Socialism in Guinea-Bissau.” Canadian Journal of African Studies/La Revue canadienne des études africaines17 (2): 189–210.
13.
CogginsBridget L.2011. “Friends in High Places: International Politics and the Emergence of States from Secessionism.” International Organization65 (3): 433–67.
14.
CogginsBridget L.2015. “Rebel Diplomacy: Theorizing Violent Non-state Actors’ Strategic Use of Talk.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 98–118. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ConnellDan. 2001. “Inside the EPLF: The Origins of the People’s Party’ & Its Role in the liberation of Eritrea.” Review of African Political Economy28 (89): 345–64.
16.
CunninghamDavid E.GleditschKristian S.SalehyanIdean. 2013. “Nonstate Actors in Civil Wars: A New Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (5): 516–31.
17.
CunninghamKathleenSawyerKatherine. 2019. “Conflict Negotiations and Rebel Leader Selection.” Journal of Peace Research56 (5): 619–34.
18.
DalySarah Zukerman. 2016. Organized Violence after Civil War: The Geography of Recruitment in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DoyleMichael W.SambanisNicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
DuyvesteynIsabelle. 2017. “Rebels and Legitimacy; An Introduction.” Small Wars & Insurgencies28 (4-5): 669–85.
21.
FazalTanisha. 2018. Wars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
FlynnD. J.StewartMegan A.. 2018. “Secessionist Social Services Reduce the Public Costs of Civilian Killings: Experimental Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom.” Research & Politics5 (4). doi: 10.1177/2053168018810077.
23.
FortnaVirginia PageHuangReyko. 2012. “Democratization after Civil War: A Brush-clearing Exercise.” International Studies Quarterly56 (4): 801–08.
24.
FredericksenPatriciaLondonRosanne. 2000. “Disconnect in the Hollow State: The Pivotal Role of Organizational Capacity in Community-based Development Organizations.” Public Administration Review60 (3): 230–39.
25.
GandhiJennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GawthorpeAndrew J.2017. “All Counterinsurgency Is Local: Counterinsurgency and Rebel Legitimacy.” Small Wars & Insurgencies28 (4-5): 839–52.
27.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.DohertyDavidDowlingConor M.. 2013. “Is There a Secret Ballot? Ballot Secrecy Perceptions and Their Implications for Voting Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science43 (1): 77–102.
28.
GerschewskiJohannes. 2013. “The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes.” Democratization20 (1): 13–38.
29.
GopalAnand. 2018. “Syria’s Last Bastion of Freedom.” The New Yorker, December 10.
30.
HegerLindsay L.JungDanielle F.. 2017. “Negotiating with Rebels: The Effect of Rebel Service Provision on Conflict Negotiations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution61 (6): 1203–29.
31.
HodgesTony. 1983. Western Sahara: The Roots of a Desert War. Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill.
32.
GreenAmelia. 2016. “The Commander’s Dilemma: Creating and Controlling Armed Group Violence.” Journal of Peace Research53 (5): 619–32.
33.
HuangReyko. 2016a. “Rebel Diplomacy in Civil War.” International Security40 (4): 89–126.
34.
HuangReyko. 2016b. The Wartime Origins of Democratization: Civil War, Rebel Governance, and Political Regimes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HydeSusan D.2011. The Pseudo-Democrat’s Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
36.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2008. “Matching for Causal Inference without Balance Checking.” doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1152391.
37.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2011. “Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding.” Journal of the American Statistical Association106 (493): 345–61.
38.
JacksonAshley. 2018. “Life under the Taliban Shadow Government.” Overseas Development Institute Report. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.
39.
JamesIIIMartinW.. 2011. A Political History of the Civil War in Angola: 1974–1990. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
40.
JoHyeran. 2015. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KalyvasStathis N.2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
42.
KalyvasStathis N.2015. “Rebel Governance during the Greek Civil War, 1942–1949.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 119–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
KalyvasStathis N.BalcellsLaia. 2010. “International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict.” American Political Science Review104 (3): 415–29.
44.
KasfirNelson. 2005. “Guerrillas and Civilian Participation: The National Resistance Army in Uganda, 1981–86.” The Journal of Modern African Studies43 (2): 271–96.
45.
KasfirNelson. 2015. “Rebel Governance–Constructing a Field of Inquiry: Definitions, Scope, Patterns, Order, Causes.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 21–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
KasfirNelsonFrerksGeorgTerpstraNiels. 2017. “Introduction: Armed Groups and Multi-layered Governance.” Civil Wars19 (3): 257–78.
47.
KaufmanStuart. 2017. “South Africa’s Civil War, 1985–1995.” South African Journal of International Affairs24 (4): 501–21.
48.
KiernanBen. 1985. How Pol Pot Came to Power: A History of Communism in Kampuchea, 1930–1975. London, UK: Verso.
49.
KnutsenCarl HenrikNygårdHåvard MokleivWigTore. 2017. “Autocratic Elections: Stabilizing Tool or Force for Change?” World Politics69 (1): 98–143.
50.
LasleyTraceThyneClayton. 2015. “Secession, Legitimacy and the Use of Child Soldiers.” Conflict Management and Peace Science32 (3): 289–308.
51.
LawotiMahendra. 2010. “Evolution and Growth of the Maoist Insurgency in Nepal.” In The Maoist Insurgency in Nepal: Revolution in the Twenty-first Century, edited by LawotiMahendraPahariAnup K., 3–30. New York: Routledge.
52.
LoyleCyanne. 2021. “Rebel Justice During Armed Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65 (1): 108–34. doi: 10.1177/0022002720939299.
53.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
54.
MalejacqRomain. 2017. “From Rebel to Quasi-state: Governance, Diplomacy and Legitimacy in the Midst of Afghanistan’s Wars (1979–2001).” Small Wars & Insurgencies28 (4-5): 867–86.
55.
MaleskyEdmundSchulerPaul. 2011. “The Single-party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (4): 491–530.
56.
MampillyZachariah Cherian. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
57.
MampillyZachariah Cherian. 2015. “Performing the Nation-state: Rebel Governance and Symbolic Processes.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 74–97. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
MampillyZachariah CherianStewartMegan. 2021. “A Typology of Rebel Political Institutional Arrangements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65 (1): 15–45. doi: 10.1177/0022002720935642.
59.
MatanockAlia M.2017. Electing Peace: From Civil Conflict to Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
60.
MatanockAila M.García-SánchezMiguel. 2017. “The Colombian Paradox: Peace Processes, Elite Divisions & Popular Plebiscites.” Daedalus146 (4): 152–66.
61.
McLauchlinTheodore. 2015. “Desertion and Collective Action in Civil Wars.” International Studies Quarterly59 (4): 669–79.
62.
MillerMichael K.2015. “Electoral Authoritarianism and Human Development.” Comparative Political Studies48 (12): 1526–62.
63.
MontgomeryTommie Sue. 1995. Revolution in El Salvador: From Civil Strife to Civil Peace. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
64.
MorlinoLeonardo. 2009. “Are There Hybrid Regimes? Or Are They Just an Optical Illusion?” European Political Science Review1 (2): 273–96.
65.
MundyJacob. 2011. “Deconstructing Civil Wars: Beyond the New Wars Debate.” Security Dialogue42 (3): 279–95.
66.
OlsonMancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” American Political Science Review87 (3): 567–76.
67.
OttoSabine. 2018. “The Grass Is Always Greener? Armed Group Side Switching in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (7): 1459–88.
68.
PanossianRazmik. 2001. “The Irony of Nagorno-Karabakh: Formal Institutions versus Informal Politics.” Regional & Federal Studies11 (3): 143–64.
69.
PodderSukanya. 2017. “Understanding the Legitimacy of Armed Groups: A Relational Perspective.” Small Wars & Insurgencies28 (4-5): 686–708.
70.
RevkinMara. 2021. “Competitive Governance and Displacement Decisions Under Rebel Rule: Evidence from the Islamic State in Iraq.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65 (1): 46–80.
71.
RoederPhilip G.2018. National Secession: Persuasion and Violence in Independence Campaigns. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
72.
SchedlerAndreas. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73.
SeidmanRobert B.1983. “How a Bill Became Law in Zimbabwe: On the Problem of Transforming the Colonial State.” In Past and Present in Zimbabwe, edited by PeelJ. D. Y.RangerT. O., 56–76. Manchester, UK: International African Institute.
74.
SekhonJasjeet S.2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.” Annual Review of Political Science12 (1): 487–508.
75.
SeldenMark. 2016. China in Revolution: Yenan Way Revisited: Yenan Way Revisited. New York: Routledge.
76.
SharmaSudheer. 2004. “The Maoist Movement: An Evolutionary Perspective.” In Himalayan People’s War, edited by HuttMichael, 38–57. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
77.
SievertJacqueline. 2018. “The Case for Courts: Resolving Information Problems in Authoritarian Regimes.” Journal of Peace Research55 (6): 774–86.
78.
StanilandPaul. 2014. Networks of Rebellion: Explaining Insurgent Cohesion and Collapse. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
79.
StantonJessica A.2016. Violence and Restraint in Civil War: Civilian Targeting in the Shadow of International Law. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
80.
StewartMegan A.2018. “Civil War as State-making: Strategic Governance in Civil War.” International Organization72 (1): 205–26.
81.
TillyCharles. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
VüllersJohannesSchwarzElisa. 2019. “The Power of Words: State Reactions to Protest Announcements.” Comparative Political Studies52 (3): 347–81.
83.
WeidmannNils B.WardMichael D.. 2010. “Predicting Conflict in Space and Time.” Journal of Conflict Resolution54 (6): 883–901.
84.
WeinsteinJeremy M.2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
85.
Wickham-CrowleyTimothy. 1987. “The Rise (and Sometimes Fall) of Guerrilla Governments in Latin America.” Sociological Forum2 (3): 473–99.
86.
WilsonAliceMcConnellFiona. 2015. “Constructing Legitimacy without Legality in Long Term Exile: Comparing Western Sahara and Tibet.” Geoforum66:203–14.
87.
WoodReedKathmanJacobGentStephen E.. 2012. “Armed Intervention and Civilian Victimization in Intrastate Conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research49 (5): 647–60.
88.
WorrallJames. 2017. “(Re-)emergent Orders: Understanding the Negotiations of Rebel Governance.” Small Wars & Insurgencies28 (4-5): 709–33.
89.
Yassin-KassabRobinAl-ShamiLeila. 2016. Burning Country: Syrians in Revolution and War. London, UK: Pluto Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
