Under what conditions do nations give up parts of their national homeland? This article answers this question using novel data that traces systematically the inclusion of lost homeland territory in discursive definitions of the homeland for all ethnic nationalist homelands truncated between 1945 and 1996. A survival analysis of the continued homeland status of lost lands shows that longer-lasting democracies are significantly less likely to continue to include lost lands within the homeland’s scope, even after controlling for other factors thought to shape the inclusion of territory in the homeland. Since the desire for the control of territory is at the heart of much international conflict, understanding the conditions under which the scope of that territory is redefined contributes to addressing an especially refractory aspect of international politics.
AbdelalRawiHerreraYoshiko M.JohnstonAlastair IainMcDermottRose. 2006. “Identity as a Variable.” Perspectives on Politics4 (4): 695–711. doi: 10.1017/s1537592706060440.
2.
AndersonBenedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.
3.
AndersonEwan W.2003. International Boundaries: A Geopolitical Atlas. London, UK: Psychology Press.
4.
AshTimothy Garton. 1993. In Europe’s Name: Germany and the Divided Continent. New York: Random House.
5.
AtziliBoazKantelAnne. 2015. “Accepting the Unacceptable: Lessons from West Germany’s Changing Border Politics.” International Studies Review17 (4): 588–616. doi: 10.1111/misr.12256.
6.
BellSam R.2017. “Power, Territory, and Interstate Conflict.” Conflict Management and Peace Science34 (2): 160–75. doi: 10.1177/0738894216650428.
CrawfordNeta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DafoeAllanOnealJohn R.RussettBruce. 2013. “The Democratic Peace: Weighing the Evidence and Cautious Inference.” International Studies Quarterly57 (1): 201–14. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12055.
16.
DennettDaniel C.1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
17.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization52 (4): 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789.
18.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn. 2001. “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science4: 391–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.
19.
FravelM. Taylor. 2005. “Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes.” International Security20 (2): 46–83. doi: 10.1162/016228805775124534.
20.
GellnerErnest. 1992. “Nationalism in the Vacuum.” In Thinking Theoretically about Soviet Nationalities: History and Comparison in the Study of the USSR, edited by MotylAlexander J., 243–54. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
21.
GerberAlanGreenDonald P.. 1998. “Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science42: 794–818. doi: 10.2307/2991730.
22.
GiblerDouglas M.2012. The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GleditschKristian Skrede. 2002. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (5): 712–24. doi: 10.1177/002200202236171.
24.
GoddardStacie E.2010. Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GreenfeldLiah. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
HarleyJ. B.1988. “Maps, Knowledge, and Power.” In The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, edited by CosgroveDenisDanielsStephen, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HenselPaul R.2001. “Contentious Issues and World Politics: Territorial Claims in the Americas 1816–1992.” International Studies Quarterly45:81–109. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00183.
28.
HerbGuntram Henrik. 1997. Under the Map of Germany: Nationalism and Propaganda 19181945. London, UK: Routledge.
29.
JenneErin K.2007. Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
KelleFriederike Luise. 2017. “To Claim or Not to Claim? How Territorial Value Shapes Demands for Self-determination.” Comparative Political Studies50 (7): 992–1020. doi: 10.1177/0010414016666837.
31.
KornprobstMarkus. 2008. Irredentism in European Politics: Argumentation, Compromise and Norms. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KuranTimur. 1995. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LewisOrion A.SteinmoSven. 2012. “How Institutions Evolve: Evolutionary Theory and Institutional Change.” Polity44 (3): 314–39. doi: 10.1057/pol.2012.10.
34.
LujalaPaiviRødJan KetilThiemeNadja. 2007. “Fighting Over Oil: Introducing a New Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science24 (3): 239–56. doi: 10.1080/07388940701468526.
35.
LustickIan S.1993. Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
MaShu-Yun. 2016. “Taking Evolution Seriously, or Metaphorically? A Review of Interactions between Historical Institutionalism and Darwinian Evolutionary Theory.” Political Studies Review14 (2): 223–34. doi: 10.1111/1478-9302.12059.
38.
MansfieldEdward D.SnyderJack. 2007. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
MaozZeevRussettBruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986.” American Political Science Review87 (3): 624–38. doi:10.2307/2938740.
40.
MillerBenjamin. 2007. States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Minorities at Risk Project. 2009. Minorities at Risk Dataset(Visited on 01/15/2018).
42.
MylonasHarrisShelefNadav G.. 2014. “Which Land Is Our Land? Domestic Politics and Change in the Territorial Claims of Stateless Nationalist Movements.” Security Studies23 (4): 754–86. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2014.964996.
43.
NewmanDavid. 2001. “Boundaries, Borders, and Barriers: Changing Geographic Perspectives on Territorial Lines.” In Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory, edited by AlbertM.JacobsonD.LapidY., 137–53. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
44.
O’LearyBrendanLustickIan S.CallaghyThomas, Eds. 2001. Right-sizing the State: The Politics of Moving Borders. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
PaasiAnssi. 1996. Territories, Boundaries, and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border. New York: John Wiley.
46.
ParkSunheeHendryDavid J.. 2015. “Reassessing Schoenfeld Residual Tests of Proportional Hazards in Political Science Event History Analyses.” American Journal of Political Science59 (4): 1072–87. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12176.
47.
PiersonPaul. 2000, June. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review94 (2): 251–67. doi: 10.2307/2586011.
48.
RabushkaAlvinShepsleKenneth A.. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
49.
RoystonPatrickLambertPaul C.. 2011. Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis Using Stata: Beyond the Cox Model. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
50.
SackRobert David. 1986. Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
SaidemanStephen M.William AyersR.. 2008. For Kin or Country: Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
52.
ShelefNadav G.2010. Evolving Nationalism: Homeland, Religion, and National Identity in Israel, 1925-2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
ShelefNadav G.2016. “Unequal Ground: Homelands and Conflict.” International Organization70 (1): 33–63. doi: 10.1017/S0020818315000193.
54.
SingerJ. David. 1987. “Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816-1985.” International Interactions14 (2): 115–32. doi: 10.1080/03050628808434695.
55.
SmithAnthony D.1996. “Culture, Community and Territory: The Politics of Ethnicity and Nationalism.” International Affairs72 (3): 445–58. doi: 10.2307/2625550.
56.
SnyderJack L.2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.
57.
ToftMonica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
VogtManuelBormannN. C.RüeggerS.CedermanL.HunzikerP.GirardinL.. 2015. “Integrating Data on Ethnicity, Geography, and Conflict: The Ethnic Power Relations Dataset Family.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (7): 1327–42. doi: 10.1177/0022002715591215.
59.
WalterBarbara F.2009. Reputation and Civil War: Why Separatist Conflicts Are So Violent. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
60.
WangYan. 2016. “Globalization and Territorial Identification: A Multilevel Analysis Across 50 Countries.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research28 (3): 401–14. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv022.
WiegandKrista Eileen. 2011. Enduring Territorial Disputes: Strategies of Bargaining, Coercive Diplomacy, and Settlement. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
63.
WinichakulThongchai. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
64.
WoodDenisFelsJohn. 1992. The Power of Maps. New York: The Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
