Structural theories of international peace among democratic regimes have relied on two distinct explanatory logics: democratic institutions may cause a state’s foreign policy to tend toward peace by exposing policymaking elites to pressure from ordinary citizens (the popular logic) or to pressure from other governmental agencies (the elite logic). These logics are often conflated in scholarly studies of war and peace, but we attempt to isolate the popular logic for empirical testing by developing a novel measure of institutionalized popular influence, the Institutional Democracy Index (IDI). Whereas previous usage of the Polity index to operationalize democratic structures has succeeded in testing the elite logic more than the popular logic, we use the IDI to analyze long-established democracies’ involvement in international conflict between 1961 and 2001. What we find are significant differences within the family of democratic regimes that point to a monadic structural explanation of peace: more popular democracies are less warlike with respect to all other regimes, not just other democracies. By capturing variance among democratic regimes in their structures of inclusion (especially formal rules pertaining to voter access, electoral formulae, and cameral structures), the IDI enables us to observe crucial differences between the conflict propensities of more popular and more elite types of democracy.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastairSiversonRandolphMorrowJames (1999) An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93(4): 791–807.
6.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastairSiversonRandolphMorrowJames (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CarantiLuigi (2006) Perpetual war for perpetual peace? Reflections on the realist critique of Kant’s project. Journal of Human Rights5(3): 341–353.
8.
CarterDavid BSignorinoCurtis S (2010) Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis18(3): 271–292.
9.
CheibubJosé AntonioGandhiJenniferVreelandJames R (2010) Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice143(1): 67–101.
10.
ClarkDavidNordstromTimothy (2005) Democratic variants and democratic variance: How domestic constraints shape interstate conflict. Journal of Politics67(1): 250–270.
11.
ColaresiMichael (2012) A boom with review: How retrospective oversight increases the foreign policy ability of democracies. American Journal of Political Science56(3): 671–689.
12.
CoppedgeMichaelAlvarezAngelMaldonadoClaudia (2008) Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. Journal of Politics70(3): 632–647.
13.
CoxGary (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DafoeAllan (2011) Statistical critiques of the democratic peace: Caveat emptor. American Journal of Political Science55(2): 247–262.
15.
ElkinsZachary (2000) Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 287–294.
16.
GerringJohnThackerStrom C (2008) A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GhosnFatenPalmerGlennBremerStuart (2004) The MID3 data set, 1993–2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science21(2): 133–154.
18.
GiblerDouglasTirJaroslav (2010) Settled borders and regime type: Democratic transitions as consequences of peaceful territorial transfers. American Journal of Political Science54(4): 951–968.
19.
GleditschKristian SWardMichael D (1997) Double take: A reexamination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(3): 361–383.
20.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (2013) Parline Database (www.ipu.org).
21.
IrelandMichaelGartnerScott (2001) Time to fight: Government type and conflict initiation in parliamentary systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution45(4): 547–568.
22.
JoshiDevin (2012) Social and adversarial varieties of democracy: Which produces fewer criminals?Development and Society41(2): 229–252.
23.
JoshiDevin (2013) The protective and developmental varieties of liberal democracy: A difference in kind or degree?Democratization20(2): 187–214.
24.
KantImmanuel (1983) Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Moral Practice. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
25.
KennedyRyan (2009) Survival and accountability: An analysis of the empirical support for ‘selectorate theory’. International Studies Quarterly53(3): 695–714.
26.
KingGaryZengLangche (2001) Explaining rare events in international relations. International Organization55(3): 693–715.
27.
KisanganiEmizetPickeringJeffrey (2009) The dividends of diversion: Mature democracies’ proclivity to use diversionary force. British Journal of Political Science39(3): 483–515.
28.
LeblangDavidChanSteve (2003) Explaining wars fought by established democracies: Do institutional constraints matter?Political Research Quarterly56: 385–400.
29.
LeedsBrett AshleyRitterJeffrey MMitchellSara McLaughlinLongAndrew G (2002) Alliance treaty obligations and provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions28(3): 237–260.
30.
LijphartArend (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
MacMillanJohn (2003) Beyond the separate democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research40(2): 233–243.
32.
MaloyJS (2013) Democratic Statecraft: Political Realism and Popular Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MansfieldEdward DSnyderJack L (2005) Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
MaozZeevRussettBruce (1993) Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review87(3): 624–638.
MassicotteLouisBlaisAndréYoshinakaAntoine (2004) Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
37.
McCormickJohn P (2011) Machiavellian Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
McGannAnthony (2006) The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39.
McGannAnthonyLatnerMichael (2013) The calculus of consensus democracy: Rethinking patterns of democracy without veto players. Comparative Political Studies46(7): 823–850.
40.
MorganT CliftonCampbellSally Howard (1991) Domestic structure, decisional constraints, and war: So why Kant democracies fight?Journal of Conflict Resolution35(2): 187–211.
41.
MousseauMichael (2009) The social market roots of democratic peace. International Security33(1): 52–86.
42.
NorrisPippa (2008) Driving Democracy: Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work?New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PetersonTimothy MGrahamLeah (2011) Shared human rights norms and military conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(2): 248–273.
44.
PickeringJeffreyKisanganiEmizet F (2005) Democracy and diversionary military intervention: Reassessing regime type and the diversionary hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly49(1): 23–43.
45.
PoleJR, ed. (2005) The Federalist. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
46.
PowellG Bingham (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
PowellG Bingham (2006) Election laws and representative governments: Beyond votes and seats. British Journal of Political Science36(2): 291–315.
48.
PrinsBrandonDaxeckerUrsula (2008) Committed to peace: Liberal institutions and the termination of rivalry. British Journal of Political Science38(1): 17–43.
49.
PrzeworskiAdamAlvarezMichaelAntonio CheibubJoséLimongiFernando (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
QuackenbushStephenRudyMichael (2009) Evaluating the monadic democratic peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science26(3): 268–285.
51.
ReiterDanStamAllan (2002) Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
ReiterDanTillmanErik (2002) Public, legislative, and executive constraints on the democratic initiation of conflict. Journal of Politics64(3): 810–826.
53.
ReynoldsAndrew (2011) Designing Democracy in a Dangerous World. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
RousseauDavidGelpiChristopherReiterDanHuthPaul (1996) Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1918–1988. American Political Science Review90(3): 512–533.
55.
RussettBruceOnealJohn (2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: WW Norton.
56.
SignorinoCurtis SRitterJeffrey M (1999) Tau-b or not tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43(1): 115–144.
57.
SingerJ DavidBremerStuartStuckeyJohn (1972) Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965. In: RussettBruce (ed.) Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 19–48.
58.
SridharanEVarshneyAshutosh (2001) Toward moderate pluralism: Political parties in India. In: DiamondLarryGuntherRichard (eds) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 206–237.
59.
TaageperaReinShugartMatthew (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
WardMichael DSiversonRandolph MCaoXun (2007) Disputes, democracies, and dependencies: A reexamination of the Kantian peace. American Journal of Political Science51(3): 583–601.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
