How and to what extent do states influence the level of democracy and autocracy in other states? We argue that states exist internationally in dependence networks with each other and that those networks provide pathways for influence on a state’s domestic institutions. For any given state, a dependence network is a set of partner states with whom it regularly engages in exchanges of valued goods, where those exchanges would be costly to break. We find that an index of three such networks–trade, security and shared international organization membership–significantly influences the domestic political institutions in a given state. These changes are substantively large in the long run, similar in size to regional and global levels of democracy. State capabilities figure heavily in our network measures, thus emphasizing the role of power in the diffusion of domestic political institutions. We also find that network-influenced change works both ways: states can become more autocratic or more democratic.
AbbottKennethSnidalDuncan. 1998. “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (1): 3–32.
2.
BaldwinDavid. 1980. “Interdependence and Power: A Conceptual Analysis.” International Organization34 (4): 471–506.
3.
BeckNathanielGleditschKristian SkredeBeardsleyKyle. 2006. “Space Is More Than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy.” International Studies Quarterly50 (1): 27–44.
4.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.. 1995. “What To Do (and Not To Do) with Time-Series–Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review89 (3): 634–47.
5.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.. 2011. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series–Cross-Section Political Economy Data.” Annual Review of Political Science14:331–52.
6.
BeissingerMark R.2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics5 (2): 259–76.
7.
BoixCarlesStokesSusan C.. 2003. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics55 (4): 517–49.
8.
BrinksDanielCoppedgeMichael. 2006. “Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies39 (4): 463–89.
9.
BurnellPeter J.2000. Democracy Assistance: International Co-operation for Democratization. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
10.
CameronA. ColinGelbachJonah B.MillerDouglas L.. 2011. “Robust Inference with Multiway Clustering.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics29 (2): 238–49.
11.
CarothersThomas. 2009. “Democracy Assistance: Political vs. Developmental?” Journal of Democracy20 (1): 5–19.
12.
CarrEdward Hallett. 1964. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Harper and Row.
13.
CentolaDamonWillerRobbMacyMichael. 2005. “The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self-enforcing Norms.” American Journal of Sociology110 (4): 1009–40.
14.
ChoiIn. 2001. “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data.” Journal of International Money and Finance20 (2): 249–72.
15.
De BoefSuzannaKeeleLuke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 184–200.
16.
DiamondLarry. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy13 (2): 21–35.
17.
DomkeWilliam. 1988. War and the Changing Global System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
EmersonRichard M.1962. “Power-dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review27 (1): 31–41.
19.
EmersonRichard M.1972. “Exchange Theory, Part II: Exchange Relations and Networks.” In Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, edited by BergerJosephZelditchMorrisJrAndersonBo, 58–87. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
20.
EpsteinDavid L.BatesRobertGoldstoneJackKristensenIdaO’HalloranSharyn. 2006. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 551–56.
21.
FinkelSteven E.Pérez-LiñánAníbalSeligsonMitchell A.. 2007. “The Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990-2003.” World Politics59 (3): 404–39.
22.
FranzeseRobert J.JrHaysJude C.. 2008. “Empirical Models of Spatial Interdependence.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Box-SteffensmeierJanetBradyHenryCollierDavid, 570–674. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
GeddesBarbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science2:115–44.
24.
GelmanAndrew. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine27 (15): 2865–73.
25.
GleditschKristian S. 2002b. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (2): 712–24. Updated to 2004 (version 5.0 beta).
GleditschKristian SkredeWardMichael D.. 2006. “Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization.” International Organization60 (4): 911–33.
28.
GoldstoneJack A.BatesRobert H.EpsteinDavid L.GurrTed RobertLustikMichael B.MarshallMonty G.UlfelderJayWoodwardMark. 2010. “A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability.” American Journal of Political Science54 (1): 190–208.
29.
HaggardStephanKaufmanRobert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
HawkinsDarren. 2002. International Human Rights and Authoritarian Rule in Chile. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
31.
HaysJude C.KachiAyaFranzeseRobert J.Jr. 2010. “A Spatial Model Incorporating Dynamic, Endogenous Network Interdependence: A Political Science Application.” Statistical Methodology7 (3): 406–28.
32.
HechterMichael. 1994. “The Role of Values in Rational Choice Theory.” Rationality and Society6 (3): 318–33.
33.
HestonAlanSummersRobertAtenBettina. 2011. Penn World Table, Version 7.0. Philadelphia: Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.
34.
HorneChristine. 2007. “Explaining Norm Enforcement.” Rationality and Society19 (3): 139–70.
35.
HydeSusan. 2011. “Catch Us If You Can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 356–69.
36.
IngramPaulRobinsonJeffreyBuschMarc L.. 2005. “The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology111 (3): 824–58. Updated by Ingram.
37.
JacobyWade. 2006. “Inspiration, Coalition and Substitution: External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations.” World Politics58 (4): 623–51.
38.
KeohaneRobert O.1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization40 (1): 1–27.
39.
KonoDaniel YuichiMontinolaGabriella R.. 2009. “Does Foreign Aid Support Autocrats, Democrats, or Both?” Journal of Politics71 (2): 704–18.
40.
LeedsBrett AshleyRitterJeffrey M.MitchellSara McLaughlinLongAndrew G.. 2002. “Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815-1944.” International Interactions28 (3): 237–60. Updated to 2004 at Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions Project, version 3.0. Accessed February 12, 2015. http://atop.rice.edu.
41.
LepgoldJosephShambaughGeorge. 2002. “Who Owes Whom, How Much, and When? Understanding Reciprocated Social Exchange in International Politics.” Review of International Studies28 (2): 299–52.
42.
LevitskyStevenWayLucan A.. 2010. Competetive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43.
MainwaringScottPérez-LiñánAníbal. 2005. “Latin American Democratization since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns, and Erosions.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, edited by HagopianFrancesMainwaringScott P., 14–62. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MansfieldEdward D.PevehouseJon C.. 2000. “Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict.” International Organization54 (4): 775–808.
45.
MansfieldEdward D.PollinsBrian M.. 2001. “The Study of Interdependence and Conflict: Recent Advances, Open Questions, and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (6): 834–59.
46.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith. 2006. “Polity IV Dataset.” Computer file; version p4v2004. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland. Accessed February 12, 2015. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/.
47.
MilnerHelen V.MukherjeeBumba. 2009. “Democratization and Economic Globalization.” Annual Review of Political Science12:163–81.
48.
MolmLinda. 1997. Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
49.
NickellStephen. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica49 (6): 1417–26.
50.
OttawayMarina. 2003. Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
51.
PemsteinDanielMeserveStephen A.MeltonJames. 2010. “Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type.” Political Analysis18 (4): 426–49.
52.
PevehouseJon C.2002. “Democracy from the Outside-in? International Organizations and Democratization.” International Organization56 (3): 515–49.
53.
PevehouseJon C.2006. “Democratic International Governmental Organizations Promote Peace.” International Organization60 (4): 969–1000.
54.
PosnerEric. 2000. Law and Social Norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
RussettBruceOnealJohn R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.
56.
SimmonsBeth A.DobbinFrankGarrettGeoffrey. 2006. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism.” International Organization60 (4): 781–810.
57.
SingerJ. DavidBremerStuartStuckeyJohn. 1972. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965.” In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by RussettBruce, 19–48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Updated to 2001.
58.
SnijdersTom A. B.2001. “The Statistical Evaluation of Social Network Dynamics.” Sociological Methodology31 (1): 361–95.
WeidmannNils B.KuseDoreenGleditschKristian Skrede. 2010. “The Geography of the International System: The CShapes Dataset.” International Interactions36 (1): 86–106.
62.
WrightJoseph. 2009. “How Foreign Aid Can Foster Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science53 (3): 552–71.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
