What is the relationship between landholding inequality and rural unrest? And why does land reform that ostensibly addresses rural grievances sometimes exacerbate unrest? We advance the understanding of these longstanding questions by shifting the emphasis from how landholding inequality fuels rural grievances to how it captures the collective action capacity of landowners. Using municipal-level data from Brazil’s large land reform program from 1988 to 2013, we demonstrate that the relationship between landholding inequality and unrest is conditional. Isolated threats to landed elites in the form of land invasions are difficult to repel, generating a positive relationship between landholding inequality and one-off land invasions. By contrast, sustained, broader local threats triggered by nearby land reforms catalyze landowner organization to repel land invasions, leading to the reverse relationship. The findings provide a novel answer for why a straightforward link between land inequality and rural unrest is elusive and may generalize to a broad range of similar cases.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames A.. 2006. “Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective.” American Political Science Review100 (1): 115–31.
2.
AlbertusMichael. 2015. Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AlbertusMichaelKaplanOliver. 2013. “Land Reform as a Counterinsurgency: Policy Evidence from Colombia.” Journal of Conflict Resolution57 (2): 198–231.
4.
AlstonLeeLibecapGaryMuellerBernardo. 2000. “Land Reform Policies, the Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management39 (2): 162–88.
5.
AssunçãoJuliano. 2006. “Land Reform and Landholdings in Brazil.” Working Paper, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
6.
BinswangerHans P.DeiningerKlausFederGershon. 1995. “Power, Distortions, Revolt and Reform in Agricultural Land Relations.” In Handbook of Development Economics, Part B, Vol. 3, edited by BehrmanJereSrinivasanT. N., 2659–772. Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier.
BrockettCharles. 1992. “Measuring Political Violence and Land Inequality in Central America.” American Political Science Review86 (1): 169–76.
9.
BrownDavidBrownChristopherDonaghyMaureen. 2011. “The Electoral Consequences of Direct Political Action: Evidence from Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society53 (4): 35–66.
10.
BrunoRegina Angela Landim. 2003. “Nova República: A violência patronal rural como prática de classe.” Sociologias10 (Jul/Dec): 284–310.
11.
CarreirãoYan de Souza. 2006. “Ideologia e partidos políticos.” Opinião Pública12:136–63.
12.
CarterMiguel. 2010. “The Landless Rural Workers Movement and Democracy in Brazil.” Latin American Research Review45:186–217.
13.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563–95.
14.
CostaSandra Helena Gonçalves. 2012. “A Questão Agrária no Brasil e a Bancada Ruralista no Congresso Nacional.” Dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
15.
CowellFrank. 2011. Measuring Inequality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
CPT (Comissão Pastoral da Terra Nacional Brasil). 2014. Conflitos no campo. Technical report. Comissão Pastoral da Terra Nacional Brasil, Goiânia, Brazil.
17.
CramerChristopher. 2003. “Does Inequality Cause Conflict?” Journal of International Development15 (4): 397–412.
18.
DATASUS/SIM. 2014. O sistema de informações sobre mortalidade. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministério da Saúde.
19.
DeiningerKlausSquireLyn. 1996. “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality.” World Bank Economic Review10: 565–91.
20.
FinkelEvgenyGehlbachScottOlsenTricia. 2015. “Does Reform Prevent Rebellion? Evidence from Russia’s Emancipation of the Serfs.” Comparative Political Studies48: 984–1019.
21.
GalorOdedMoavOmerVollrathDietrich. 2009. “Inequality in Landownership, the Emergence of Human-capital Promoting Institutions, and the Great Divergence.” Review of Economic Studies76: 143–79.
22.
GirardiEduardo Paulon. 2014. DATALUTA—Banco De Dados Da Luta Pela Terra. São Paulo, Brazil: Presidente Prudente.
23.
HidalgoF. DanielNaiduSureshNichterSimeonRichardsonNeal. 2010. “Economic Determinants of Land Invasions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics92 (3): 505–523.
24.
IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics). 2014. Perfil Dos Municípios Brasileiros: Pesquisa De Informações Básicas Municipais. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IBGE, Departamento de População e Indicadores Sociais.
25.
INCRA (Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária). 2011. Database on Land Reforms in Brazil. Technical report. Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária, Brasilia, Brazil.
26.
KingRussell. 1973. Land Reform: The Italian Experience. London, UK: Butterworths.
27.
LichbachMark. 1989. “An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies.” World Politics41:431–70.
28.
LiptonMichael. 2009. Land Reform in Developing Countries. London, UK: Routledge.
29.
MasonT. David. 1998. ““Take Two Acres and Call Me in the Morning”: Is Land Reform a Prescription for Peasant Unrest?” The Journal of Politics60:199–230.
30.
MeszarosGeorge. 2013. Social Movements, Law and the Politics of Land Reform: Lessons from Brazil. New York: Routledge.
31.
MidlarskyManus I.1988. “Rulers and the Ruled: Patterned Inequality and the Onset of Mass Political Violence.” The American Political Science Review82:491–509.
32.
MooreWillLindströmRonnyO’ReganValerie. 1996. “Land Reform, Political Violence and the Economic Inequality-political Conflict Nexus.” International Interactions21:335–63.
33.
MullerEdwardSeligsonMitchell. 1987. “Inequality and Insurgency.” The American Political Science Review81:425–51.
34.
MuellerEdward N.SeligsonMitchell A.FuHung-derMidlarskyManus I.. 1989. “Land Inequality and Political Violence.” American Political Science Review83 (2): 577–596.
35.
OndettiGabriel. 2011. Land, Protest, and Politics: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for Agrarian Reform in Brazil. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
36.
PaigeJeffrey M.1975. Agrarian Revolution. New York: Free Press.
37.
PayneLeigh. 1992. Brazilian Business and the Democratic Transition: New Attitudes and Influence. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
38.
PayneLeigh. 2000. Uncivil Movements: The Armed Right Wing and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
RussettBruce M.1964. “Inequality and Instability: The Relation of Land Tenure to Politics.” World Politics16:442–54.
40.
SigaudLygia Maria. 2015. “Under the Black Tarp: The Dynamics of Legitimacy of Land Occupations in Pernambuco.” In Challenging Social Inequality, edited by CarterMichael, 182–201. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
SilvaLigia Maria Osório. 1996. Terras Devolutas e Latifúndio. Campinas, Brazil: Centro de Memoria Unicamp.
42.
VerwimpPhilip. 2005. “An Economic Profile of Peasant Perpetrators of Genocide: Micro-level Evidence from Rwanda.” Journal of Development Economics77:297–323.
43.
WolfordWendy. 2010. This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
WoodElisabeth. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
ZiblattDaniel. 2008. “Does Landholding Inequality Block Democratization?” World Politics60:610–41.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
