Disputants might resolve their disagreements in a piecemeal fashion, addressing a subset of the issues at a time. How viable is such a strategy? I argue that partial settlements signal the desire to resolve disagreements and can lay the foundation for additional cooperation by building trust and/or demonstrating the benefits of dispute resolution. As a result, partial settlements should be associated with the resolution of remaining disagreements. Yet, scholars have questioned whether pursuing a piecemeal approach may be more harmful than helpful, and a systematic empirical test of these competing predictions is necessary. Using data from worldwide territorial claims between 1919 and 2001, I find a strong positive correlation between partial settlements and comprehensive dispute resolution. In the shorter run, partial settlements are also associated with an increased likelihood for peaceful negotiations, but there is only limited evidence that they reduce conflict before all aspects of the claim are resolved.
AbbottKenneth W.SnidalDuncan. 2002. “Filling in the Folk Theorem: The Role of Gradualism and Legalization in International Cooperation to Combat Corruption.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August.
2.
AlleeTodd L.HuthPaul K.. 2006. “Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Legal Rulings as Domestic Political Cover.” American Political Science Review100 (2): 219–34.
3.
AxelrodRobert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BennettD. ScottStamAllan. 2000. “EUGene: A Conceptual Manual.” International Interactions26 (2): 179–204.
5.
BigerGideon. 1995. The Encyclopedia of International Boundaries. New York: Facts on File.
6.
BlumGabriella. 2007. Islands of Agreement: Managing Enduring Armed Rivalries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BoseSumantra. 2007. Contested Lands: Israel-Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Cyprus, and Sri Lanka. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Box-SteffensmeierJanetJonesBradford. 2004. Event History Modeling. A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrownlieIan. 1979. African Boundaries. A Legal and Diplomatic Encyclopedia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CalvertPeter, ed. 2004. Border & Territorial Disputes of the World. 4th ed. London, UK: John Harper.
11.
CarterDavid B.SignorioCurtis S.. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis18 (3): 271–92.
12.
CheibubJose AntonioGandhiJenniferVreelandJames. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice144 (1): 67–101.
13.
ChiozzaGiacomoGoemansH. E.. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?” American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 604–19.
14.
FearonJames D.1996. “Bargaining over Objects That Influence Future Bargaining Power.” Chicago Center on Democracy Working Paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.
15.
FearonJames D.1997. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” International Organization52 (2): 269–306.
16.
FisherRoger. 1964. International Conflict and Behavioral Science. New York: Basic Books.
17.
FisherRogerUryWilliam. 2011. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin Books.
18.
GartnerScott SigmundBercovitchJacob. 2006. “Overcoming Obstacles to Peace: The Contribution of Mediation to Short-lived Settlements.” International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 819–40.
19.
GentStephen E.ShannonMegan. 2010. “The Effectiveness of International Arbitration and Adjudication: Getting into a Bind.” Journal of Politics72 (2): 366–80.
20.
GhosnFatenPalmerGlennBremerStuart. 2004. “The MID3 Data Set, 1993-2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science21 (2): 133–54.
21.
GiblerDouglas M.1996. “Alliances that Never Balance: The Territorial Settlement Treaty.” Conflict Management and Peace Science16 (1): 75–97.
22.
GoemansHenk E.GkeditschKristian SkredeChiozzaGiacomo. 2009. “Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders.” Journal of Peace Research46 (2): 269–83.
23.
HenselPaul R.2000. “Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict.” In What Do We Know about War? edited by VasquezJohn A., 57–84. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
24.
HenselPaul R.2001. “Contentious Issues and World Politics: The Management of Territorial Claims in the Americas, 1816-1992.” International Studies Quarterly45 (1): 81–109.
25.
HenselPaul R.MitchellSara McLaughlin. . 2007. “Issue Correlates of War Project User Manual for ICOW Data, Version 1.1.” Accessed May 15, 2009. www.icow.org.
26.
HenselPaul R.MitchellSara McLaughlinSowersThomas E.IIThyneClayton L.. 2008. “Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues.” Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (1): 117–43.
27.
HuthPaul K.AlleeTodd L.. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HuthPaul K.CrocoSarah E.AppelBenjamin J.. 2011. “Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes? Evidence from the Study of Territorial Conflicts since 1945.” American Political Science Review105 (2): 415–36.
29.
HuthPaul K.ProrokAlyssa K.. 2015. “International Law and the Consolidation of Peace Following Territorial Changes.” Journal of Politics77 (1): 161–74.
30.
HyerEric. 1996. “The Sino-Russian Boundary Settlement.” IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin4 (2): 90–94.
31.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2012. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis20 (1): 1–24.
32.
IkléFred Charles. 1964. How Nations Negotiate. New York: Harper & Row.
33.
KocsStephen A.1995. “Territorial Disputes and Interstate War, 1945-1987.” Journal of Politics57 (1): 159–75.
34.
KratochwilFriedrich V.RohrlichPaulMahajanHarpreet. 1985. Peace and Disputed Territory: Reflection on Conflict over Territory. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
35.
KyddAndrew H.2007. Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
LeedsBrett AshleyMattesMichaela. 2007. “Alliance Politics during the Cold War: Aberration, New World Order, or Continuation of History?” Conflict Management and Peace Science24 (3): 183–99.
37.
LeskiwChristopher S.VasquezJohn. 2001. “The Origins and War Proneness of Interstate Rivalries.” Annual Review of Political Science4:295–316.
38.
LukinAlexander. 2003. The Bear Watches the Dragon. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
MarshallMonty G.GurrTed RobertJaggersKeith. . 2013. “POLITY IV PROJECT: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2012.” Data Users’ Manual. Accessed May 23, 2014. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2012.pdf.
41.
MaxwellNeville. 2007. “How the Sino-Russian Boundary Conflict Was Finally Settled: From Nerchinsk 1689 to Vladivostok 2005 via Zhenbao Island 1969.” In Eager Eyes Fixed on Eurasia, edited by IwashitaAkihiro, 47–73. Hokkaido, Japan: Slavic Research Center, University of Hokkaido.
42.
MiallHugh. 1992. The Peacemakers: Peaceful Settlement of Disputes since 1945. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
43.
MitchellSara McLaughlinHenselPaul R.. 2007. “International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements.” American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 721–37.
44.
MorganT. Clifton. 1990. “Issue Linkages in International Crisis Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science34 (2): 311–33.
45.
OsgoodCharles E.1962. An Alternative to War or Surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
46.
OwsiakAndrew P.2012. “Signing Up for Peace: International Boundary Agreements, Democracy, and Militarized Interstate Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly56 (1): 51–66.
47.
PowellEmilia JustynaWiegandKrista E.. 2010. “Legal Systems and Peaceful Attempts to Resolve Territorial Disputes.” Conflict Management and Peace Science27 (2): 129–51.
48.
PutnamRobert D.1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games.” International Organization42 (3): 427–60.
49.
RabinYitzhak. 1979. The Rabin Memoirs. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
50.
SchultzKenneth A.2014. “What’s in a Claim? De Jure versus De Facto Borders in Interstate Territorial Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (6): 1059–84.
51.
SimmonsBeth A.2002. “Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Institutions and Territorial Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (6): 829–56.
52.
SimmonsBeth A.2005. “Rules over Real Estate: Trade, Territorial Conflict, and International Borders as Institution.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (6): 823–48.
53.
SingerJ. David. 1987. “Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816-1985.” International Interactions14 (2): 115–32.
54.
TelhamiShibley. 1990. Power and Leadership in International Bargaining: The Path to the Camp David Accords. New York: Columbia University Press.
55.
ThompsonWilliam R.2001. “Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics.” International Studies Quarterly45 (4): 557–86.
56.
VasquezJohn A.1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
VoskresenskyAlexei. 1991. “Some Border Issues Unsolved.” New Times19:26–17.
WilsonJeanne L.2004. Strategic Partners: Russian-Chinese Relations in the Post-Soviet Era. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
