In this article, we contend that the current gender and conflict literature ignores the context of military decisions and thus underestimates the support of women for certain types of military interventions. We argue that the issues related to humanitarian crises are likely to provoke support from women. Consequently, as more women enter elected positions in state legislatures, the more likely a state will become involved in a humanitarian military intervention. To test our argument, we compile a data set of humanitarian military interventions and women legislators from 1946 to 2003. A series of estimation approaches and robustness tests support our assertion that more women legislators impact the likelihood that a state will become involved in a humanitarian military intervention. Our research has specific implications on the role of gender in conflict processes and more general implications on the connection between domestic political processes and foreign policy decision making.
AchenC. H.2006. “Let’s Put Garbage-can Regressions and Garbage-can Probits Where They Belong.” Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (4): 327–39.
2.
AngevineS.2014. “Women’s Rights Foreign Policyin the US Congress.” PhD thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
3.
AnziaS. F.BerryC. R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 478–93.
4.
BjarnegårdE.MelanderE.. 2013. “Revisiting Representation: Communism, Women in Politics, and the Decline of Armed Conflict in East Asia.” International Interactions39 (4): 558–74.
5.
BrattonK. A.2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender1 (1): 97–125.
6.
BreuningM.2001. “Women’s Representation and Development Assistance: A Cross-national Study.” Women & Politics23 (3): 35–55.
7.
CaprioliM.2000. “Gendered Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research37 (1): 51–68.
8.
CaprioliM.BoyerM. A.. 2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (4): 503–18.
9.
CarrollS. J.2002. “Representing Women: Congresswomen’s Perceptions of Their Representational Roles.” In Women Transforming Congress, edited by RosenthalC. S., University of Oklahoma Press: Norman, OK, 50–68.
10.
CarterD. B.SignorinoC. S.. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis18 (3): 217–92.
CheibubJ. A.GandiJ.VreelandJ. R.. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143:67–101.
14.
ChildsS.2006. “The Complicated Relationship between Sex, Gender and the Substantive Representation of Women.” European Journal of Women’s Studies13 (1): 7–21.
15.
ChildsS.KrookM. L.. 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women’s Political Representation.” Political Studies56 (3): 725–36.
16.
ChildsS.KrookM. L.. 2009. “Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition44 (2): 125–45.
17.
CingranelliD. L.RichardsD. L.ClayK. C.. 2014. “The CIRI Human Rights Dataset.” Version 2014.04.14. Accessed August 20, 2015. http://www.humanrightsdata.com.
18.
ClarkeK. A.2005. “The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research.” Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (4): 341–52.
19.
ConoverP. J.SapiroV.. 1993. “Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War.” American Journal of Political Science37 (4): 1079–99.
20.
DodsonD. L.2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
DolanJ.1997. “Support for Women’s Interests in the 103rd Congress.” Women & Politics18 (4): 81–94.
22.
EichenbergR. C.2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990-2003.” International Security28 (1): 110–41.
23.
EichenbergR. C.StollR.. 2012. “Gender Difference or Parallel Publics? The Dynamics of Defense Spending Opinions in the United States, 1965-2007.” Journal of Conflict Resolution56 (2): 331–48.
24.
FerrisE.1993. Women, War, and Peace. Technical report. Uppsala, Sweden: Life & Peace Institute.
25.
FisherS.2010. “Violence against Women and Natural Disasters: Findings from Post-Tsunami Sri Lanka.” Violence Against Women16 (8): 902–18.
26.
GeddesB.1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science2:115–44.
27.
GoldsteinJ. S.2001. War and Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HawkesworthM.CaseyK. J.JenkinsK.KleemanK. E.. 2001. Legislating by and for Women: A Comparison of the 103rd and 104th Congresses. Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
29.
HolstiO. R.RosenauJ. N.. 1990. “The Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes among American Leaders.” The Journal of Politics52 (1): 94–125.
30.
HudsonV. M.CaprioliM.Ballif-SpanvillB.McDermottRoseEmmettC. F.. (2008) 2009. “The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States.” International Security33 (3): 7–45.
31.
HuthP.AlleeT. L.. 2002. “Domestic Political Accountability and the Escalation and Settlement of International Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (6): 754–90.
JentlesonB. W.1992. “The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force.” International Studies Quarterly36:49–73.
34.
JentlesonB. W.BrittonR. L.. 1998. “Still Pretty Prudent Post-cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (4): 395–417.
35.
KanterR. M.1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology82 (5): 965–90.
36.
KingG.2001. “Proper Nouns and Methodological Propriety: Pooling Dyads in International Relations Data.” International Organization55 (2): 497–507.
37.
KirshnerJ.2007. Appeasing Bankers: Financial Caution on the Road to War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
KisanganiE. F.PickeringJ.. 2008. “International Military Intervention, 1989-2005.” Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Data Collection 21282, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
39.
KochM. T.FultonS. A.. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” The Journal of Politics73 (1): 1–16.
40.
LawlessJ. L.2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 479–90.
41.
LobellS. E.2008. “Second Face of Security Strategies: Anglo-German and Anglo-Japanese Trade Concessions During the 1930s.” Security Studies17 (3): 438–67.
42.
LoweW.BenoitK.MikhaylovS.LaverM.. 2011. “Replication Data for: The Manifesto Project Data Extended to Include the Logit Scales and Standard Errors.” Accessed August 20, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/17073
43.
MansbridgeJ.2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review97 (4): 515–28.
44.
MarshallM. G.JaggersK.. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Version p4v2010e. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland. Accessed January 24, 2014. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html
45.
MarshallM. G.RamseyD.. 1999. “Gender Empowerment and the Willingness of States to Use Force.” Unpublished research paper, Center for Systemic Peace. Accessed September 10, 2015. http://www.members.aol.com/CSPmgm
46.
MazuranaD.BenelliP.WalkerP.. 2013. “How Sex- and Age-disaggregated Data and Gender and Generational Analyses Can Improve Humanitarian Response.” Disasters37 (s1): S68–82.
47.
MendelbergT.KarpowitzC. F.GoedertN.. 2014. “Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women’s Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science58:291–306.
48.
MoonC.SouvaM.. 2016. “Audience Costs, Information, and Credible Commitment.” Journal of Conflict Resolution60 (3): 434–458doi: 10.1177/0022002714545222
49.
MorganS. L.WinshipC.. 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
MurdieA.PeksenD.. 2014. “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Humanitarian Interventions.” The Journal of Politics76:215–28.
51.
NariznyK.2007. The Political Economy of Grand Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52.
NiarchosC. N.1995. “Women, War, and Rape: Challenges Facing the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Human Rights Quarterly17 (4): 649–90.
53.
NincicM.NincicD. J.. 2002. “Race, Gender, and War.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 547–68.
54.
PaxtonP.GreenJ.HughesM.. 2008. “Women in Parliament, 1945-2003: Cross-national Dataset.” Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 24340, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
55.
PearlJ.2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
PearsonF. S.BaumannR. A.. 1993. “International Military Intervention, 1946-1988.” Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Data Collection 6035, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
57.
PearsonK.DanceyL.. 2011. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics & Gender7 (4): 493–519.
58.
PeksenD.2011. “Foreign Military Intervention and Women’s Rights.” Journal of Peace Research48 (4): 455–68.
59.
PhillipsR.2006. “Food Security and Women’s Health: A Feminist Perspective for International Social Work.” International Social Work52 (4): 485–98.
60.
PlumperT.NeumayerE.. 2006. “The Unequal Burden of War: The Effect of Armed Conflict on the Gender Gap in Life Expectancy.” International Organization60 (3): 723–54.
61.
PowleyE.2007. “Rwanda: The Impact of Women Legislators on Policy Outcomes Affecting Children and Families.” UNICEF: The State of the World’s Children. Accessed September 10, 2015. http://www.unicef.org/sowc07/docs/powley.pdf
62.
RaineyC.2014. “Arguing for a Negligible Effect.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 1083–91.
63.
ReganP. M.PaskeviciuteA.. 2003. “Women’s Access to Politics and Peaceful States.” Journal of Peace Research40 (3): 287–302.
64.
ReiterD.2015. “The Positivist Study of Gender and International Relations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (7): 1301–1326.
65.
SchrodtP. A.2014. “Seven Deadly Sins of Contemporary Quantitative Political Analysis.” Journal of Peace Research51 (2): 287–300.
66.
SchultzK.2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
SeagerJ.2005. “Noticing Gender (or Not) in Disasters.” Social Policy36:29–30.
68.
SeneseP. D.VasquezJ. A.. 2008. The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
ShapiroR. Y.MahajanH.. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” The Public Opinion Quarterly50 (1): 42–61.
70.
SheaP.TeoT. K.LevyJ. S.. 2014. “Opposition Politics and International Crises: A Formal Model.” International Studies Quarterly58 (4): 741–51.
71.
SmithT. W.1984. “The Polls: Gender and Attitudes Toward Violence.” Public Opinion Quarterly48 (3): 384–96.
72.
SnyderJ.1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
73.
SvolikM. W.2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74.
SwersM. L.1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly23 (3): 435–48.
75.
SwersM. L.2002. The Difference Women Make, the Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
76.
SwersM. L.2006. “Providing for the Common Defense: An Analysis of Gender Differences in Defense Policy Participation in the US Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (1): 136.
77.
SwersM. L.2007. “Building a Reputation on National Security: The Impact of Stereotypes Related to Gender and Military Experience.” Legislative Studies Quarterly32 (4): 559–95.
78.
SwersM. L.2013. Women in the club: Gender and policy making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
TesslerM.NachtweyJ.GrantA.. 1999. “Further Tests of the Women and Peace Hypothesis: Evidence from Cross-national Survey Research in the Middle East.” International Studies Quarterly43 (3): 519–31.
80.
TesslerM.WarrinerI.. 1997. “Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes Toward International Conflict: Exploring Relationships with Survey Data from the Middle East.” World Politics49 (2): 250–81.
81.
ThomasS.1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” The Journal of Politics53 (4): 958–76.
82.
ThomasS.1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
83.
TogebyL.1994. “The Gender Gap in Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Peace Research31 (4): 375–92.
84.
WeissT. G.2005. Military-civilian Interactions: Humanitarian Crises and the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
85.
WeldonS. L.2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” The Journal of Politics64 (4): 1153–74.
86.
WilcoxC.HewittL.AllsopD.. 1996. “The Gender Gap in Attitudes toward the Gulf War: A Cross-national Perspective.” Journal of Peace Research33 (1): 67–82.
87.
WisemanA.VoldenC.WittmerD.. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 326–41.
88.
WooldridgeJ. M.2001. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
