Foreign policy often creates geographically concentrated domestic benefits. A prominent example is the tying of development aid to purchases from the donor country. This feature of aid highlights the utility in examining foreign policy as an instance of pork-barrel politics. Considering tied aid in terms of legislators’ incentives to provide constituent benefits, we argue that people will support an increase in foreign aid spending more when it would promote local economic activity, while opposing aid cuts more when reduced local economic output would result. Crucially, we also expect that people will support their state’s US senator more when informed that the senator attempted to secure (or retain) locally beneficial funds. We find support for our expectations in a novel survey experiment of US citizens. Our results suggest that legislators’ electoral incentives, and consequential local spending, can help explain the adoption of foreign policies despite national-level public disapproval.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames A.. 2013. “Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives27 (2): 173–92.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoDollarDavid. 2000. “Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?” Journal of Economic Growth5 (1): 33–63.
3.
AlmondGabriel A.1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.
4.
AvdanNazliWebbClayton. 2019. “Not in My Back Yard: Public Perceptions and Terrorism.” Political Research Quarterly72 (1): 90–103.
5.
BaldwinDavid Allen. 1985. Economic Statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BerinskyAdam J.HuberGregory A.LenzGabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis20 (3): 351–68.
7.
BertelliAnthony M.GroseChristian R.. 2009. “Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy.” The Journal of Politics71 (3): 926–45.
8.
BouttonAndrewCarterDavid. 2014. “Fair Weather Allies: Terrorism and the Allocation of US Foreign Aid.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (7): 1144–73.
9.
BrozJ. LawrenceHawesMichael Brewster. 2006. “Congressional Politics of Financing the International Monetary Fund.” International Organization60 (2): 367–99.
10.
BushSarah Sunn. 2015. The Taming of Democracy Assistance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies14 (4): 1165–205.
12.
ChristiansenWilliamHeinrichTobiasPetersonTimothy M.. 2019. “Foreign Policy Begins at Home: The Local Origin of Support for US Aid and Sanctions.” International Interactions45 (4): 595–616.
13.
CrispBrian F.JensenNathan M.RosasGuillermoZeitzoffThomas. 2010. “Vote-seeking Incentives and Investment Environments: The Need for Credit Claiming and the Provision of Protectionism.” Electoral Studies29 (2): 221–26.
14.
CruzCesiSchneiderChristina J.. 2017. “Foreign Aid and Undeserved Credit Claiming.” American Journal of Political Science61 (2): 396–408.
DietrichSimoneMahmudMinhajWintersMatthew S.. 2018. “Foreign Aid, Foreign Policy, and Domestic Government Legitimacy: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh.” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 133–48.
17.
DixitAvinashLondreganJohn. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” The Journal of Politics58 (4): 1132–55.
18.
EasterlyWilliamWilliamsonClaudia R.. 2011. “Rhetoric versus Reality: The Best and Worst of Aid Agency Practices.” World Development39 (11): 1930–49.
19.
EasterlyWilliamPfützeTobias. 2008. “Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid.” Journal of Economic Perspectives22 (2): 29–52.
20.
FennoRichard F.Jr. 1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. New York: Little, Brown.
21.
FennoRichard F.Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
22.
FerejohnJohn. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
FerwerdaJeremyFlynnD. J.HoriuchiYusaku. 2017. “Explaining Opposition to Refugee Resettlement: The Role of NIMBYism and Perceived Threats.” Science Advances3 (9): e1700812.
24.
FleckRobert K.KilbyChristopher. 2001. “Foreign Aid and Domestic Politics: Voting in Congress and the Allocation of USAID Contracts across Congressional Districts.” Southern Economic Journal67 (3): 598–617.
25.
FleckRobert K.KilbyChristopher. 2006. “How Do Political Changes Influence U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocations?” Review of Development Economics10 (2): 210–23.
26.
FordhamBenjamin O.2009. “Power or Plenty? Economic Interests, Security Concerns, and American Intervention.” International Studies Quarterly52 (4): 737–58.
27.
FordhamBenjamin O.KleinbergKatja B.. 2012. “How Can Economic Interests Influence Support for Free Trade?” International Organization66 (2): 311–28.
28.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.. 2000. “Race Casualties and Opinion in the Vietnam War.” The Journal of Politics62 (1): 115–46.
29.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.WilkeningMichael. 1997. “All Politics Are Local: Local Losses and Individual Attitudes towards the Vietname War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (5): 669–94.
30.
GelmanAndrewLittleThomas C.. 1997. “Poststratification into Many Categories Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression.” Survey Methodology23 (2): 127–35.
31.
GottfriedMatthew S.TragerRobert F.. 2016. “A Preference for War: How Fairness and Rhetoric Influence Leadership Incentives in Crises.” International Studies Quarterly60 (2): 243–57.
32.
GrimmerJustin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
GrimmerJustinWestwoodSean J.MessingSolomon. 2014. The Impression of Influence: Legislator Communication, Representation, and Democratic Accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
HadfieldJarrod D.2010. “MCMC Methods for Multi-response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package.” Journal of Statistical Software33 (2): 1–22.
35.
HaederSimon F.YackeeSusan Webb. 2015. “Influence and the Administrative Process: Lobbying the US President’s Office of Management and Budget.” American Political Science Review109 (3): 507–22.
36.
HainmuellerJensHangartnerDominikYamamotoTeppei. 2015. “Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments Against Real-world Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112 (8): 2395–400.
37.
HainmuellerJensHiscoxMichael J.. 2006. “Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes toward International Trade.” International Organization60 (2): 469–98.
38.
HainmuellerJensHiscoxMichael J.. 2010. “Attitudes towards Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 61–84.
39.
HangartnerDominikMarbachMoritzDinasEliasMatakosKonstantinosXefterisDimitrios. 2019. “Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile?” American Political Science Review113 (2): 442–55.
40.
HeinrichTobias. 2013. “When Is Foreign Aid Selfish, When Is It Selfless?” The Journal of Politics75 (2): 422–35.
41.
HeinrichTobiasKobayashiYoshiharuBryantKristin A.. 2016. “Public Opinion and Foreign Aid Cuts in Economic Crises.” World Development77:66–79.
42.
HiscoxMichael J.2001. “Class versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade.” International Organization55 (1): 1–46.
43.
HonigDan. 2018. Navigation by Judgment: Why and When Top Down Management of Foreign Aid Doesn’t Work. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
HookSteven. 1995. National Interest and Foreign Aid. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Press.
45.
HuffConnorTingleyDustin. 2015. “‘Who Are These People?’ Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics2 (3): 1–12.
46.
KahleDavidWickhamHadley. 2013. “ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2.”The R Journal5 (1): 144–61.
47.
KrinerDouglasShenFrancis. 2014. “Responding to War on Capitol Hill: Battlefield Casualties, Congressional Response, and Public Support for the War in Iraq.” American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 157–74.
48.
LazarusJeggrey. 2009. “Party, Electoral Vulneability, and Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics71 (3): 1050–61.
49.
LippmannWalter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
50.
LowandeKenneth. 2018. “Who Polices the Administrative State?” American Political Science Review112 (4): 874–90.
51.
MansfieldEdward D.MutzDiana C.. 2009. “Support for Free Trade: Self-interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-group Anxiety.” International Organization63 (3): 425–57.
52.
MayhewDavid. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
McLeanElena V.2015. “Multilateral Aid and Domestic Economic Interests.” International Organization69 (1): 97–130.
54.
McLeanElena V.WhangTaehee. 2014. “Designing Foreign Policy Voters, Special Interest Groups, and Economic Sanctions.” Journal of Peace Research51 (5): 589–602.
55.
Milesi-FerrettiGian MariaPerottiRobertoRostagnoMassimo. 2002. “Electoral Systems and Public Spending.” Quarerly Journal of Economics117 (2): 609–57.
56.
MilnerHelen V.TingleyDustin H.. 2010. “The Political Economy of US Foreign Aid: American Legislators and the Domestic Politics of Aid.” Economics and Politics22 (2): 200–32.
57.
MilnerHelen V.TingleyDustin H.. 2011. “Who Supports Global Economic Engagement? The Sources of Preferences in American Foreign Economic Policy.” International Organization75 (1): 37–68.
58.
MilnerHelen V.Dustin HTingley. 2013. “Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: A Review Essay.” International Interactions39 (3): 389–401.
59.
MilnerHelen V.Dustin HTingley. 2015. American Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics: Sailing the Water’s Edge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
MullinixKevin J.LeeperThomas J.DruckmanJames N.FreeseJeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–38.
61.
MutzDiana C.KimEunji. 2017. “The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences.” International Organization71 (4): 827–50.
PalmerGlennWohlanderScott B.Clifton MorganT.. 2002. “Give or Take: Foreign Aid and Foreign Policy Substitutability.” Journal of Peace Research39 (1): 5–26.
64.
PaxtonPamelaKnackStephen. 2011. “Individual and Country-level Factors Affecting Support for Foreign Aid.” International Political Science Review33 (2): 171–92.
65.
PetersonTimothy M.ScottJames M.. 2018. “The Democracy Aid Calculus: Regimes, Political Opponents, and the Allocation of US Democracy Assistance, 1981–2009.” International Interactions44 (2): 268–93.
RogowskiRonald. 1987. “Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade.” American Political Science Review81 (4): 1121–37.
68.
SellersPatrick J.1997. “Fiscal Constituency and Federal Distrct Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science41 (3): 1024–41.
69.
SteinRobert N.BickersKenneth N.. 1994. “Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel.” The Journal of Politics56 (2): 377–99.
70.
StokesSusan C.DunningThadNazarenoMarceloBruscoValeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
71.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by AustinW. G.WorchelS., 33–37. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
72.
ThorpeRebecca U.2014. The American Warfare State: The Domestic Politics of Military Spending. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
USAID (US Agency for International Development). 2018b. “What We Do.” Accessed September 30, 2019. https://www.usaid.gov/what-we-do.
76.
VavreckLynnRiversDouglas. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties18 (4): 355–66.
77.
WangWeiRothschildDavidGoelSharadGelmanAndrew. 2015. “Forecasting Elections with Non-representative Polls.” International Journal of Forecasting31 (3): 980–91.
78.
WeingastBarry R.MarshallWilliam J.. 1988. “The Industria Organization of Congress; or Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy96 (1): 132–63.
79.
YouHye Young. 2017. “Ex Post Lobbying.” The Journal of Politics79 (4): 1162–76.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
